| Literature DB >> 30840227 |
Dominika Stygar1, Bronisława Skrzep-Poloczek2, Ewa Romuk3, Elżbieta Chełmecka4, Jakub Poloczek5, Tomasz Sawczyn2, Justyna Maciarz2, Michał Kukla6, Konrad W Karcz7, Jerzy Jochem2.
Abstract
Metabolic surgery ameliorates insulin resistance and is associated with long-term, effective weight loss, but the mechanisms involved remain unknown. Here, the duodenal-jejunal omega switch (DJOS) surgery in combination with high-fat, high-carbohydrate diet was performed on diet obese rats and joint effects of bariatric surgery and different dietary patterns on heat shock protein 70 (HSP70) and HSP90 plasma and liver concentrations were measured. We found that plasma and liver levels of HSP70 were lower after DJOS surgery in comparison to the control in the groups of animals kept on control diet (CD) and high-fat, high-sugar diet (HFS) but the postoperative change of the diet led to the increase in HSP70 in plasma and liver concentration in DJOS-operated animals. A high-calorie meal, rich in carbohydrates and fats, significantly increased circulating levels of HSP90, reducing the normalising effect of DJOS. The HFS diet applied during all stages of the experiment led to the higher levels of liver HSP90 concentration. The combination of CD and DJOS surgery was the most efficient in the lowering of the HSP90 liver concentration. The normalisation of circulating levels and liver concentrations of HSP70 and HSP90 may be achieved in a combination of DJOS procedure with a proper dietary plan.Entities:
Keywords: Bariatric surgery; Chaperones; HSP70; HSP90; High-fat, high-carbohydrate diet; Oxidative stress
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30840227 PMCID: PMC6439084 DOI: 10.1007/s12192-019-00976-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cell Stress Chaperones ISSN: 1355-8145 Impact factor: 3.667
Fig. 1Scheme of the experiment. a Dietary patterns used pre- and post-surgery. b DJOS procedure. c SHAM procedure
HSP70 and HSP90 plasma levels and liver concentration 8-week postoperatively DJOS (1st column) and SHAM (2nd column) surgery, subjected to different dietary patterns and intergroup comparison between DJOS and SHAM study groups (3rd column) using descriptive statistics and results of two-way analysis of variance
| DJOS (1st column) | SHAM (2nd column) | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CD/CD | CD/HFS | HFS/CD | HFS/HFS | CD/CD | CD/HFS | HFS/CD | HFS/HFS | Group | Op. | Int. | |
| HSP70 plasma (ng/ml) | 0.69 ± 0.06 | 3.92 ± 0.39 | 3.74 ± 0.70 | 1.30 ± 0.41 | 1.47 ± 0.08 | 1.87 ± 0.13 | 2.40 ± 0.54 | 3.75 ± 0.20 | 0.695 | ||
| HSP70 liver tissue (ng/mg protein) | 1.73 ± 0.27 | 3.56 ± 0.11 | 4.09 ± 0.44 | 2.14 ± 0.35 | 3.20 ± 0.07 | 2.67 ± 0.45 | 3.18 ± 0.44 | 2.48 ± 0.34 | 0.975 | ||
| HSP90 plasma (ng/ml) | 0.54 ± 0.11 | 2.36 ± 0.26 | 2.31 ± 0.31 | 3.11 ± 0.99 | 1.58 ± 0.53 | 2.60 ± 0.27 | 4.09 ± 0.93 | 3.17 ± 0.88 | |||
| HSP90 liver tissue (ng/mg protein) | 0.25 ± 0.07 | 1.64 ± 0.39 | 3.30 ± 0.25 | 3.57 ± 0.58 | 2.23 ± 0.44 | 4.09 ± 0.56 | 3.96 ± 1.05 | 9.86 ± 0.90 | |||
| Body weight (g) | 361.1 ± 29.0 | 383.7 ± 17.3 | 392.7 ± 15.7 | 435.4 ± 21.8 | 382.3 ± 47.7 | 376.4 ± 48.3 | 427.0 ± 30.5 | 473.0 ± 40.7 | 0.289 | ||
Mean ± standard deviation or median (lower–upper quartile); the statistical significance was set at a p value below 0.05
Op., operation type; Int., interaction between group and operation type
Multiple comparisons in contrast analysis. Column 1: intergroup comparisons between HFS/HFS, CD/HFS, HFS/CD and CD/CD groups DJOS versus SHAM. Column 2: intragroup comparisons between HFS/HFS, CD/HFS, HFS/CD and CD/CD groups after DJOS surgery. Column 3: intragroup comparisons between HFS/HFS, CD/HFS, HFS/CD and CD/CD groups after SHAM surgery
| Post hoc | DJOS vs SHAM | DJOS | SHAM | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1: CD/CD | 2: CD/HFS | 3: HFS/CD | 4: HFS/HFS | 1 vs 2 | 1 vs 3 | 1 vs 4 | 2 vs 3 | 2 vs 4 | 3 vs 4 | 1 vs 2 | 1 vs 3 | 1 vs 4 | 2 vs 3 | 2 vs 4 | 3 vs 4 | |
| HSP 70 plasma (ng/ml) | 0.386 | 0.073 | ||||||||||||||
| HSP 70 liver tissue (ng/mg protein) | 0.097 | 0.929 | 0.344 | |||||||||||||
| HSP 90 plasma (ng/ml) | 0.518 | 0.858 | 0.880 | 0.122 | ||||||||||||
| HSP 90 liver tissue (ng/mg protein) | 0.069 | 0.447 | 0.712 | |||||||||||||
| Body weight (g) | 0.246 | 0.687 | 0.063 | 0.216 | 0.086 | 0.619 | < 0.05 | 0.746 | < 0.01 | |||||||
The statistical significance was set at a p value below 0.05
Fig. 2Comparison of HSP70 plasma levels (ng/ml) in SHAM and DJOS-operated groups subjected to the different dietary patterns pre- and post-surgery. Abbreviations: CD, control diet; HFS, high-fat, high-sugar diet. Vertical lines depict 95% confidence interval
Fig. 3Comparison of HSP70 liver concentration (ng/mg) in SHAM and DJOS-operated groups subjected to the different dietary patterns pre- and post-surgery. Abbreviations: CD, control diet; HFS, high-fat, high-sugar diet. Vertical lines depict 95% confidence interval
Fig. 4Comparison of HSP90 plasma levels (ng/ml) in SHAM and DJOS-operated groups subjected to the different dietary patterns pre- and post-surgery. Abbreviations: CD, control diet; HFS, high-fat, high-sugar diet. Vertical lines depict 95% confidence interval
Fig. 5Comparison of HSP90 liver concentration (ng/mg) in SHAM and DJOS-operated groups subjected to the different dietary patterns pre- and post-surgery. Abbreviations: CD, control diet; HFS, high-fat, high-sugar diet. Vertical lines depict 95% confidence interval
Fig. 6Body mass (g)