| Literature DB >> 28578702 |
Anayt Ulla1, Md Ashraful Alam2, Biswajit Sikder1, Farzana Akter Sumi1, Md Mizanur Rahman1, Zaki Farhad Habib1, Mostafe Khalid Mohammed1, Nusrat Subhan1, Hemayet Hossain3, Hasan Mahmud Reza4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Obesity and related complications have now became epidemic both in developed and developing countries. Cafeteria type diet mainly composed of high fat high carbohydrate components which plays a significant role in the development of obesity and metabolic syndrome. This study investigated the effect of Syzygium cumini seed powder on fat accumulation and dyslipidemia in high carbohydrate high fat diet (HCHF) induced obese rats.Entities:
Keywords: Antioxidant; Dyslipidemia; Fibrosis; High carbohydrate high fat diet; Oxidative stress
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28578702 PMCID: PMC5455177 DOI: 10.1186/s12906-017-1799-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Complement Altern Med ISSN: 1472-6882 Impact factor: 3.659
Composition of normal and high carbohydrate high fat diet used in this study (for 100 g)
| Ingredients of normal lab diet | Percent | Ingredients of HCHF diet | Percent |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheat | 40% | Powdered normal rat feed | 15.5% |
| Wheat bran | 20% | Sugar | 17.5% |
| Rice Polishing | 5.5% | Beef tallow (fat) | 20.0% |
| Fish meal | 10.0% | Condensed milk | 39.5% |
| Oil cake | 6.0% | Vit-B complex | 0.1% |
| Gram | 0.39% | Salt | 0.5% |
| Pulses | 0.39% | Water | 100 ml |
| Milk | 0.38% | ||
| Soybean Oil | 1.5% | ||
| Molasses | 0.095% | ||
| Salt | 0.095% | ||
| Embavit (vitamin) | 0.1% |
Fig. 1HPLC chromatogram of ethanol extract of Syzygium cumini. Peaks: 1, Gallic acid; 2, (−)-epicatechin; 3, ellagic acid; 4, quercetin; 5, trans-cinnamic acid
Contents of polyphenolic compounds in the ethanol extract of Syzygium cumini (n = 5)
| Polyphenolic compound | Ethanol extract of | |
|---|---|---|
| Content (mg/100 g of dry extract) | % RSD | |
| GA | 1698.37 | 2.15 |
| ECA | 258.22 | 1.27 |
| EA | 1275.36 | 2.08 |
| QU | 8.97 | 0.53 |
| TCA | 33.02 | 1.14 |
GA Gallic acid, ECA (−)-epicatechin, EA ellagic acid, QU quercetin, TCA trans-cinnamic acid
Fig. 2Effect of Syzygium cumini seed powder supplementation on body weight (a), food (b) and water (c) intake in high fat diet induced obese rats. Values are presented as mean ± SEM. n = 7
Effects of HCHF diet and Syzygium cumini seed powder supplementation on body weight, food and water intake and organ wet weight of rats
| Parameters | Control | Control + | HCHF | HCHF+ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Initial body weight (g) | 193.93 ± 1.46a | 200.91 ± 3.23a | 194.44 ± 1.33a | 196.64 ± 1.64a |
| Final body weight (g) | 220.24 ± 6.05a | 216.64 ± 4.51a | 262.63 ± 5.25b | 225.79 ± 3.19a |
| Food intake /d (g) | 15.69 ± 1.48a | 14.10 ± 1.32a | 13.75 ± 1.12b | 10.53 ± 1.21b |
| Water intake/ d(g) | 19.53 ± 0.85a | 18.14 ± 1.71a | 15.00 ± 1.00b | 15.76 ± 0.78b |
| Energy Intake (kj/day) | 282.8 ± 6.3a | 256.9 ± 3.8a | 382.1 ± 5.1b | 300.8 ± 4.9a |
| Liver wet weight (g/100 g of body weight) | 3.09 ± 0.11 | 3.04 ± 0.09 | 2.96 ± 0.04 | 2.70 ± 0.11 |
| Kidney wet weight (g/100 g of body weight) | 0.63 ± 0.01 | 0.57 ± 0.20 | 0.61 ± 0.01 | 0.58 ± 0.02 |
| Heart wet weight (g/100 g of body weight) | 0.29 ± 0.02 | 0.27 ± 0.01 | 0.32 ± 0.02 | 0.30 ± 0.01 |
| LV of heart (g/100 g of body weight) | 0.20 ± 0.01 | 0.20 ± 0.01 | 0.22 ± 0.01 | 0.21 ± 0.01 |
| RV of heart (g/100 g of body weight) | 0.03 ± 0.00 | 0.05 ± 0.01 | 0.07 ± 0.01 | 0.05 ± 0.00 |
| Spleen wet weight (g /100 g of body weight) | 0.33 ± 0.03 | 0.36 ± 0.02 | 0.27 ± 0.01 | 0.35 ± 0.02 |
| Pancreas (g/100 g of body weight) | 0.31 ± 0.11 | 0.42 ± 0.05 | 0.38 ± 0.20 | 0.34 ± 0.02 |
| Fat deposition | ||||
| Paritoneal fat (g/100 g of body weight) | 0.56 ± 0.07a | 0.56 ± 0.10a | 2.42 ± 0.17b | 1.16 ± 0.13b |
| Epididymal fat (g/100 g of body weight) | 0.44 ± 0.05a | 0.71 ± 0.13a | 1.18 ± 0.08b | 0.87 ± 0.11b |
| Mesenteric (g /100 g of body weight) | 0.34 ± 0.08 | 0.43 ± 0.04 | 0.69 ± 0.06 | 0.69 ± 0.07 |
Values are presented as mean ± SEM. n = 7. One way ANOVA followed by Newman-Keuls post hoc test were done for statistical comparison. Values are considered significance at p < 0.05. a vs b, control vs HCHF
Fig. 3Effect of Syzygium cumini seed powder supplementation on oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) before and after the high fat high carbohydrate diet feeding in rats. a OGTT done at the beginning of the study and b is the corresponding area under the curve (AUC) values which showed no differences among the groups tested in the study. c OGTT done at the end of the study and d is the corresponding area under the curve (AUC) values which showed significant differences about glucose utilization among the groups tested in the study. Values are presented as mean ± SEM, n = 7. One way ANOVA followed by Newman-Keuls post hoc test were done for statistical comparison. Values are considered significance at p < 0.05
Effects of high fat diet and Syzygium cumini seed powder supplementation on various biochemical parameters in plasma and liver of diet induced obese rats
| Control | Control + | HCHF | HCHF+ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plasma | ||||
| AST(U/L) | 27.28 ± 4.11a | 27.28 ± .46a | 55.99 ± 6.58b | 30.15 ± 1.93a |
| ALT(U/L) | 30.15 ± 4.85a | 25.84 ± 3.15a | 50.24 ± 3.46b | 44.50 ± 4.11a,c |
| ALP(U/L) | 59.94 ± 3.61a | 50.92 ± 8.71a | 102.19 ± 7.52b | 72.22 ± 6.87a,c |
| MDA(nmol/mL) | 30.48 ± 2.64a | 34.02 ± 3.77a | 52.38 ± 2.13b | 38.79 ± 3.04a |
| NO(nmol/mL) | 8.22 ± 3.71a | 9.47 ± 1.07a | 17.89 ± 3.25b | 10.26 ± 0.87a |
| APOP (nmol/mL) | 272.78 ± 21.71a | 294.21 ± 27.52a | 546.59 ± 44.17b | 336.67 ± 39.28a |
| Catalase(U/min) | 16.33 ± 3.0a | 18.67 ± 2.11a | 9.50 ± 0.99b | 16.50 ± 1.36a |
| GSH(μg/mg protein) | 22.03 ± 2.17a | 18.59 ± 0.78a | 15.05 ± 0.62b | 18.88 ± 0.58a |
| SOD (U/L) | 40.91 ± 3.55a | 38.19 ± 4.94a | 17.01 ± 3.05b | 27.31 ± 3.87a,c |
| Cholesterol (mg/dL) | 166.96 ± 4.70a | 155.18 ± 8.31a | 313.80 ± 22.52b | 233.69 ± 13.70a,c |
| Triglycerides (mg/dL) | 201.48 ± 8.06a | 196.75 ± 8.31a | 316.89 ± 22.31b | 219.93 ± 7.92a |
| LDL (mg/dL) | 35.04 ± 1.83a | 39.24 ± 2.70a | 42.96 ± 1.66a | 45.6 ± 2.72a |
| HDL (mg/dL) | 79.83 ± 9.23a | 88.06 ± 6.40 a | 229.27 ± 20.74b | 145.51 ± 13.72a |
| Insulin (ng/mL) | 0.69 ± 0.08a | 1.11 ± 0.40 a | 1.85 ± 0.35b | 0.82 ± 0.28a |
| Liver | ||||
| MDA(nmol/g tissue) | 93.51 ± 4.60a | 102.23 ± 5.91a | 143.0 ± 9.38b | 105.82 ± 8.71a |
| NO(nmol/ g tissue) | 27.43 ± 2.67a | 22.66 ± 2.83a | 119.96 ± 19.21b | 27.19 ± 2.45a |
| APOP (nmol/g tissue) | 726.51 ± 116.48a | 701.11 ± 43.15a | 1469.37 ± 132.07b | 709.84 ± 75.55a |
| Catalase (U/min/g tissue) | 16.33 ± 3.0a | 18.67 ± 2.11a | 9.50 ± 0.99b | 16.0 ± 1.36a |
| GSH (μg/mg protien) | 28.18 ± 3.44a | 18.85 ± 1.49a | 11.20 ± 0.42b | 19.74 ± 3.65a |
| MPO (U/ g tissue) | 0.31 ± 0.05a | 0.42 ± 0.04a | 1.23 ± 0.12b | 0.87 ± 0.16a |
| SOD (U/g tissue) | 38.40 ± 6.74a | 44.67 ± 5.53a | 15.09 ± 1.80b | 28.50 ± 2.35a |
Values are presented as mean ± SEM. n = 7. One way ANOVA followed by Newman-Keuls post hoc test were done for statistical comparison. Values are considered significance at p < 0.05. a vs b, control vs HCHF and b vs c, HCHF vs HCHF+ Syzygium cumini
Fig. 4Effect of Syzygium cumini seed powder supplementation on hepatic inflammation in high fat diet fed obese rats. a Control; b Control + Syzygium cumini seed; c HCHF (low manification); d HCHF (high magnification); e Fat + Syzygium cumini seed. Magnification 40 X
Fig. 5Effect of Syzygium cumini seed powder supplementation on hepatic fibrosis in high fat diet fed obese rats. a, e Control; b, f Control + Syzygium cumini seed; c, g HCHF; d, h HCHF+ Syzygium cumini seed. Magnification 40 X
Fig. 6Effect of Syzygium cumini seed powder supplementation on hepatic iron deposition in high fat diet fed obese rats. a Control; b Control + Syzygium cumini seed; c HCHF; d HCHF+ Syzygium cumini seed. Magnification 40 X