| Literature DB >> 21859453 |
Helen Hermana M Hermsdorff1, Blanca Puchau, Ana Carolina P Volp, Kiriaque Bf Barbosa, Josefina Bressan, M Ángeles Zulet, J Alfredo Martínez.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Dietary total antioxidant capacity (TAC) has been assumed as a useful tool to assess the relationship between the cumulative antioxidant food capacity and several chronic disorders. The aim of this cross-sectional study was to investigate the potential relationships of dietary TAC with adiposity, metabolic and oxidative stress markers in healthy young adults.Entities:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21859453 PMCID: PMC3179702 DOI: 10.1186/1743-7075-8-59
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutr Metab (Lond) ISSN: 1743-7075 Impact factor: 4.169
Anthropometric, clinical, and lifestyle characteristics, according to tertiles (T) of energy-adjusted dietary TAC (n = 266)
| Energy-adj. dietary TAC (mmol/d) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| T1 (< 1.6) | T2 (1.6-5.9) | T3 (≥ 5.9) | ||
| Participants (n) | 86 | 90 | 90 | |
| Men (n, %) | 34 (39.5)b | 35 (38.8) | 34 (37.8) | 0.994 |
| Age (y) | 21 ± 3e | 22 ± 3 | 23 ± 4 | |
| Body mass index (kg/m2) | 21.8 ± 3.1 | 22.5 ± 2.6 | 21.9 ± 2.4 | 0.201 |
| Waist circumference (cm) | 76.1 ± 9.0e | 75.5 ± 8.1 | 72.9 ± 7.6 | |
| Overweight/ Obesity (n, %)c | 11 (33.3) | 13 (39.5) | 9 (27.3) | 0.731 |
| Mild central obesity (n, %)d | 12 (14.0) | 12 (13.3) | 2 (2.2) | |
| Physical activity practice (n, %) | 47 (54.6) | 54 (60.0) | 60 (66.7) | 0.087 |
| METs (h/ week) | 32 (18;59)e | 40 (20; 85) | 98 (43;186) | |
| Former/ Current smoker (n, %) | 14 (16.9) | 24 (26.7) | 26 (28.9) | 0.106 |
| Vitamin supplement use (n, %) | 10 (11.6) | 23 (25.5) | 28 (31.1) | |
| Hypercholesterolaemia (n, %) | 13 (39.4) | 8 (24.2) | 12 (36.4) | 0.132 |
| Systolic BP (mmHg) | 110 ± 9 | 113 ± 11 | 112 ± 10 | 0.081 |
| Diastolic BP (mmHg) | 72 ± 8e | 69 ± 9 | 66 ± 8 | |
aP-value from one-factor ANOVA test or χ2 test, for continuous or categorical variables, respectively. Non-normally distributed variables were log-transformation before analyses.
bContinuous variables are presented as mean ± SD or median (interquartile interval), while categorical variables are presented as number of the participants (percentages).
cOverweight/Obesity occurrence, according to BMI values (≥ 25 and ≥ 30 kg/ m2, respectively).
dMild central obesity occurrence, according to waist circumference values (≥ 80 and ≥ 94 cm for women and men, respectively).
eP < 0.05, T1 vs. T3; from the post hoc Bonferroni test for multiple comparisons.
TAC, total antioxidant capacity; MET, metabolic equivalent index; BP, blood pressure.
Figure 1Association between dietary TAC and waist circumference values. P-value from partial correlation, adjusted for gender (n = 266).
Food and nutrients consumption, according to tertiles (T) of energy-adjusted dietary TAC (n = 266)
| Energy-adj. dietary TAC (mmol/d) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| T1 (< 1.6) | T2 (1.6-5.9) | T3 (≥ 5.9) | ||
| Participants (n) | 86 | 90 | 90 | |
| Energy intake (kcal) | 2758 ± 699 | 2540 ± 922 | 2785 ± 855 | 0.108 |
| Carbohydrate (% EI) | 50.5 ± 7.9b,c | 47.3 ± 8.4 d | 44.5 ± 8.0 | |
| Protein (%EI) | 15.0 ± 2.5 b,c | 16.5 ± 2.7 d | 17.5 ± 2.6 | |
| Lipids (%EI) | 33.3 ± 6.0 b,c | 36.1 ± 6.1 | 36.9 ± 6.0 | |
| MUFA (%EI) | 6.3 ± 4.2b,c | 12.4 ± 6.2d | 15.7 ± 4.5 | |
| PUFA (%EI) | 4.6 ± 2.1c | 5.5 ± 2.7 | 5.4 ± 1.9 | |
| SFA (%EI) | 12.2 ± 3.6 b,c | 10.6 ± 4.0d | 9.1 ± 3.8 | |
| Dietary fiber (g/d) | 24.2 ± 13.2 b | 25.3 ± 15.0 | 29.6 ± 12.7 | |
| Olive oil (ml/d) | 4 ± 16 b,c | 19 ± 27 d | 39 ± 33 | |
| Fruits (g/d) | 154 ± 120 b,c | 245 ± 190d | 393 ± 300 | |
| Vegetables (g/d) | 94 ± 68 b,c | 253 ± 211d | 572 ± 395 | |
| Fruit juice (ml/d) | 67 ± 95b | 91 ± 122 | 169 ± 233 | |
| Cereals (g/d) | 145 ± 114 | 167 ± 104 | 177 ± 83 | 0.103 |
| Legumes (g/d) | 29 ± 20 | 28 ± 31 | 20 ± 13 | 0.127 |
| Red meats (g/d) | 99 ± 67 | 96 ± 54 | 84 ± 61 | 0.214 |
| Fish (g/d) | 16 ± 43 b,c | 41 ± 52 d | 93 ± 63 | |
| Nuts (g/d) | 8 ± 10 | 7 ± 8 | 15 ± 32 | 0.281 |
| Coffee (ml/d) | 38 ± 63b | 59 ± 82 | 68 ± 84 | |
| Beer (ml/d) | 31 ± 62 | 31 ± 49 | 58 ± 107 | 0.069 |
| Red wine (ml/d) | 6 ± 5b | 7 ± 4d | 50 ± 18 | |
aP-value from one-factor ANOVA test.
bP < 0.05, T1 vs. T3; cP < 0.05, T1 vs. T2; dP < 0.05, T2 vs. T3, from the post hoc Bonferroni test for multiple comparisons.
dietary TAC, dietary total antioxidant capacity; EI, energy intake; MUFA, monounsaturated fatty acid; PUFA, polyunsaturated fatty acid; SFA, saturated fatty acid.
Association of dietary TAC values (as independent variable) and glucose and lipid profile (as dependent variables) in the participants of the study (n = 266)
| Dependent variablesa | Energy-adj. dietary TAC (mmol/d) as independent variable | |
|---|---|---|
| Model 1b | Model 2b | |
| Glucose (mg/dl) | ||
| Insulin (μIU/l) | -0.006 (-0.016; 0.003) | |
| HOMA-IR | -0.008 (-0.019; 0.004) | |
| TC (mg/dl) | 0.002 (-0.002; 0.005) | |
| HDL-c (mg/dl) | ||
| LDL-c (mg/dl) | 0.004 (-0.001;0.008) | -0.001 (-0.003; 0.005) |
| TC:HDL-c ratio | ||
| LDL-c:HDL-c ratio | -0.003 (-0.008; 0.001) | -0.004 (-0.008; 0.001) |
| ox-LDL (U/l)d | ||
| TG (mg/dl) | ||
aNon-normally distributed variables were log-transformed before regression analyses and, adjusted for study center by residual method.
bModel 1: multivariate linear regression adjusted for gender, age (years), waist circumference (cm), daily energy intake (kcal/d), smoking habit (never or smoker/former), METs (h/week), and vitamin supplement use (Yes/ No). Model 2: multivariate linear regression adjusted for as model 1 plus MUFA: SFA ratio intake.
cData are β-coefficient (95% Confidence Interval). Bold style to significant associations.
dn = 224, for this variable.
TAC, total antioxidant capacity; HOMA-IR, insulin resistance index; TC, total cholesterol; HDL-c, high density lipoprotein-cholesterol; LDL-c, low density lipoprotein-cholesterol; ox-LDL, oxidized low density protein cholesterol; TG, triglycerides.
Figure 2Association between log plasma TAC and log ox-LDL. P-value from partial correlation, adjusted for study center, gender, age, energy intake, waist circumference and LDL-c concentrations (n = 224).