Literature DB >> 31859576

Use of intraoperative CT scanning for quality control assessment of cochlear implant electrode array placement.

Robert F Labadie1, Antonio D Schefano1, Jourdan T Holder2, Robert T Dwyer2, Alejandro Rivas1, Matthew R O'Malley1, Jack H Noble3, Benoit M Dawant3.   

Abstract

Background: Imaging of cochlear implant (CI) electrode arrays (EAs) consists of intraoperative fluoroscopy to rule out tip fold-over and/or post-operative computerized tomography (CT) if concern exists regarding extrusion or misplacement of the EA. Intraoperative CT (iCT) can satisfy these current needs and enables specification of final intracochlear position.Aims/objectives: To describe iCT scanning of CI recipients at an academic medical center.Materials and methods: iCT was used to scan CI recipients within the operating room before recovering from general anesthesia.
Results: In fiscal year 2019, 301 CI were placed (83 children, 218 adult). One hundred, seventy-five iCTs were performed (58% of total CIs) of which 52 were children (63% of pediatric CIs) and 123 were adult (57% of adult CIs). Of 7 CI surgeons, use of iCT ranged from 14% to 100% (mean 60%). Four tip fold-overs were identified and corrected intraoperatively. Surgeons reported using the images to improve technique (i.e. pulling back precurved EAs to improve perimodiolar positioning).Conclusion and significance: The current standard of care for CI is to insert EAs without feedback as to final location. iCT provides surgeons with rapid post-insertion feedback which allows detection and correction of suboptimally placed EAs as well as refinement of surgical technique.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cochlear implantation; computerized tomography; intraoperative imaging; quality control

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31859576     DOI: 10.1080/00016489.2019.1698768

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol        ISSN: 0001-6489            Impact factor:   1.494


  5 in total

1.  Hybrid active shape and deep learning method for the accurate and robust segmentation of the intracochlear anatomy in clinical head CT and CBCT images.

Authors:  Yubo Fan; Dongqing Zhang; Rueben Banalagay; Jianing Wang; Jack H Noble; Benoit M Dawant
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2021-11-24

Review 2.  Conversations in Cochlear Implantation: The Inner Ear Therapy of Today.

Authors:  Grant Rauterkus; Anne K Maxwell; Jacob B Kahane; Jennifer J Lentz; Moises A Arriaga
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2022-04-29

3.  Effect of Scala Tympani Height on Insertion Depth of Straight Cochlear Implant Electrodes.

Authors:  William G Morrel; Jourdan T Holder; Benoit M Dawant; Jack H Noble; Robert F Labadie
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2020-02-25       Impact factor: 3.497

4.  Suitable Electrode Choice for Robotic-Assisted Cochlear Implant Surgery: A Systematic Literature Review of Manual Electrode Insertion Adverse Events.

Authors:  Paul Van de Heyning; Peter Roland; Luis Lassaletta; Sumit Agrawal; Marcus Atlas; Wolf-Dieter Baumgartner; Kevin Brown; Marco Caversaccio; Stefan Dazert; Wolfgang Gstoettner; Rudolf Hagen; Abdulrahman Hagr; Greg Eigner Jablonski; Mohan Kameswaran; Vladislav Kuzovkov; Martin Leinung; Yongxin Li; Andreas Loth; Astrid Magele; Robert Mlynski; Joachim Mueller; Lorne Parnes; Andreas Radeloff; Chris Raine; Gunesh Rajan; Joachim Schmutzhard; Henryk Skarzynski; Piotr H Skarzynski; Georg Sprinzl; Hinrich Staecker; Timo Stöver; Dayse Tavora-Viera; Vedat Topsakal; Shin-Ichi Usami; Vincent Van Rompaey; Nora M Weiss; Wilhelm Wimmer; Mario Zernotti; Javier Gavilan
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-03-24

5.  Evaluation of artifacts of cochlear implant electrodes in cone beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Nicholas Bevis; Thomas Effertz; Dirk Beutner; Christian Gueldner
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-07-15       Impact factor: 2.503

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.