Literature DB >> 32083640

Molecular Structure and Function of Janus Kinases: Implications for the Development of Inhibitors.

Alba Garrido-Trigo1, Azucena Salas1.   

Abstract

Cytokines can trigger multiple signalling pathways, including Janus tyrosine kinases [JAK] and signal transducers and activators of transcription [STATS] pathways. JAKs are cytoplasmic proteins that, following the binding of cytokines to their receptors, transduce the signal by phosphorylating STAT proteins which enter the nuclei and rapidly target gene promoters to regulate gene transcription. Due to the critical involvement of JAK proteins in mediating innate and adaptive immune responses, these family of kinases have become desirable pharmacological targets in inflammatory diseases, including ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease. In this review we provide an overview of the main cytokines that signal through the JAK/STAT pathway and the available in vivo evidence on mutant or deleted JAK proteins, and discuss the implications of pharmacologically targeting this kinase family in the context of inflammatory diseases. © European Crohn’s and Colitis Organisation (ECCO) 2019.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Janus tyrosine kinase; cytokine signalling; inflammatory bowel disease

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32083640      PMCID: PMC7395311          DOI: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjz206

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Crohns Colitis        ISSN: 1873-9946            Impact factor:   9.071


1. Introduction

Inflammatory bowel diseases [IBDs], including ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease, are thought to result from the interplay between genetic susceptibility and environmental factors that trigger an abnormal mucosal immune response. An impaired balance of pro- and anti-inflammatory mediators drives disease manifestation and hampers the resolution of inflammation, thereby perpetuating disease and increasing disease burden. Cytokines play a crucial role in all steps of the inflammatory cascade that occurs in IBD. Early studies identified cytokine deregulation in these patients.[1-3] Furthermore, evidence in gene knockout [KO] animals revealed the crucial role of cytokine-driven immunoregulatory signals in maintaining mucosal homeostasis. Indeed, interleukin [IL]-2-KO[4] and IL-10-KO[5] animals have been described as spontaneous models of intestinal inflammation, underscoring the importance of these two cytokines in promoting regulatory responses at the mucosal barrier. Since then, innumerable studies have delineated patterns of cytokine regulation and their target cells, both in experimental models and in human disease.[6] Remarkably, two of the currently approved therapies in IBD interfere with cytokine function by using antibodies against tumour necrosis factor alpha [TNFα] and p40[IL-12/IL-23]. These therapies block the extracellular function of cytokines, but an alternative and broader method for interfering with these mediators is to inhibit their intracellular signalling through cell-permeable small-molecule inhibitors. In order to drive responses on target cells, cytokines need to bind to their specific receptors, which triggers a signalling pathway that will reach the cell nuclei. Although these intracellular signals vary among cytokines, they can be shared by different cytokine receptors. Specifically, a group of cytokines implicated in the pathogenesis of several diseases, including IBD, signal through the Janus tyrosine kinase [JAK] family.[7,8] Thus, JAKs are currently desirable targets for the treatment of inflammatory disease.[9,10] Specifically, tofacitinib, a potent pan-JAK inhibitor, has been approved to treat moderate to severe ulcerative colitis.[11,12] Whereas the clinical potential of this antagonist is well proven, several questions remain unanswered, including: the specific cells and cytokine pathways these molecules act on in the context of IBD; the actual requirements for higher specificity in order to drive effective and safer JAK inhibition; the benefits of local versus systemic delivery; and so on. Here we provide clinicians and translational researchers with an overview of the current understanding of JAKs’ function and their potential involvement in processes that could prove relevant to the treatment of intestinal inflammation.

2. Cytokines and Cytokine Receptors

The cytokine superfamily is a large group of structurally diverse low molecular weight soluble proteins that includes ILs, chemokines [CCL or CXCL], colony-stimulating factors [CSF], interferons [IFN], transforming growth factors [TGF], and TNF family members. A common way to categorise this large and diverse cytokine family is based on the class of receptors they bind to. These include the following: type I and type II receptors[13] [Table 1A]; the TNF receptor superfamily [TNFR]; TGF-beta receptors; the immunoglobulin family, which includes the IL-1 receptor superfamily[14,15]; the enzyme-like receptor family, which encompasses the tyrosine kinases family [RPTKs][16,17]; chemokine receptors [guanylate cyclase-coupled receptors][18]; and tyrosine kinase class III receptors[19] [Table 1B].
Table 1.

List of cytokine receptors and their main cytokine ligands.

[A]
JAK-dependent cytokine receptors and ligands
Receptor familyLigand
-Type I receptors
Common ɣ chain [ɣc]IL-2, IL-4, IL-7, IL-9, IL-15, IL-21
TSLP receptorTSLP
IL-6 family [gp-130]IL-6, IL-11, IL-27, IL-35, LIF, OSM, CNTF, CT-1, CLC, NP, IL-31*
IL-12 familyIL-12, IL-23
Common β chainIL-3, IL-5, GM-CSF
Homodimer receptorsEPO, TPO, G-CSF, GH, PRL
-Type II receptors
IL-13 receptorIL-13, IL-4
IFN type IIFNα, IFNβ,
IFN type IIIFNɣ
IFN type IIIIL28, IL28A, IL29
IL-10 familyIL-10, IL-19, IL-20, IL-22, IL-24, IL26
[B]
JAK-independent cytokine receptors and ligands
Receptor familyLigand
-TNF receptor familyTNFα, TNFβ, LT, CD4, FasL, BAFF, Aprl, Ox40, GITR
-IL-17 receptor familyIL-17A, IL-17B, IL-17C, IL-17DIL-17E [IL-25], IL-17F
-TGF receptor familyTGFβs, Activin A, GDF1, GDF11, BMPs, Nodal
-Enzyme-like receptors
Receptor tyrosine kinase family [RPTKs]Ej. EGF, PDGF, VEGF, Insulin
Chemokine family [guanylate-cyclase-coupled receptors]CCL, CXCL, XCL, CXC3L
Receptor tyrosine kinase class IIICSF-1, SCF, PDGFb, FLT3L
-Immunoglobulin-like family
IL-1 receptor familyIL-1α, IL-1β, IL-18, IL-33, IL1F5, IL1F6, IL1F7, IL1F8, IL1F9, IL1F10

Cytokine receptors that depend on JAK signalling are shown in [A] and those that are JAK-independent are shown in[B].

IL, interleukin; TSLP, thymic stromal lymphopoietin; OSM, oncostatin M; LIF, leukaemia inhibitory factor; CNTF, cytokine ciliary neurotrophic factor; CT-1, cardiothropin 1; CLC, cardiothropin-like cytokine; NP, neuropoetin; EPO, erythropoietin; Tpo, thrombopoietin; G-CSF, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor; GH, growth hormone; PRL, prolactin; IFN, interferon; EGF, epidermal growth factor; PDGF, platelet-derived growth factor; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor; SCF, stem cell factor; M-CSF, macrophage colony-stimulating factor; FLT3L, FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 ligand; PDGFb, platelet-derived growth factor subunit B; TNF, tumour necrosis factor. *The cytokine IL-31 does not signal through gp130 but shares the subunit [OSMRβ] with OSM, which belongs to the IL-6 receptor family.

List of cytokine receptors and their main cytokine ligands. Cytokine receptors that depend on JAK signalling are shown in [A] and those that are JAK-independent are shown in[B]. IL, interleukin; TSLP, thymic stromal lymphopoietin; OSM, oncostatin M; LIF, leukaemia inhibitory factor; CNTF, cytokine ciliary neurotrophic factor; CT-1, cardiothropin 1; CLC, cardiothropin-like cytokine; NP, neuropoetin; EPO, erythropoietin; Tpo, thrombopoietin; G-CSF, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor; GH, growth hormone; PRL, prolactin; IFN, interferon; EGF, epidermal growth factor; PDGF, platelet-derived growth factor; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor; SCF, stem cell factor; M-CSF, macrophage colony-stimulating factor; FLT3L, FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 ligand; PDGFb, platelet-derived growth factor subunit B; TNF, tumour necrosis factor. *The cytokine IL-31 does not signal through gp130 but shares the subunit [OSMRβ] with OSM, which belongs to the IL-6 receptor family. Each receptor family uses different signalling molecules to reach the cell nucleus and initiate a cellular response. For instance, the G-protein coupled receptors that bind chemokines induce the activation of protein G [guanine nucleotide-binding protein] that hydrolyses GTP. Type I and type II receptors, on the other hand, rely on the catalytic activity of JAKs to phosphorylate and activate a group of transcriptional factors known as the signal transducer and activator of transcription [STAT] family. Within the group of cytokines that requires JAKs for their functionality, a few are essential to intestinal homeostasis and are involved in the pathophysiology of IBD; these include IL-12, IL-23, oncostatin [OSM], IFNɣ, IL-10, IL-9, and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor [GM-CSF], among others.[7] Nonetheless, it is important to note that several other key mucosal and IBD cytokines [i.e. TNF, IL-17A, chemokines, TGF-β, or IL-1] operate completely independently of the functions of JAKs. In other words, their activity would not be directly targeted by pharmacological inhibition of JAK activity.

3. Molecular Structure and Signal Transduction of Janus Tyrosine Kinases

In mammals, the JAK family is composed of four members: JAK1, JAK2, JAK3, and TYK2 [tyrosine kinase 2]. JAKs are non-receptor tyrosine kinase proteins constitutively associated with the intracellular domains of type I and type II cytokine receptors.[20] JAKs are large proteins with unique JAK homology [JH] domains numbered in a C-terminal to N-terminal direction [Figure 1]. From the primary structure, putative domains are known to be conserved between mammalian, avian, teleost, and insect JAKs.[21] Seven JH [JH1–JH7] domains have been described and the C-terminal domain JH1, known also as the kinase domain, is the domain that presents catalytic activity.[22] Adjacent to the kinase domain is the pseudokinase domain [JH2], a feature unique to JAKs. Although the pseudokinase domain lacks catalytic activity, it has an essential regulatory function since mutations within this domain can impact on kinase activity.[23] The importance of this domain to JAK functionality is illustrated by a single-point mutation within the JH2 pseudokinase domain of JAK2, one that is present in the majority of patients with polycythaemia vera, as well as in a high percentages of patients with essential thrombocythaemia and idiopathic myelofibrosis.[24-26] The N-terminal domain, known as the FERM [band-4.1 protein, ezrin, radixin, and moesin] domain [JH6-JH7], mediates interaction with the cytokine receptor subunits, since deletion of the N-terminal region abrogates binding.[21] In addition, the FERM domain is thought to regulate catalytic activity of the C-terminal kinase domain, as mutations in this domain can impact JAK1 functionality.[27] In between the FERM and the pseudokinase domain lies the Src homology 2 [SH2] domain [JH3-JH5], which also facilitates associations with the cytokine receptors that provide scaffolding.[28] Recently completed crystal structures of JAK1, JAK2, and TYK2 revealed that the FERM and SH2 domains are closely associated to form a single receptor-binding module.[29]
Figure 1.

Schematic of Janus kinase proteins structure. Janus kinases comprise the FERdomain [JH6-JH7] and the SH2 domain [JH3-JH5], both mediating receptor interactions, the pseudokinase domain [JH2] with regulatory function, the catalytic domain [JH1], and the kinase domain.

Schematic of Janus kinase proteins structure. Janus kinases comprise the FERdomain [JH6-JH7] and the SH2 domain [JH3-JH5], both mediating receptor interactions, the pseudokinase domain [JH2] with regulatory function, the catalytic domain [JH1], and the kinase domain. JAKs are located in the cytosol near the cell membrane. After ligand stimulation, receptors undergo conformational changes [dimerisation] that bring JAKs into proximity with each other [Figure 2]. JAKs through their N-terminal domain are constitutively associated with a proline-rich, membrane-proximal domain of these cytokine receptors. JAKs trans/auto-phosphorylate each other and subsequently phosphorylate the tyrosine residues within the intracellular tails of the receptor chains. These phosphorylated tyrosine residues then serve as docking sites for STAT proteins, which bind via their SH2 domains. At that point, JAKs phosphorylate the tyrosine residues of the C-termini of STATs. Once activated by phosphorylation, STATs dissociate from the receptor and homo/hetero-dimerise. The phosphorylated STAT dimer can subsequently translocate from the cytoplasm to the nucleus, where it binds to specific DNA sequences on target genes and induces or represses gene transcription.[30]
Figure 2.

Overview of cytokine signalling through the Janus kinase pathway. Cytokines bind to homodimeric or heterodimeric receptors, after ligand stimulation receptors undergo conformational changes and bring JAKs into proximity which each other. JAKs trans/auto phosphorylate each other and the receptor, allowing STATS to bind to the receptor. Subsequently JAKs phosphorylate STATS, allowing them to dimerise and translocate to the nucleus to regulate gene transcription.

Overview of cytokine signalling through the Janus kinase pathway. Cytokines bind to homodimeric or heterodimeric receptors, after ligand stimulation receptors undergo conformational changes and bring JAKs into proximity which each other. JAKs trans/auto phosphorylate each other and the receptor, allowing STATS to bind to the receptor. Subsequently JAKs phosphorylate STATS, allowing them to dimerise and translocate to the nucleus to regulate gene transcription. In mammals, there are seven STAT proteins, STAT1, STAT2, STAT3, STAT4, STAT5A, STAT5B, and STAT6, that are involved in a wide variety of downstream signalling cascades. Consistent with the activation of JAK-dependent pathways, different STATs have been implicated in the pathophysiology of IBD.[31,32] In contrast to JAK inhibitors, the development/utility of STAT inhibitors has been considered primarily in the context of cancer.[33] Nevertheless, there have been no human studies to date examining STAT inhibition for the treatment of IBD.

4. JAK-dependent Receptors

As discussed above, both type I and type II cytokine receptors require JAK activity to signal. Depending on the specific receptors, one or more different members of the JAK family will collaborate to mediate signal transduction [Figure 3]. Thus, each JAK participates in signalling downstream of multiple cytokine receptors, often in association with other JAK family members. In general, all type I and type II receptors rely on JAK1 and/or JAK2 for signalling. TYK2 can partner with both JAK1 and JAK2, whereas JAK3 is by far the less widely expressed JAK protein, being restricted to the common ɣ chain [ɣc]-containing receptors.
Figure 3.

Schematic representation of cytokine and receptor Janus kinase pathway. The four JAKs [JAK1, JAK2, JAK3, and TYK2] are selectively bound to and therefore mediate signalling for various cytokine and hormone receptors. Scheme representing all JAK pathway cytokines and with whom JAKs are associated. TYK2 [shown in dark blue] where there is evidence of its catalytic activity playing an essential role. TYK2 [in light blue] when it plays a scaffolding function. *The cytokine IL-31 does not signal through gp130 because of sharing the subunit [OSMRβ] with OSM, which belongs to the IL-6 receptor family.

Schematic representation of cytokine and receptor Janus kinase pathway. The four JAKs [JAK1, JAK2, JAK3, and TYK2] are selectively bound to and therefore mediate signalling for various cytokine and hormone receptors. Scheme representing all JAK pathway cytokines and with whom JAKs are associated. TYK2 [shown in dark blue] where there is evidence of its catalytic activity playing an essential role. TYK2 [in light blue] when it plays a scaffolding function. *The cytokine IL-31 does not signal through gp130 because of sharing the subunit [OSMRβ] with OSM, which belongs to the IL-6 receptor family.

4.1. Type I receptor-binding cytokines and their biological functions

IL-2 receptor family members share a common subunit, the common gamma chain ɣc [IL-2Rɣ]. Cytokines that signal through the γc include IL-2, IL-4, IL-7, IL-9, IL-15, and IL-21 [Table 1A]. Signalling through the IL-2 family of receptors requires the activation of both JAK3, which partners with the ɣc, and JAK1, which mediates signalling downstream of the corresponding α chain subunit: IL-2Rα, IL-4Rα, IL-7Rα, IL-9Rα, IL-15Rα, and IL-21R, respectively.[34] Exceptionally, the IL-2 and IL-15 receptors include a third shared β chain,[35] IL-2Rβ [CD122]. Besides using the γc receptor expressed by T cells, IL-4 can transduce its signal through a type II receptor comprising IL-4Rα and IL-13Rα1 [Figure 3].[36] The type II IL-4 receptor is expressed primarily on B cells and non-lymphoid cells, and signals through JAK1 and TYK2.[37-40] Remarkably, this same receptor complex is shared by another key Th2 cytokine, IL-13.[41] Most cytokines in this group [i.e., IL-2, IL-4, IL-7, IL-15, and IL-21] are essential for lymphocyte survival, proliferation, and/or activation/differentiation. Indeed tofacitinib, a potent JAK1 and JAK3 inhibitor approved for psoriatic arthritis,ulcerative colitis, and rheumatoid arthritis, significantly reduces the number of circulating lymphocytes in patients.[42,43] Although no data are yet available, other inhibitors under development which selectively target JAK3 [i.e., PF-06651600] or JAK1 [i.e., filgotinib and upadacitinib] may have this same effect based on the necessary role of both JAK3 and JAK1 for signalling downstream of the IL-2R family. Thymic stromal lymphopoietin [TSLP] has a unique receptor complex that uses the IL-7Rα subunit, which partners with TSLPR [CRLF2] instead of ɣc. This cytokine thus relies on JAK1 and TYK2, but not on JAK3.[44,45] Another group of type I cytokine receptors contains the gp130 [CD130] subunit, and is known as the IL-6 family of receptors. Cytokines using these receptors include IL-6, IL-11, IL-27, IL-35, leukocyte inhibitory factor [LIF], OSM, ciliary neurotrophic factor [CNTF], cardiotrophin-1 [CT-1], cardiotrophin-like cytokine [CLC], and neuropoietin [NP][46] [Table 1A].[47] These cytokines use receptors composed of a unique α chain [IL-6R, IL-11R, IL27Rα [WSX-1], IL-12Rβ2, LIF receptor [LIFR], OSMRβ, and CNTFRα], which provides specificity and signals through JAK2, and the common gp130 chain, which mediates signalling through JAK1. TYK2 participates with these receptor complexes, but the role for TYK2-medited phosphorylation in driving responses remains unclear. IL-6 and IL-11 are the only IL-6 type cytokines that can signal through gp130 homodimers and a third alpha subunit [IL-6R and IL-11R, respectively]. IL-27 and IL-35, which are heterodimeric proteins related to the IL-12 family of cytokines, signal [unlike IL-12 and IL-23] through the gp130 subunit. Gp130 partners with IL-27Rα [WSX-1] to deliver IL-27 signals,[48,49] and the receptor for IL-35 uses IL-12Rβ2 [shared with the IL-12 receptor].[50] IL-35 can also signal through homodimers of each of its receptor chains. Both IL-27 and IL-35 depend on JAK1- and JAK2-mediated phosphorylation. LIF, OSM, and CT-1 use gp130 and the LIF receptor subunit [LIFR].[51,52] In addition, a receptor formed by OSMRβ and gp130 can also bind to OSM to deliver signals in a JAK1- and JAK2-dependent manner. CNTF, CLC, and NP share their receptor, a tripartite signalling complex[53] that includes CNTFRα, gp130, and LIFR, all of which use JAK1 and JAK2 for signal transduction. IL-31 is also considered a member of the IL-6R family despite not using the gp130 subunit; instead, it relies on the IL-31RA and OSMRβ subunits, which partner with JAK1 and JAK2, respectively.[54] The IL-12 receptor family, which used to be included within the IL-6 family of receptors, comprises the receptors for IL-12 and IL-23. The former binds a heterodimer formed by IL-12Rβ1 and IL-12-Rβ2, and the latter uses a heterodimer comprising IL-12Rβ1 and IL-23R. The shared IL-12-Rβ1 receptor signals through TYK2, and both IL-12Rβ2 and IL-23R associate with JAK2. The IL-3 receptor family is also known as the common β-chain receptor family, as they all use a β-chain subunit for signalling. Cytokines that bind these receptors are IL-3, IL-5, and GM-CSF [Table 1A].[55] β-chain receptors exclusively use JAK2 dimers to transduce their signals. Members of this cytokine family regulate the growth, differentiation, migration, and effector functions of many haematopoietic cells. The hormone-like receptor family includes the receptors for erythropoietin [EPO], thrombopoietin [TPO], granulocyte colony stimulating factor [G-CSF], growth hormone [GH], and prolactin [PRL]. These are all homodimeric receptors that are exclusively dependent on JAK2.[56] The crucial role played by most of these cytokines and growth factors in haematopoiesis has discouraged the development of selective JAK2 inhibitors in common immune-mediated diseases.

4.2. Type II receptor-binding cytokines and their biological functions

Type II receptors bind to a large group of cytokines, including type I [IFN-α, IFN-β],[57] type II [IFN- ɣ], type III IFNs [IL-28, IL-29, IL28B], and IL-10 related cytokines [IL-10, IL-19, IL-20, IL-22, IL-24, IL-26]. Interestingly, they all rely on JAK1 and either TYK2 or JAK2 to deliver their intracellular signals. Furthermore, the IL-13 receptor is also considered a type II receptor and signals through JAK1 and TYK2. This receptor is formed by the subunits IL-4Rα and IL-13Rα1,[58] the latter associated with TYK2. As mentioned above, IL-4 can also use this receptor complex to transduce signals.[38] Type I IFN receptors are formed by IFNαR1, which is constitutively bound to TYK2, and IFNαR2, which recruits JAK1 to transduce signals.[59] The IFN-ɣ receptor [type II cytokine receptor] is formed by IFNɣR1 and IFNɣR2, which recruit JAK1 and JAK2, respectively. The type III IFN receptor [60] is constituted by two subunits: IL-28RA [IFNλRA], which recruits JAK1, and IL-10RB, which binds to TYK2. Both type I and type III IFNs are essential for antiviral responses.[61-63] It is not surprising that both have similar biological functions, since their signal transduction cascades are very similar. Type II IFN is required for intracellular and extracellular bacteria killing.[64] Both arms of the immune response may be compromised by the use of JAK1 inhibitors such as tofacitinib [a pan-JAK inhibitor], filgotinib, or upadacitinib. The IL10 receptor family is formed by the receptors to IL-10, IL-19, IL-20, IL-22, IL-24, and IL-26.[65] These have in common the IL-10RB subunit shared with type III IFNs, which recruits TYK2 for signal transduction. The IL10RB subunit assembles with IL-10RA, IL-20RA, and IL-22R to form the different cytokine receptors, all of which bind to JAK1.[66,67] These groups of cytokines mediate diverse immune responses, including epithelial defence and regulatory immune responses.[68] Monitoring the degree to which these responses may be affected by those JAK1 inhibitors in IBD would be relevant, especially during maintenance phases.

5. Establishing the Critical Role of JAKs In Vivo

JAKs orchestrate diverse functions of the innate and adaptive immune systems through their critical role in cytokine signal transduction. Shortly after their discovery, their essential role in cytokine signalling was established in experiments using mutagenised cell lines that were resistant to IFNs.[57,59,69,70] The first in vivo evidence of the critical role played by JAKs was the identification of patients with a primary immunodeficiency that was linked to JAK3 functionality.[71] In addition, data in knock-out mice have been crucial to unravelling the contribution of each of these kinases to biologically relevant processes.[72-78] Based on all of this evidence, it is well established that loss of function of any of these four protein kinases entails biological consequences. Importantly, the only viable JAK deficiencies in humans and mice are described in TYK2 and JAK3, suggesting that the deletion of either JAK1 or JAK2 may be incompatible with life. Nonetheless, mutations in any of the four JAKs are linked with a variety of human diseases. For instance, somatic gain of function mutations in JAK2 are associated with myeloproliferative diseases, given the role of JAK2 in haematopoiesis.[79] Other constitutive activating mutations in all four JAKs have been associated with a variety of haematological and solid organ malignancies.[80-83] Below we discuss the available in vivo evidence on mutant or deleted JAK proteins which furthers our understanding of the roles these kinases play in biology. We also hypothesise on the implications of these data in pharmacologically targeting this kinase family.

6. TYK2

TYK2 was the first member of the JAK family to be isolated[84] and was originally described as essential for type I IFN [IFNα and IFNβ] signalling in a human fibroblast cell line.[57] A subsequent study confirmed that TYK2 was critical for type I IFNs signal transduction but was not required for IFNɣ [type II IFN] in human cells.[69] Mice lacking TYK2 are viable and commonly studied today. Experiments on these mice have revealed a partial impairment of the response to IFNα/β. In contrast, the absence of TYK2 in murine cells leads to a complete lack of STAT3 activation in murine splenocytes activated with IL-12, thus establishing the absolute requirement of TYK2 for cellular responses to IL-12. In addition, TYK2 was shown to be dispensable for responses to IL-10, IL-6, or LIF murine fibroblasts.[75] Overall TYK2 activity appears to be essential, at least in mice, for IL-12 signalling, with the partial contribution to type I IFN responses, though not essential for signalling through the IL-6R and IL-10R families, despite binding to these receptor chains. Humans with TYK2 deficiency have been reported in the literature and their phenotypes vary. The first individual to be identified had a homozygous deletion of four nucleotides in the FERM domain of the TYK2 sequence, which abrogates its expression.[85] This patient had been clinically diagnosed with hyper-IgE syndrome and atopic dermatitis, and presented a high susceptibility to infections from diverse microorganisms including viruses, fungi, and mycobacteria. Peripheral blood cells showed almost complete loss of type I IFNs and IL-12 signalling. Furthermore, impairment in IL-10 and IL-6 activity was shown, in apparent disagreement with murine data.[75] Moreover, CD4+ T cells isolated from this patient’s blood failed to produce IFNɣ in response to IL-12 and IL-18, suggesting a defect in Th1 function and/or differentiation in this individual. However, when activated with PMA [phorbol 12-myristate 13-actetate] and ionomycin, JAK2-deficient T cells produced considerable amounts of IFNɣ, showing that type II IFN production was not impaired, but rather response to IL-12. In addition, T cells from this TYK2-deficient patient showed no response to IL-23, as measured by the lack of STAT3 phosphorylation upon stimulation with this cytokine. Overall, these data suggest that TYK2 plays an essential role in responses to IL-12 and IL-23, whereas IFNɣ activity remains as expected, TYK2-independent. Remarkably, in this individual the overall decrease in Th1 responses was accompanied by a bias towards Th2 responses including increased IL-5, IL-13, and IgE production, all of which may be involved in the disease manifestations described in this patient. This observation also agrees with studies performed in mice with a natural mutation in the TYK2 pseudokinase domain, which is associated with hyporesponsiveness to IL-12, IL-23, and type I IFNs.[86] Therefore, although the essential role of TYK2 in response to IL-12 has been clearly established both in human and in murine cells, the requirement of this kinase in signalling downstream of other cytokine receptors that associate with TYK2 remains less clear. More recently a new study has described seven additional patients, with increased susceptibility to mycobacterial infections, who turned out to carry mutations in TYK2 which led to a lack of protein expression. Furthermore, none of these patients developed hyper-IgE syndrome.[87] They did however exhibit impaired responses to IL-12, IL-23, IFN-α, and IL-10, similarly to the first TYK2-deficient patient first described. Response to IL-6 however was not impaired in these seven patients, in contrast to the first reported TYK2-deficient individual. This observation would suggest that TYK2 may be dispensable for IL-6 signalling. Indeed, further data obtained from the first TYK2-deficient patient with the hyper-IgE syndrome showed that impaired response to IL-6 occurred independently of the TYK2 mutation[87] in this patient, as restoring TYK2 expression rescued the response to IFN-α but not to IL-6. Lack of response in TYK2-deficient cells could also be due to defective expression of cytokine receptors. Indeed, the role of TYK2 as a scaffolding protein to stabilise the IFNα receptor has been described in earlier studies.[57,88] In agreement with that observation, TYK2-deficient patients showed a marked downregulation of IFN-αR1, as well as IL-10R2 and IL-12Rβ1, on the cell surface,[87] strongly suggesting that TYK2 plays a crucial role in stabilising cell-surface receptor expression, which would explain the lack of response to type I IFNs, IL-10R and IL-12R binding cytokines. Thus, to dissect the scaffolding function of TYK2 from its catalytic activity [required for downstream signal transduction], one cannot rely on TYK2-deficient cells; instead, inhibitors of the enzymatic activity must be employed. Experiments using a panel of potent TYK2 antagonists with varying degrees of selectivity against other JAK kinases confirm that TYK2 is essential for IL-12 and IL-23 signalling, whereas it is not required for type I IFN, IL-6, and IL-10 induced STAT phosphorylation in human cells, which could instead be completely abrogated by JAK1-specific inhibitors.[89] A recent paper using a TYK2 selective inhibitor [BMS-986165] appears to partially challenge this view.[90] BMS-986165 is an allosteric inhibitor, thus highly specific, and was identified for its selectivity towards the TYK2 pseudokinase domain; nonetheless, it could also bind with lower affinity to the JAK1 pseudokinase domain. BMS-986165 competed with a fluorescent probe to bind to the adenosine 5′-triphosphate [ATP] binding site of the human recombinant TYK2 pseudokinase domain protein with a median inhibitory concentration [IC50] of 0.2 nM, and to the JAK1 pseudokinase domain with an IC50 of 1 nM. As expected, this compound effectively blocked IL-23 and IL-12 responses in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells [PBMCs] with an IC50 of 9 and 11 nM, respectively. In contrast to the previously described TYK2 selective inhibitors that presented 200-fold greater selectivity for TYK2 over JAK1,[89] BMS-986165 inhibited responses to IFNα and IL-10 in human PBMCs with IC50 values ranging between 6 and 14.[89] This effect could, however, be explained by the combined partial inhibition of JAK1 and the potent TYK2 impairment provided by the BMS compound. Regardless of the compound used, TYK2 catalytic activity does not appear essential for IL-6 responses.[89,90] BMS-986165 was also administered as an inhibitor in two models of colitis that can be prevented by anti-p40 [IL-12/IL-23], and afforded complete protection as determined by decreased weight loss and colonic histological scores.[90] In agreement with the potent inhibition of type I IFN responses, the BMS compound was also shown to protect mice from nephritis in a lupus-prone mouse model. In summary, data from human and murine TYK2-deficient cells and selective [or partially selective] TYK2 inhibitors support the idea that the catalytic activity of TYK2 is required for signalling downstream of the IL-12R family, whereas it may be dispensable for responses to IL-6. Contradicting data are available on the essential role of TYK2 in mediating responses to type I IFNs and to cytokines binding to the IL-10R family. Nonetheless, minor allele homozygosity at the rs34536443 single nucleotide polymorphism [SNP] drives the near complete loss of TYK2 function and impairs type I IFN, IL-12, and IL-23 signalling, although responses to IL-6, IL-10 and IL-13 are unaffected.[91] Remarkably, this SNP has been found to confer protection against psoriasis, rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, type 1 diabetes, ankylosing spondylitis, Crohn’s disease, ulcerative colitis, multiple sclerosis, juvenile idiopathic arthritis, and primary biliary cirrhosis.[92-98] Overall, all this evidence makes TYK2 a desirable target for multiple common autoimmune disorders, including IBD.

7. JAK1

Elucidating the non-redundant roles of JAK1 has been complicated by the fact that JAK1-knockdown in mice results in perinatal lethality,[78] with no patients described to date with complete JAK1 deletion. Indeed, the role of JAK1 was initially discovered by generating cell lines resistant to IFN effects. Müller et al. generated a randomly mutagenised human fibrosarcoma cell line that lacked JAK1 and failed to respond to both IFNα/β and IFNɣ.[59] Later, JAK1 was shown to be critical in mediating type III IFN-induced STAT phosphorylation.[99] A 2016 report described a patient who presented an immunodeficiency with susceptibility to mycobacterial infections and who developed a fatal high-grade bladder cancer.[100] This patient turned out to carry two homozygous missense germline mutations in the JAK1 pseudo-kinase domain whcih impaired JAK1 and STAT phosphorylation, resulting in a significantly reduced response to both type I and type II IFNs. Nonetheless, the impact of this mutation on other JAK1-dependent cytokines, including the IL-2, IL-6, and IL-10 family, was not explored in this study. However, impaired responses to IL-2, IL-7, and IL-15 [all using the ɣc that interacts with JAK1] may have contributed to the observed progressive T lymphopenia in this patient and impaired the development of NK and cytolytic T cells. In agreement with a role of JAK1 in lymphocyte development, JAK1-deficient mice die perinatally and have severely reduced numbers of thymocytes, pre-B cells, and mature T and B cells.[78] Experiments using cells derived from these mice show the absolute requirement of JAK1 in mediating responses to all type II receptors [i.e., the receptors to IFNα/β, IFNɣ, and IL-10], as well as to ɣc [i.e., the receptors to IL-2, IL-4, IL-7, IL-9, and IL-15] and gp130-using receptors [i.e., the receptors to IL-6, IL-11, OSM, LIF, CNTF, and CT-1]. Overall the expression of JAK1 is shared by many cell types, as it associates with a large number of cytokine receptor chains. It is therefore not surprising that JAK1 has proven to be essential for embryonic development and that it is involved in many physiologically relevant pathways, including protection from infections and anti-tumour responses. Indeed, somatic mutations in JAK1 have been identified in multiple tumour types.[101-104] Mutations predicted to cause loss of JAK1 function are associated with the reduced expression of IFN-associated genes in different tumour types,[103] stressing the key role of JAK1-mediated responses in tumour surveillance. In addition, JAK1 is broadly involved in microbial responses [i.e,. IL-6, IFNs, OSM] and regulatory homeostatic signals [i.e. IL-10, IL-22], and interfering with its activity may pose risks in the long-term treatment of patients. Nonetheless, JAK1 inhibitors remain a potent and viable option to treat inflammatory diseases. Long-term treatment, however, should be carefully monitored as we learn more about these powerful inhibitors.

8. JAK2

Similar to JAK1, deletion of JAK2 is lethal.[77,105] JAK2 deficiency causes embryonic death due to incomplete erythropoiesis-producing anaemia. Indeed, JAK2 is required for the transmission of signals downstream of the EPO receptor. The phenotype in JAK2-KO mice is more severe than that observed in embryos lacking the EPO receptor,[106] which could be explained by defects in response to additional mediators such as TPO, which also contribute to the expansion of early erythroid lineage cells. Moreover, responses to other cytokines important for haematopoiesis [i.e. GM-CSF, G-CSF, IL-5, and IL-3] are also impaired in JAK2-KO mice. Whereas lack of function or deletion mutations have not been reported, gain-of-function mutations on JAK2 have been extensively documented and linked to myeloproliferative diseases. A single point mutation in the JH2 pseudo-kinase domain of JAK2V617F that leads to the constitutive tyrosine kinase activity of JAK2, is found in 80% of polycythaemia vera patients,[24,107] an acquired myeloproliferative disorder associated with thrombocytosis, leukocytosis, and splenomegaly. Several fusion proteins comprising transcription factors and JAK2 have been recognised in lymphoproliferative and myeloproliferative disorders.[108] Analogous to the activating JAK2V617F mutation, these fusion proteins are constitutively active kinases and promote cell survival and proliferation independently of signals received from cytokine binding. Indeed, the first inhibitor to be approved by the US Food and Drug Administration [FDA] was ruxolitinib [a JAK1/2 antagonist], indicated for the treatment of myeloproliferative neoplasms.[109] In addition to JAK2’s role in signalling through hormone-like receptors and the IL3R family, this kinase is involved in the signalling mediated by IFNɣ and IL-12, the latter a key Th1-inducing cytokine. Indeed, fibroblasts from JAK2-KO mice were defective in IFNɣ signalling, whereas signalling via type I IFN receptors remained intact.[110] In addition, gp130-using receptors have also been shown in mice embryonic stem cells to induce JAK2 and, to a lesser degree, JAK1 phosphorylation. Deletions or point mutations in the membrane-proximal cytoplasmic motifs in gp130 result in the loss of tyrosine phosphorylation of JAK2, which coincides with the lack of signal-transducing capability in gp130 mutants.[111] In summary, despite contributing to the activation of pathways that are potentially involved in inflammatory diseases such as IBD, JAK2 has shown an ineluctable role in haematopoiesis that bars it from becoming a potential target for these diseases. Nonetheless, some molecules that block both JAK1 and JAK2 [i.e. baricitinib and ruxolitinib] have been approved in other autoimmune diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis[112] and tested in lupus erythematosus,[113] showing efficacy and acceptable safety patterns. In contrast, more selective JAK2 inhibitors [i.e., fedratinib] have been restricted to myeloproliferative disease such as myelofibrosis.[114,115]

9. JAK3

JAK3 was the fourth and last member of the JAK family to be discovered.[116] Similar to TYK2, individuals lacking JAK3 protein expression have been reported.[71,117,118] JAK3 associates exclusively with the ɣc [IL-2RG] and is required together with JAK1 for downstream signalling of the IL-2R family of receptors. In contrast to JAK1, which is activated by a large group of cytokine receptors, the role of JAK3 is rather restricted and it primarily regulates lymphocyte maturation, survival, activation, and differentiation. Thus, defects in JAK3 are the second most common form of a severe immunodeficiency in humans.[71,117-119] This mutation shares the phenotype with IL2RG [ɣc] deficiency, known as X-linked severe combined immunodeficiency [X-SCID].[119,120] SCID refers to a group of rare and inherited defects in primary immunity, resulting in the absence of lymphocyte development and significant deficits in host defence. This life-threatening condition is typically presented within the first few months of life by a combination of opportunistic infections. Currently, the only viable clinical therapy for SCID is haematopoietic stem cell transplantation [HSCT].[121] JAK3-SCID is an autosomal recessive form of SCID characterised by the lack of peripheral T and NK lymphocytes with conserved numbers of B cells. Despite having normal B cell numbers, both JAK3- and X-SCID show compromised humoral responses, with impaired B cell activation, maturation, and antibody class switching. This can be explained in part by the lack of T-helper function, although it also stems from the intrinsic B cell dysfunction caused by defective responses to other ɣc/JAK3 cytokines [IL-4 and IL-21] which are important regulators of B cell proliferation and immunoglobulin class switching. In agreement with human data, KO mouse models lacking JAK3 [JAK3-KO mice] or ɣc [IL2RG-KO mice] showed a characteristic SCID phenotype similar to that observed in humans.[119,122-124] JAK3- and ɣc-KO mice have small thymi and lack lymph nodes. Both types of deficient mice showed a defect in T cell development and have functionally unresponsive peripheral T cells with an activated/memory cell phenotype.[125] Moreover, JAK3- and ɣc-deficient mice developed marked B cell lymphopenia with residual functionally deficient B cells. The severely reduced numbers of bone marrow and peripheral B cells observed in ɣc- and JAK3-deficient mice differ from the common phenotype in human SCID, suggesting different requirements for B cell development between species. In JAK3 or IL-7R-KO mice, B cell development is blocked at the pre-B stage, likely due to the impaired IL-7R signalling in mice.[126,127] Additionally, IL-7R has been found to promote rearrangement of the immunoglobulin heavy chain genes.[127] Thus, the B cell maturation defect in KO mice its likely due to the inability of these early B cells to respond to IL-7 signals. In humans, IL-7 signalling is also essential for lymphoid development, survival, and differentiation, but not for B cell maturation. The third most common mutations in SCID patients are in IL7R.[119] IL7R-deficient patients show severe T lymphopenia with normal or increased B cells and, in contrast to JAK3- or ɣc-deficient individuals, normal NK cell development [T−B+NK+ SCID],[128] supporting the importance of IL-7 in NK cell homeostasis in humans. Therefore, IL-7 appears to play different roles between species, being essential for B cell development in mice and for NK cell generation in humans. Overall, JAK3 deficiency is associated in humans with a marked decrease in T and NK cell numbers, as well as a defect in mounting B cell responses. JAK3 inhibitors thus represent powerful tools to treat patients suffering from lymphocyte-dependent immune diseases, although they carry the risk of decreased immunosurveillance and thus require close monitoring. Besides mediating antimicrobial responses, at least four of the ɣc family cytokines [IL-2, IL-9, IL-15, and IL-21] have been reported to exhibit anti-cancer activities.[34] On the other hand, IL-2 has also been considered in the treatment of autoimmunity, due to its critical role in Treg cell homeostasis.[129]

10. Translating Research Findings on Janus Kinase Biology to a Clinical Setting

JAKs receive signals from over 50 cytokines and growth factors with essential roles in the immune system, as evidenced by the dramatic phenotypes described in individuals bearing loss- or gain-of-function mutations in any of the four JAK members. Most of our current knowledge on JAKs derives from the study of these individuals, as well as from animal models that reproduce some of these mutations. A significant success of these studies has been the development of JAK inhibitors—including broad inhibitors, ruxolitinib and tofacitinib—that have benefited thousands of patients suffering from chronic inflammatory diseases. The success of the first generation of JAK inhibitors has pushed research and the development of novel and more selective compounds. The benefits of inhibitors with higher specificity must still be established. Nonetheless, the in vivo and in vitro evidence discussed herein should guide the design of novel approaches and the interpretation of data that will be generated from testing these more specific inhibitors in patients. In principle, molecules with increased JAK specificity may provide efficacy while potentially improving safety. Nonetheless, JAK antagonism represents a broad multiple cytokine-blocking approach to disease treatment. Even antagonists that, at a therapeutic dose range, bind exclusively to one of the four JAK proteins will inhibit an array of different cytokine pathways in contrast to the single-cytokine blocking antibodies commonly used in the clinics. Beyond the difficulty of developing purely selective antagonists, another forthcoming challenge remains in defining which JAK would be the best target for each specific disease or disease phenotype. Targeting JAK1, for example, inevitably interferes with the JAK3-dependent receptors that share signalling with JAK1. Supporting this argument, both tofacitinib [a JAK1 and JAK3 antagonist] and upadacitinib [a selective JAK1 inhibitor][130] are approved for the treatment of moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis with inadequate response or intolerance to methotrexate.[131-133] As discussed above, JAK1 inhibitors have a broad target range which may have contributed to the efficacy of tofacitinib, upadacitinib, or filgotinib, but which may have also impaired protective immune responses [i.e. viral responses]. On the other hand, JAK3-specific inhibitors currently under development [i.e., decernotinib and PF-06651600] exclusively target the ɣc receptor family, while sparing other JAK1-dependent IL-6R and IL-10R cytokines, IL-13, and types I, II, and III IFNs. Selective JAK3 antagonism, we argue, could prove beneficial to those disease phenotypes that rely primarily on T and/or B cells responses which are dependent on cytokine signals such as IL-2, IL-4, IL-7, IL-15, IL-21, and IL-9.[134] The challenge ahead for selective JAK3 inhibitors remains proof of efficacy and a reduction of adverse effects. Based on all the evidence available, JAK2 is essential for haematopoiesis and selective inhibition was initially limited to the treatment of myeloproliferative diseases. Nonetheless, an inhibitor to both JAK1 and JAK2, baricitinib, has been tested in immune-mediated diseases and recently approved for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, although at the lower dose of 2 mg. Inhibition of both JAK1 and JAK2 catalytic activities should completely shut down all JAK-dependent cytokine receptors [Figure 3]. Indeed, baricitinib at the high dose of 4 mg was associated with an increased risk of herpes zoster and a higher incidence of malignancy, excluding non-melanoma skin cancer. The rate for the latter was higher in the 4-mg group. In addition, six patients in that group were diagnosed with lymphoma.[135] The increased risk of thrombosis associated with the high dose led the FDA to approve baricitinib only at a dose of 2 mg.[136] In contrast to the broad effects of JAK1 and/or JAK2, TYK2 appears to tightly control responses to IL-12 and IL-23 and is likely involved in type I IFN responses. Whereas TYK2 is essential for the cell surface expression of the IL-6 and the IL-10 receptor families, the signalling downstream of these receptors does not appear to require its catalytic activity. This profile makes it a highly desirable target in inflammatory diseases including IBD, psoriasis, and rheumatoid arthritis that respond to anti-p40 [IL-12/IL-23] antibodies. Indeed, a phase II study is currently under way for moderate to severe ulcerative colitis [NCT03934216]. Finally increasing our knowledge, as well as the pool of highly specific inhibitors available, could provide the basis for combination therapies. Treatment with both a TYK2 inhibitor and a JAK3 antagonist during induction may provide benefits to a broader number of patients, by simultaneously targeting the ɣc cytokines and the IL-12/IL-23 pathways. Furthermore, we would suggest that by combining a JAK3 anatagonist and a TYK2 inhibitor we could potentially reduce the required doses to achieve remission. As selectivity of most inhibitors, and indeed safety, can be negatively affected by increasing the administered doses, combining compounds that simultaneously target independent pathways may prove beneficial. Given the multifactorial and heterogeneous nature of immune mechanisms driving IBD, access to selective JAK inhibitors may support future therapeutic fine tuning of the relevant target for each individual needing personalised disease modulation.
  136 in total

Review 1.  Cytokine signaling in 2002: new surprises in the Jak/Stat pathway.

Authors:  John J O'Shea; Massimo Gadina; Robert D Schreiber
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 2.  The protein kinase complement of the human genome.

Authors:  G Manning; D B Whyte; R Martinez; T Hunter; S Sudarsanam
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-12-06       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 3.  The STATs of cancer--new molecular targets come of age.

Authors:  Hua Yu; Richard Jove
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 60.716

4.  Signaling of type II oncostatin M receptor.

Authors:  P Auguste; C Guillet; M Fourcin; C Olivier; J Veziers; A Pouplard-Barthelaix; H Gascan
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1997-06-20       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  Loss of interleukin-2-producing intestinal CD4+ T cells in inflammatory bowel disease.

Authors:  K Kusugami; T Matsuura; G A West; K R Youngman; D Rachmilewitz; C Fiocchi
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 22.682

6.  JAK2 mutation in essential thrombocythaemia: clinical associations and long-term prognostic relevance.

Authors:  Alexandra P Wolanskyj; Terra L Lasho; Susan M Schwager; Rebecca F McClure; Martha Wadleigh; Stephanie J Lee; D Gary Gilliland; Ayalew Tefferi
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 6.998

Review 7.  Jak-STAT pathways and transcriptional activation in response to IFNs and other extracellular signaling proteins.

Authors:  J E Darnell; I M Kerr; G R Stark
Journal:  Science       Date:  1994-06-03       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  A restricted role for TYK2 catalytic activity in human cytokine responses revealed by novel TYK2-selective inhibitors.

Authors:  Sue J Sohn; Kathy Barrett; Anne Van Abbema; Christine Chang; Pawan Bir Kohli; Hidenobu Kanda; Janice Smith; Yingjie Lai; Aihe Zhou; Birong Zhang; Wenqian Yang; Karen Williams; Calum Macleod; Christopher A Hurley; Janusz J Kulagowski; Nicholas Lewin-Koh; Hart S Dengler; Adam R Johnson; Nico Ghilardi; Mark Zak; Jun Liang; Wade S Blair; Steven Magnuson; Lawren C Wu
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2013-07-26       Impact factor: 5.422

Review 9.  Of genes and phenotypes: the immunological and molecular spectrum of combined immune deficiency. Defects of the gamma(c)-JAK3 signaling pathway as a model.

Authors:  L D Notarangelo; S Giliani; C Mazza; P Mella; G Savoldi; C Rodriguez-Pérez; E Mazzolari; M Fiorini; M Duse; A Plebani; A G Ugazio; M Vihinen; F Candotti; R F Schumacher
Journal:  Immunol Rev       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 12.988

10.  Fate of lymphocytes after withdrawal of tofacitinib treatment.

Authors:  Elisa Piscianz; Erica Valencic; Eva Cuzzoni; Sara De Iudicibus; Elisa De Lorenzo; Giuliana Decorti; Alberto Tommasini
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  JAK inhibition as a new treatment strategy for patients with COVID-19.

Authors:  Jin Huang; Chi Zhou; Jinniu Deng; Jianfeng Zhou
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  2022-07-03       Impact factor: 6.100

Review 2.  A Comprehensive Overview of Globally Approved JAK Inhibitors.

Authors:  Ahmed M Shawky; Faisal A Almalki; Ashraf N Abdalla; Ahmed H Abdelazeem; Ahmed M Gouda
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2022-05-06       Impact factor: 6.525

Review 3.  Management of Rheumatoid Arthritis: An Overview.

Authors:  Andrei-Flavius Radu; Simona Gabriela Bungau
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2021-10-23       Impact factor: 6.600

4.  Efficacy and Safety of Janus Kinase Inhibitors for the Treatment of Atopic Dermatitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Chenyang Li; Xun Sun; Kun Zhao; Fanxiang Meng; Lin Li; Zhenzhen Mu; Xiuping Han
Journal:  Dermatology       Date:  2021-08-27       Impact factor: 5.197

Review 5.  Inflammatory pathways in COVID-19: Mechanism and therapeutic interventions.

Authors:  Yujie Jiang; Tingmei Zhao; Xueyan Zhou; Yu Xiang; Pedro Gutierrez-Castrellon; Xuelei Ma
Journal:  MedComm (2020)       Date:  2022-08-01

6.  Randomized Controlled Trial Substudy of Cell-specific Mechanisms of Janus Kinase 1 Inhibition With Upadacitinib in the Crohn's Disease Intestinal Mucosa: Analysis From the CELEST Study.

Authors:  Daniel Aguilar; Lluís Revilla; Alba Garrido-Trigo; Julian Panés; Juan J Lozano; Núria Planell; Miriam Esteller; Ana P Lacerda; Heath Guay; James Butler; Justin Wade Davis; Azucena Salas
Journal:  Inflamm Bowel Dis       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 5.325

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.