Literature DB >> 32078070

Improvement of performance of minimum variance beamformer by introducing cross covariance estimate.

Hideyuki Hasegawa1,2, Ryo Nagaoka3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The delay-and-sum beamformer is widely used in clinical ultrasound systems to obtain ultrasonic images. To improve image quality, the minimum variance (MV) beamformer was introduced in medical ultrasound imaging. The MV beamformer determines beamformer weights from ultrasonic echo signals received by individual transducer elements in an ultrasonic probe. In the present study, the MV beamformer was investigated to improve its performance.
METHODS: In MV beamforming, a covariance matrix of echo signals received by individual elements needs to be estimated to obtain adaptive beamformer weights. To obtain a stable estimate, a total receiving aperture is divided into subarrays, and a covariance matrix is obtained using echo signals from each subarray to average covariance matrices from all subarrays. This procedure is called "subarray averaging." In the present study, a new method for estimation of the covariance matrix was proposed. In the proposed method, a covariance matrix, namely, a cross covariance matrix, is obtained using echo signals from different subarrays. Multiple covariance matrices are obtained from all different pairs of subarrays and averaged.
RESULTS: In the present study, the performance of the proposed method was evaluated by basic experiments on a phantom. Lateral spatial resolutions obtained by MV beamforming with conventional subarray averaging and the proposed method were similar. However, contrast obtained by MV beamforming with the proposed method was - 0.56 dB, which was significantly better than the - 5.06 dB obtained by MV beamforming with conventional subarray averaging.
CONCLUSION: Image contrast in MV beamforming could be improved significantly by estimating "cross" covariance matrices.

Keywords:  Covariance matrix; Image quality; Minimum variance beamforming; Subarray averaging

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32078070     DOI: 10.1007/s10396-020-01009-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)        ISSN: 1346-4523            Impact factor:   1.314


  17 in total

1.  Adaptive imaging using the generalized coherence factor.

Authors:  Pai-Chi Li; Meng-Lin Li
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.725

2.  Enhancing effect of phase coherence factor for improvement of spatial resolution in ultrasonic imaging.

Authors:  Hideyuki Hasegawa
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2015-10-07       Impact factor: 1.314

3.  Broadband minimum variance beamforming for ultrasound imaging.

Authors:  Iben Kraglund Holfort; Fredrik Gran; Jørgen Arendt Jensen
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.725

4.  Benefits of minimum-variance beamforming in medical ultrasound imaging.

Authors:  Johan-Fredrik Synnevag; Andreas Austeng; Sverre Holm
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.725

5.  Minimum variance beamforming combined with adaptive coherence weighting applied to medical ultrasound imaging.

Authors:  Babak Mohammadzadeh Asl; Ali Mahloojifar
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.725

6.  Initial phantom study on estimation of speed of sound in medium using coherence among received echo signals.

Authors:  Hideyuki Hasegawa; Ryo Nagaoka
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2019-03-08       Impact factor: 1.314

7.  Eigenspace based minimum variance beamforming applied to ultrasound imaging of acoustically hard tissues.

Authors:  Saeed Mehdizadeh; Andreas Austeng; Tonni F Johansen; Sverre Holm
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 10.048

8.  Lesion detectability in diagnostic ultrasound with short-lag spatial coherence imaging.

Authors:  Jeremy J Dahl; Dongwoon Hyun; Muyinatu Lediju; Gregg E Trahey
Journal:  Ultrason Imaging       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 1.578

9.  Performance testing of medical ultrasound equipment: fundamental vs. harmonic mode.

Authors:  M C van Wijk; J M Thijssen
Journal:  Ultrasonics       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.890

10.  Short-lag spatial coherence imaging of cardiac ultrasound data: initial clinical results.

Authors:  Muyinatu A Lediju Bell; Robi Goswami; Joseph A Kisslo; Jeremy J Dahl; Gregg E Trahey
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2013-08-09       Impact factor: 2.998

View more
  2 in total

1.  Minimum variance beamforming combined with covariance matrix-based adaptive weighting for medical ultrasound imaging.

Authors:  Yuanguo Wang; Yadan Wang; Mingzhou Liu; Zhengfeng Lan; Chichao Zheng; Hu Peng
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2022-06-18       Impact factor: 3.903

Review 2.  Advances in ultrasonography: image formation and quality assessment.

Authors:  Hideyuki Hasegawa
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2021-10-20       Impact factor: 1.314

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.