Literature DB >> 12160006

Performance testing of medical ultrasound equipment: fundamental vs. harmonic mode.

M C van Wijk1, J M Thijssen.   

Abstract

Assessment of the performance of medical ultrasound equipment is generally based on the image quality in fundamental mode. Recent development of the so-called tissue harmonic imaging (THI) mode induces the need for assessment of differences in the quality of imaging in THI vs. fundamental imaging mode. Quality features to be tested are sensitivity (penetration depth), spatial resolution, contrast resolution, lesion signal-to-noise ratio, and tissue-to-clutter ratio (TCR). These features are explained and examples are shown. The main conclusion from a comparison of the results for the two imaging modes might be that when using THI improvement of TCR, in particular in the near field, is obtained at the expense of a loss in axial resolution. Furthermore, lesion detection is not significantly improved.

Entities:  

Year:  2002        PMID: 12160006     DOI: 10.1016/s0041-624x(02)00177-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasonics        ISSN: 0041-624X            Impact factor:   2.890


  15 in total

1.  Robust Short-Lag Spatial Coherence Imaging of Breast Ultrasound Data: Initial Clinical Results.

Authors:  Alycen Wiacek; Ole Marius Hoel Rindal; Eniola Falomo; Kelly Myers; Kelly Fabrega-Foster; Susan Harvey; Muyinatu A Lediju Bell
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 2.725

2.  Mechanical and clinical performance of pulse-inversion tissue harmonic imaging in the superficial region.

Authors:  Chieko Sugawara; Akira Takahashi
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2010-03-18       Impact factor: 1.314

3.  Quality control of ultrasound transducers: analysis of evaluation parameters and results of a survey of 116 transducers in a single hospital.

Authors:  P Cozzolino; R Stramare; A Udilano; M Castoro; E Scagliori; V Beltrame; L Rubaltelli
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2010-02-22       Impact factor: 3.469

4.  Apodized adaptive beamformer.

Authors:  Hideyuki Hasegawa
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 1.314

5.  Stolt's f-k migration for plane wave ultrasound imaging.

Authors:  Damien Garcia; Louis Le Tarnec; Stéphan Muth; Emmanuel Montagnon; Jonathan Porée; Guy Cloutier
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.725

6.  Improvement of penetration of modified amplitude and phase estimation beamformer.

Authors:  Hideyuki Hasegawa
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 1.314

7.  Impact of element pitch on synthetic aperture ultrasound imaging.

Authors:  Hideyuki Hasegawa; Chris L de Korte
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2016-02-20       Impact factor: 1.314

8.  Improvement of performance of minimum variance beamformer by introducing cross covariance estimate.

Authors:  Hideyuki Hasegawa; Ryo Nagaoka
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 1.314

9.  Quantitative assessment of the magnitude, impact and spatial extent of ultrasonic clutter.

Authors:  Muyinatu A Lediju; Michael J Pihl; Jeremy J Dahl; Gregg E Trahey
Journal:  Ultrason Imaging       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.578

10.  Critical US visibility with tissue harmonic imaging of subcutaneous nodules().

Authors:  S M Stella; B Ciampi; D Melchiorre; E Benedetti; E Orsitto; P V Lippolis
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2011-06-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.