Literature DB >> 30848399

Initial phantom study on estimation of speed of sound in medium using coherence among received echo signals.

Hideyuki Hasegawa1, Ryo Nagaoka2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Ultrasound beamforming is required to obtain clinical ultrasound images. In the beamforming procedure, the distance between the receiving focal point and each transducer element is determined based on the assumed speed of sound in the tissue. However, the actual speed of sound in tissue is unknown and varies depending on the tissue type. To improve the performance of an ultrasonic beamformer by evaluating its focusing quality, the coherence factor (CF) was introduced in medical ultrasound imaging. The CF may be used to estimate the speed of sound in tissue because it can identify focusing errors in beamforming. In the present study, the feasibility of CF for estimating the speed of sound was examined through phantom experiments.
METHOD: To evaluate the dependency of CF on the assumed speed of sound in ultrasound beamforming, beamformed ultrasonic radio frequency (RF) signals and CFs were obtained at different assumed speeds of sound. CF is highest when the assumed speed of sound matches the true speed of sound in the medium. Therefore, the speed of sound in the medium was determined as the assumed speed of sound, which gives the highest CF. The proposed method was validated in a conventional line-by-line sequence with a focused transmit beam and ultrafast plane wave imaging.
RESULTS: A homogeneous phantom (diffuse scattering medium) with a known speed of sound of 1540 m/s was used for validating the proposed method. Beamformed ultrasonic RF signals and CFs were obtained at an assumed speed of sound from 1480 to 1600 m/s varied at a pitch of 5 m/s. In the line-by-line sequence, CF reached the maximum at an assumed speed of sound of 1525.0 m/s (0.97% difference from the true value) when CFs at all spatial points in the region of interest (ROI) were averaged. On the other hand, the speed of sound was determined to be 1528.5 m/s (0.75% difference) when CFs at spatial points with CF-weighted echo amplitudes were larger than 20% of the maximum value. In plane wave imaging, the speed of sound was estimated to be 1544.5 m/s (0.29% difference) using CFs with CF-weighted echo amplitudes larger than 20% of the maximum value.
CONCLUSION: The speed of sound of a homogeneous medium could be determined by the proposed method with errors of less than 1% using CFs obtained from ultrasonic echo signals selected based on the CF-weighted echo amplitudes, i.e., when echo signals with better signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) were used.

Keywords:  Coherence factor; Speed of sound; Ultrasonic beamforming

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30848399     DOI: 10.1007/s10396-019-00936-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)        ISSN: 1346-4523            Impact factor:   1.314


  18 in total

1.  Ultrasonic wave speed measurement using the time-delay profile of rf-backscattered signals: simulation and experimental results.

Authors:  Fernando R Pereira; João C Machado; Wagner C A Pereira
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Adaptive imaging using the generalized coherence factor.

Authors:  Pai-Chi Li; Meng-Lin Li
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.725

3.  Enhancement of photoacoustic image quality by sound speed correction: ex vivo evaluation.

Authors:  Changhan Yoon; Jeeun Kang; Seunghee Han; Yangmo Yoo; Tai-Kyong Song; Jin Ho Chang
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2012-01-30       Impact factor: 3.894

4.  Phase aberration correction using near-field signal redundancy. I. Principles [Ultrasound medical imaging].

Authors:  Y Li
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.725

5.  Time reversal of speckle noise.

Authors:  Gabriel Montaldo; Mickael Tanter; Mathias Fink
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 9.161

6.  A transaxial compression technique (TACT) for localized pulse-echo estimation of sound speed in biological tissues.

Authors:  J Ophir; Y Yazdi
Journal:  Ultrason Imaging       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 1.578

7.  Lesion detectability in diagnostic ultrasound with short-lag spatial coherence imaging.

Authors:  Jeremy J Dahl; Dongwoon Hyun; Muyinatu Lediju; Gregg E Trahey
Journal:  Ultrason Imaging       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 1.578

8.  A CT based correction method for speed of sound aberration for ultrasound based image guided radiotherapy.

Authors:  Davide Fontanarosa; Skadi van der Meer; Emma Harris; Frank Verhaegen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  In vivo breast sound-speed imaging with ultrasound tomography.

Authors:  Cuiping Li; Nebojsa Duric; Peter Littrup; Lianjie Huang
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2009-08-03       Impact factor: 2.998

10.  Short-lag spatial coherence imaging of cardiac ultrasound data: initial clinical results.

Authors:  Muyinatu A Lediju Bell; Robi Goswami; Joseph A Kisslo; Jeremy J Dahl; Gregg E Trahey
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2013-08-09       Impact factor: 2.998

View more
  3 in total

1.  Improvement of performance of minimum variance beamformer by introducing cross covariance estimate.

Authors:  Hideyuki Hasegawa; Ryo Nagaoka
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 1.314

Review 2.  Advances in ultrasonography: image formation and quality assessment.

Authors:  Hideyuki Hasegawa
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2021-10-20       Impact factor: 1.314

Review 3.  Basic concept and clinical applications of quantitative ultrasound (QUS) technologies.

Authors:  Tadashi Yamaguchi
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2021-10-20       Impact factor: 1.314

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.