Literature DB >> 32076667

Patient Orientation Affects Lead-Tip Heating of Cardiac Active Implantable Medical Devices during MRI.

Jessica A Martinez1, Peter Serano1, Daniel B Ennis1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate changes in patient orientation to mitigate radiofrequency-induced lead-tip heating (LTH) during MRI.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: LTH was evaluated for device type, lead path, and distance to the isocenter of a 1.5-T MRI system. LTH for 378 conditions in both head-first (HF) and feet-first (FF) orientations was measured for nine MRI-unsafe cardiac active implantable medical devices (AIMDs) placed along three (two anatomic, one planar) left-sided lead paths at nine landmark locations. The devices were exposed to 5 minutes of continuous radiofrequency energy at 4 W/kg whole-body specific absorption rate.
RESULTS: LTH was greater in HF than in FF orientation for the planar and one anatomic lead path (P < .05). LTH was significantly affected by lead path, distance to isocenter, and patient orientation (all P < .05), but not by cardiac AIMD device type. Maximum LTH was observed in an HF orientation for the planar lead path when the lead tip was at isocenter (right ventricular [RV] lead: 32.0 °C ± 16.3 [standard deviation], right atrial [RA] lead: 16.1°C ± 9.3). In the FF orientation, LTH was significantly reduced (RV lead: 1.6°C ± 1.4; mean RA lead: 0.5°C ± 1.0; P = .008).
CONCLUSION: LTH for supine FF patient orientations among patients with anterior left-sided cardiac AIMDs can be significantly lower than LTH for supine HF orientations. There was no scenario in which LTH was significantly worse in the FF position. Changing patient orientation is a simple method to reduce radiofrequency-induced LTH.© RSNA, 2019See also the commentary by Litt in this issue. 2019 by the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 32076667      PMCID: PMC6735361          DOI: 10.1148/ryct.2019190006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging        ISSN: 2638-6135


  22 in total

1.  RF-induced temperature elevation along metallic wires in clinical magnetic resonance imaging: influence of diameter and length.

Authors:  Cristina Armenean; Emmanuel Perrin; Mircea Armenean; Olivier Beuf; Frank Pilleul; Hervé Saint-Jalmes
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 2.  MRI-induced heating of selected thin wire metallic implants-- laboratory and computational studies-- findings and new questions raised.

Authors:  H Bassen; W Kainz; G Mendoza; T Kellom
Journal:  Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.442

3.  Temperature and SAR measurement errors in the evaluation of metallic linear structures heating during MRI using fluoroptic probes.

Authors:  E Mattei; M Triventi; G Calcagnini; F Censi; W Kainz; H I Bassen; P Bartolini
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2007-02-27       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Permanent pacemaker implantation technique: part I: arrhythmias.

Authors:  Kim Rajappan
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 5.994

5.  In vitro investigation of pacemaker lead heating induced by magnetic resonance imaging: role of implant geometry.

Authors:  Giovanni Calcagnini; Michele Triventi; Federica Censi; Eugenio Mattei; Pietro Bartolini; Wolfgang Kainz; Howard I Bassen
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  Role of the lead structure in MRI-induced heating: In vitro measurements on 30 commercial pacemaker/defibrillator leads.

Authors:  Eugenio Mattei; Giovanni Calcagnini; Federica Censi; Michele Triventi; Pietro Bartolini
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2011-07-11       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  A prospective evaluation of a protocol for magnetic resonance imaging of patients with implanted cardiac devices.

Authors:  Saman Nazarian; Rozann Hansford; Ariel Roguin; Dorith Goldsher; Menekhem M Zviman; Albert C Lardo; Brian S Caffo; Kevin D Frick; Michael A Kraut; Ihab R Kamel; Hugh Calkins; Ronald D Berger; David A Bluemke; Henry R Halperin
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2011-10-04       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Clinical utility and safety of a protocol for noncardiac and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging of patients with permanent pacemakers and implantable-cardioverter defibrillators at 1.5 tesla.

Authors:  Saman Nazarian; Ariel Roguin; Menekhem M Zviman; Albert C Lardo; Timm L Dickfeld; Hugh Calkins; Robert G Weiss; Ronald D Berger; David A Bluemke; Henry R Halperin
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2006-09-11       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Safety and utility of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices.

Authors:  Jordan B Strom; Jill B Whelan; Changyu Shen; Shuang Qi Zheng; Koenraad J Mortele; Daniel B Kramer
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 6.343

10.  Complexity of MRI induced heating on metallic leads: experimental measurements of 374 configurations.

Authors:  Eugenio Mattei; Michele Triventi; Giovanni Calcagnini; Federica Censi; Wolfgang Kainz; Gonzalo Mendoza; Howard I Bassen; Pietro Bartolini
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2008-03-03       Impact factor: 2.819

View more
  2 in total

1.  Can a Simple Flip Make a Difference in MRI Safety in Patients with Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices?

Authors:  Harold I Litt
Journal:  Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging       Date:  2019-08-29

2.  Safety of MRI in patients with retained cardiac leads.

Authors:  Bach T Nguyen; Bhumi Bhusal; Amir Ali Rahsepar; Kate Fawcett; Stella Lin; Daniel S Marks; Rod Passman; Donny Nieto; Richard Niemzcura; Laleh Golestanirad
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2021-12-27       Impact factor: 3.737

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.