PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of the geometry of implantable pacemakers (PMs) on lead heating induced by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In vitro experiments were conducted with two different setups, using fluoroptic probes to measure the temperature increase. The first experiment consisted of a rectangular box filled with a gelled saline and a pacemaker with its leads. This box was exposed in an MRI birdcage coil to a sinusoidal 64-MHz field with a calibrated whole-body specific absorption rate (WB-SAR) of 1 W/kg. The highest SAR and temperature increase (3000 W/kg, 12 degrees C) occurred for the implant configuration having the largest area. The second experimental setup consisted of a human-shaped torso filled with gelled saline. In this setup the PM and its lead were exposed to a real MRI scanner, using clinical sequences with WB-SAR up to 2 W/kg. RESULTS: We found that higher heating occurs for configurations with longer exposed lead lengths and that right chest PMs showed the highest temperature and local SAR (11.9 degrees C, 2345 W/kg), whereas the left chest PMs were less heated (6.3 degrees C, 1362 W/kg). Implant geometry, exposed lead length, and lead area must be considered in the wide variation of temperature increases induced by MRI. CONCLUSIONS: The amount of MRI-induced lead tip heating depends strongly on implant geometry, particularly the lead area, exposed lead length, and position of the implant in the phantom. Critical lead tip heating was found for the longer leads. Therefore, to minimize MRI-induced lead tip heating, the PM lead should be as short as possible. (c) 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of the geometry of implantable pacemakers (PMs) on lead heating induced by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In vitro experiments were conducted with two different setups, using fluoroptic probes to measure the temperature increase. The first experiment consisted of a rectangular box filled with a gelled saline and a pacemaker with its leads. This box was exposed in an MRI birdcage coil to a sinusoidal 64-MHz field with a calibrated whole-body specific absorption rate (WB-SAR) of 1 W/kg. The highest SAR and temperature increase (3000 W/kg, 12 degrees C) occurred for the implant configuration having the largest area. The second experimental setup consisted of a human-shaped torso filled with gelled saline. In this setup the PM and its lead were exposed to a real MRI scanner, using clinical sequences with WB-SAR up to 2 W/kg. RESULTS: We found that higher heating occurs for configurations with longer exposed lead lengths and that right chest PMs showed the highest temperature and local SAR (11.9 degrees C, 2345 W/kg), whereas the left chest PMs were less heated (6.3 degrees C, 1362 W/kg). Implant geometry, exposed lead length, and lead area must be considered in the wide variation of temperature increases induced by MRI. CONCLUSIONS: The amount of MRI-induced lead tip heating depends strongly on implant geometry, particularly the lead area, exposed lead length, and position of the implant in the phantom. Critical lead tip heating was found for the longer leads. Therefore, to minimize MRI-induced lead tip heating, the PM lead should be as short as possible. (c) 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Authors: Laleh Golestanirad; Leonardo M Angelone; Maria Ida Iacono; Husam Katnani; Lawrence L Wald; Giorgio Bonmassar Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2016-10-31 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Laleh Golestanirad; Leonardo M Angelone; John Kirsch; Sean Downs; Boris Keil; Giorgio Bonmassar; Lawrence L Wald Journal: IEEE Trans Microw Theory Tech Date: 2019-01-01 Impact factor: 3.599
Authors: Alexandre Boutet; Clement T Chow; Keshav Narang; Gavin J B Elias; Clemens Neudorfer; Jürgen Germann; Manish Ranjan; Aaron Loh; Alastair J Martin; Walter Kucharczyk; Christopher J Steele; Ileana Hancu; Ali R Rezai; Andres M Lozano Journal: Radiology Date: 2020-06-23 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Amir Ali Rahsepar; Stefan L Zimmerman; Rozann Hansford; Michael A Guttman; Valeria Castro; Diana McVeigh; John E Kirsch; Henry R Halperin; Saman Nazarian Journal: Radiology Date: 2020-03-03 Impact factor: 29.146