Michael Cassara1, Kimberly Schertzer2, Michael J Falk3, Ambrose H Wong4, Sara M Hock5, Suzanne Bentley6, Glenn Paetow7, Lauren W Conlon8, Patrick G Hughes9, Ryan T McKenna10, Michael Hrdy3, Charles Lei11, Miriam Kulkarni12, Colleen M Smith13, Amanda Young14, Ernesto Romo15, Michael D Smith16, Jessica Hernandez17, Christopher G Strother13, Alise Frallicciardi18, Nur-Ain Nadir19. 1. Northwell Health/Zucker School of Medicine Manhasset NY. 2. Stanford University School of Medicine Palo Alto CA. 3. Children's National Medical Center Washington DC. 4. Yale School of Medicine New Haven CT. 5. Rush University Medical Center Chicago IL. 6. Elmhurst Hospital Center/Icahn School of Medicine at Mt Sinai Elmhurst NY. 7. Hennepin County Medical Minneapolis MN. 8. University of Pennsylvania/Perelman School of Medicine Philadelphia PA. 9. Florida Atlantic University Charles E. Schmidt College of Medicine Boca Raton FL. 10. University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine Tampa FL. 11. Vanderbilt University School of Medicine Nashville TN. 12. St. John's Riverside Hospital Yonkers NY. 13. Mount Sinai Hospital/Icahn School of Medicine at Mt Sinai New York NY. 14. University of Arkansas for Health Sciences Little Rock AR. 15. Washington University in St. Louis St. Louis MO. 16. Ochsner Health System/St Charles Parish Hospital Luling LA. 17. University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Dallas TX. 18. University of Connecticut School of Medicine UConn Health Farmington CT. 19. Kaiser Permanente Central Valley/Kaiser Permanente School of Medicine Pasadena CA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Procedural competency is an essential prerequisite for the independent practice of emergency medicine. Multiple studies demonstrate that simulation-based procedural training (SBPT) is an effective method for acquiring and maintaining procedural competency and preferred over traditional paradigms ("see one, do one, teach one"). Although newer paradigms informing SBPT have emerged, educators often face circumstances that challenge and undermine their implementation. The goal of this paper is to identify and report on best practices and theory-supported solutions to some of these challenges as derived using a process of expert consensus building and reviews of the existing literature on SBPT. METHODS: The Society for Academic Emergency Medicine (SAEM) Simulation Academy SBPT Workgroup convened approximately 8 months prior to the 2019 SAEM Annual Meeting to perform a review of the literature and participate in a consensus-building process to identify solutions (in the form of best practices and educational theory) to these challenges faced by educators engaging in SBPT. RESULTS AND ANALYSIS: Thirteen distinct educational challenges to SBPT emerged from the expert group's primary literature reviews and consensus-building processes. Three domains emerged upon further analysis of the 13 challenges: learner, educator, and curriculum. Six challenges within the "learner" domain were selected for comprehensive discussion in this paper, as they were deemed representative of the most common and most significant threats to ideal SBPT. Each of the six challenges aligns with one of the following themes: 1) maximizing active learning, 2) maintaining learner engagement, 3) embracing learner diversity, 4) optimizing cognitive load, 5) promoting mindfulness and reflection, and 6) emphasizing deliberate practice for mastery learning. Over 20 "special treatments" for mitigating the impact of the 13 challenges were derived from the secondary literature search and consensus-building process prior to and during the preconference workshop; 11 of these that best address the six learner-centered challenges are explored, including implications for educators involved in SBPT. CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS FOR EDUCATORS: We propose multiple consensus-generated solutions (in the form of best practices and applied educational theory) that we believe are suitable and well aligned to overcome commonly encountered learner-centered challenges and threats to optimal SBPT.
OBJECTIVES: Procedural competency is an essential prerequisite for the independent practice of emergency medicine. Multiple studies demonstrate that simulation-based procedural training (SBPT) is an effective method for acquiring and maintaining procedural competency and preferred over traditional paradigms ("see one, do one, teach one"). Although newer paradigms informing SBPT have emerged, educators often face circumstances that challenge and undermine their implementation. The goal of this paper is to identify and report on best practices and theory-supported solutions to some of these challenges as derived using a process of expert consensus building and reviews of the existing literature on SBPT. METHODS: The Society for Academic Emergency Medicine (SAEM) Simulation Academy SBPT Workgroup convened approximately 8 months prior to the 2019 SAEM Annual Meeting to perform a review of the literature and participate in a consensus-building process to identify solutions (in the form of best practices and educational theory) to these challenges faced by educators engaging in SBPT. RESULTS AND ANALYSIS: Thirteen distinct educational challenges to SBPT emerged from the expert group's primary literature reviews and consensus-building processes. Three domains emerged upon further analysis of the 13 challenges: learner, educator, and curriculum. Six challenges within the "learner" domain were selected for comprehensive discussion in this paper, as they were deemed representative of the most common and most significant threats to ideal SBPT. Each of the six challenges aligns with one of the following themes: 1) maximizing active learning, 2) maintaining learner engagement, 3) embracing learner diversity, 4) optimizing cognitive load, 5) promoting mindfulness and reflection, and 6) emphasizing deliberate practice for mastery learning. Over 20 "special treatments" for mitigating the impact of the 13 challenges were derived from the secondary literature search and consensus-building process prior to and during the preconference workshop; 11 of these that best address the six learner-centered challenges are explored, including implications for educators involved in SBPT. CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS FOR EDUCATORS: We propose multiple consensus-generated solutions (in the form of best practices and applied educational theory) that we believe are suitable and well aligned to overcome commonly encountered learner-centered challenges and threats to optimal SBPT.
Authors: Angelo Mikrogianakis; April Kam; Shawna Silver; Balisi Bakanisi; Oscar Henao; Allan Okrainec; Georges Azzie Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2011-04 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: Steve McLaughlin; Michael T Fitch; Deepi G Goyal; Emily Hayden; Christine Yang Kauh; Torrey A Laack; Thomas Nowicki; Yasuharu Okuda; Ken Palm; Charles N Pozner; John Vozenilek; Ernest Wang; James A Gordon Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2008-07-14 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: Yasuharu Okuda; William Bond; Gary Bonfante; Steve McLaughlin; Linda Spillane; Ernest Wang; John Vozenilek; James A Gordon Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2008-08-20 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: Jeffrey H Barsuk; William C McGaghie; Elaine R Cohen; Jayshankar S Balachandran; Diane B Wayne Journal: J Hosp Med Date: 2009-09 Impact factor: 2.960
Authors: David A Cook; Rose Hatala; Ryan Brydges; Benjamin Zendejas; Jason H Szostek; Amy T Wang; Patricia J Erwin; Stanley J Hamstra Journal: JAMA Date: 2011-09-07 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Margje W J van de Wiel; Piet Van den Bossche; Sandra Janssen; Helen Jossberger Journal: Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract Date: 2010-09-18 Impact factor: 3.853
Authors: Robert James Adrian; April Choi; Sangeeta Lamba; Ilya Ostrovsky; Christine Ramdin; Christin Traba; Sophia Chen; Alexander Sudyn; Stephen Alerhand Journal: MedEdPORTAL Date: 2022-02-02