Literature DB >> 21496146

Telesimulation: an innovative and effective tool for teaching novel intraosseous insertion techniques in developing countries.

Angelo Mikrogianakis1, April Kam, Shawna Silver, Balisi Bakanisi, Oscar Henao, Allan Okrainec, Georges Azzie.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Telesimulation is a novel concept coupling the principles of simulation with remote Internet access to teach procedural skills. This study's objective was to determine if telesimulation could be used by pediatricians in Toronto, Ontario, Canada, to teach a relatively new intraosseous (IO) insertion technique to physicians in Africa.
METHODS: One simulator was located in Toronto and the other in Gaborone, Botswana. Instructors and trainees could see one another, see inside each other's simulators, and communicate in real time. Learner's opinions and skills were evaluated. Before and after the curriculum, physicians completed a self-assessment questionnaire, a multiple-choice test, and during session 3, a demonstration of competence using an IO infusion system was timed and scored locally and via the Internet.
RESULTS: Twenty-two physicians participated. The scores on the pretest ranged from 1 to 12 out of 15. The range of scores on the posttest was 10 to 15 out of 15. The mean (±SD) score on pre- and post-multiple choice testing increased by +5 (±2.75; 95% confidence interval [CI] for mean difference = 3.92 to 6.35). Based on McNemar's chi-square test, physicians reported a significant improvement in their comfort and knowledge inserting IO needles (p < 0.01), familiarity with the EZ-IO infusion system (p < 0.01), and knowledge handling the IO equipment (p < 0.01). Postintervention, all physicians reported that telesimulation teaching was a worthwhile experience, and 95% felt more prepared to manage pediatric resuscitation. There was no evidence of a difference in scoring or timing of IO insertion tasks whether measured locally or remotely (mean ± SD score difference = -0.11 ± 1.22 [95% CI = -0.66 to 0.43]; mean ± sd time difference = 0.01 ± 0.15 seconds [95% CI = -0.06 to 0.08 seconds]).
CONCLUSIONS: Telesimulation is a novel method for teaching procedural skills. The session improved physicians' knowledge, self-reported confidence, and comfort level in inserting the IO needle. Accurate scoring is possible via the Internet. This modality offers potential for teaching other procedural skills over distances.
© 2011 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21496146     DOI: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01038.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Emerg Med        ISSN: 1069-6563            Impact factor:   3.451


  26 in total

Review 1.  Pediatric Resuscitation Education in Low-Middle-Income Countries: Effective Strategies for Successful Program Development.

Authors:  Julianna Jung; Nicole Shilkofski
Journal:  J Pediatr Intensive Care       Date:  2016-06-20

2.  Telesimulation: A Paradigm Shift for Simulation Education.

Authors:  Dimitrios Papanagnou
Journal:  AEM Educ Train       Date:  2017-04-06

3.  Telesimulation: An Innovative Tool for Health Professions Education.

Authors:  Christopher Eric McCoy; Julie Sayegh; Rola Alrabah; Lalena M Yarris
Journal:  AEM Educ Train       Date:  2017-02-17

4.  A Simple Low-Cost Method to Integrate Telehealth Interprofessional Team Members During In Situ Simulation.

Authors:  William F Bond; Lisa T Barker; Kimberly L Cooley; Jessica D Svendsen; William P Tillis; Andrew L Vincent; John A Vozenilek; Emilie S Powell
Journal:  Simul Healthc       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 1.929

Review 5.  Pediatric Trauma Care in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Brief Review of the Current State and Recommendations for Management and a Way Forward.

Authors:  Andrew W Kiragu; Stephen J Dunlop; Benjamin W Wachira; Seno I Saruni; Michael Mwachiro; Tina Slusher
Journal:  J Pediatr Intensive Care       Date:  2016-06-24

6.  Telementoring for remote simulation instructor training and faculty development using telesimulation.

Authors:  Isabel Theresia Gross; Travis Whitfill; Luize Auzina; Marc Auerbach; Reinis Balmaks
Journal:  BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn       Date:  2020-05-18

7.  Lessons learned from organizing and evaluating international virtual training for healthcare professionals.

Authors:  Tamara Galoyan; Lynn Kysh; Armine Lulejian; James Dickhoner; Abu Sikder; Mindy Lee; Eyal Ben-Isaac; Juan Espinoza
Journal:  Int J Med Educ       Date:  2022-03-31

8.  Applying Educational Theory and Best Practices to Solve Common Challenges of Simulation-based Procedural Training in Emergency Medicine.

Authors:  Michael Cassara; Kimberly Schertzer; Michael J Falk; Ambrose H Wong; Sara M Hock; Suzanne Bentley; Glenn Paetow; Lauren W Conlon; Patrick G Hughes; Ryan T McKenna; Michael Hrdy; Charles Lei; Miriam Kulkarni; Colleen M Smith; Amanda Young; Ernesto Romo; Michael D Smith; Jessica Hernandez; Christopher G Strother; Alise Frallicciardi; Nur-Ain Nadir
Journal:  AEM Educ Train       Date:  2019-12-27

9.  TeleSimBox: A perceived effective alternative for experiential learning for medical student education with social distancing requirements.

Authors:  Elizabeth Sanseau; Megan Lavoie; Khoon-Yen Tay; Grace Good; Suzana Tsao; Rebekah Burns; Anita Thomas; Tanner Heckle; Meghan Wilson; Maybelle Kou; Marc Auerbach
Journal:  AEM Educ Train       Date:  2021-04-01

10.  Prospective Randomized Crossover Study of Telesimulation Versus Standard Simulation for Teaching Medical Students the Management of Critically Ill Patients.

Authors:  C Eric McCoy; Julie Sayegh; Asif Rahman; Mark Landgorf; Craig Anderson; Shahram Lotfipour
Journal:  AEM Educ Train       Date:  2017-08-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.