Literature DB >> 32043195

The good, the bad and the rude peer-review.

Andreas F Mavrogenis1, Andrew Quaile2, Marius M Scarlat3.   

Abstract

Year:  2020        PMID： 32043195     DOI： 10.1007/s00264-020-04504-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN： 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


× No keyword cloud information.
  20 in total

1.  Open peer review: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  E Walsh; M Rooney; L Appleby; G Wilkinson
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 9.319

2.  Ethical responsibilities of editors, reviewers, and authors.

Authors:  H R Cowell
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  Stereotype Threat.

Authors:  Steven J Spencer; Christine Logel; Paul G Davies
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 24.137

4.  US and non-US submissions: an analysis of reviewer bias.

Authors:  A M Link
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-07-15       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  How to evaluate reviewers - the international orthopedics reviewers score (INOR-RS).

Authors:  Andreas F Mavrogenis; Jing Sun; Andrew Quaile; Marius M Scarlat
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Stereotype threat and health disparities: what medical educators and future physicians need to know.

Authors:  Diana J Burgess; Jennifer Warren; Sean Phelan; John Dovidio; Michelle van Ryn
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Does stereotype threat affect test performance of minorities and women? A meta-analysis of experimental evidence.

Authors:  Hannah-Hanh D Nguyen; Ann Marie Ryan
Journal:  J Appl Psychol       Date:  2008-11

Review 8.  Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals.

Authors:  Richard Smith
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 18.000

9.  Cooperation between referees and authors increases peer review accuracy.

Authors:  Jeffrey T Leek; Margaret A Taub; Fernando J Pineda
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented groups in STEM.

Authors:  Nyssa J Silbiger; Amber D Stubler
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-12-12       Impact factor: 2.984
View more
  10 in total

1.  Opportunities to enhance peer review.

Authors:  Sarah Fraser
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2022-09       Impact factor: 3.025

2.  The editor endeavours, aims and standards in a surgery journal: our experience with "International Orthopaedics" and the Société Internationale de Chirurgie Orthopédique et de Traumatologie publications.

Authors:  Andreas F Mavrogenis; Marius M Scarlat
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2022-06       Impact factor: 3.479

Review 3.  Individual integrity and public morality in scientific publishing.

Authors:  Sergio Della-Sala
Journal:  Dement Neuropsychol       Date:  2022-05-13

4.  Useful and useless publications measured by bibliometrics and scientometrics in orthopaedic surgery. Are the relevance of a journal and publication metrics useful enough for the scientific promotion of surgeons?

Authors:  Andreas F Mavrogenis; Marco Pećina; Wei Chen; Marius M Scarlat
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Peer review guidance: a primer for researchers.

Authors:  Olena Zimba; Armen Yuri Gasparyan
Journal:  Reumatologia       Date:  2021-02-28

6.  JID Innovations and Peer Review.

Authors:  Russell P Hall
Journal:  JID Innov       Date:  2021-10-01

7.  Writing for "International Orthopaedics": authorship, fraud, and ethical concerns.

Authors:  Andreas F Mavrogenis; Marius M Scarlat
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2021-10       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Stress, anxiety, and burnout of orthopaedic surgeons in COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Andreas F Mavrogenis; Marius M Scarlat
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2022-05       Impact factor: 3.479

9.  Overcoming Language Barriers in Academia: Machine Translation Tools and a Vision for a Multilingual Future.

Authors:  Emma Steigerwald; Valeria Ramírez-Castañeda; Débora Y C Brandt; András Báldi; Julie Teresa Shapiro; Lynne Bowker; Rebecca D Tarvin
Journal:  Bioscience       Date:  2022-08-03       Impact factor: 11.566

10.  Optimizing peer review to minimize the risk of retracting COVID-19-related literature.

Authors:  Jaime A Teixeira da Silva; Helmar Bornemann-Cimenti; Panagiotis Tsigaris
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2020-11-20
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.