Literature DB >> 31273429

How to evaluate reviewers - the international orthopedics reviewers score (INOR-RS).

Andreas F Mavrogenis1, Jing Sun2, Andrew Quaile3, Marius M Scarlat4.   

Abstract

Year:  2019        PMID： 31273429     DOI： 10.1007/s00264-019-04374-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN： 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


× No keyword cloud information.
  18 in total

1.  Effect of blinding and unmasking on the quality of peer review.

Authors:  S Van Rooyen; F Godlee; S Evans; R Smith; N Black
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 2.  Reviewing for clinical orthopaedics and related research.

Authors:  Richard A Brand
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Reviewing the reviewers: comparison of review quality and reviewer characteristics at the American Journal of Roentgenology.

Authors:  Mark A Kliewer; Kelly S Freed; David M DeLong; Perry J Pickhardt; James M Provenzale
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Differences in review quality and recommendations for publication between peer reviewers suggested by authors or by editors.

Authors:  Sara Schroter; Leanne Tite; Andrew Hutchings; Nick Black
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-01-18       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  US and non-US submissions: an analysis of reviewer bias.

Authors:  A M Link
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-07-15       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers' recommendations: a randomised trial.

Authors:  S van Rooyen; F Godlee; S Evans; N Black; R Smith
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-01-02

7.  Reviews, reviewers and reviewing.

Authors:  Ancuţa Zazgyva; Elizaveta Kon; Cyril Mauffrey; Andreas F Mavrogenis; Marius M Scarlat
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  The characteristics of peer reviewers who produce good-quality reviews.

Authors:  A T Evans; R A McNutt; S W Fletcher; R H Fletcher
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 9.  Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals.

Authors:  Richard Smith
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 18.000

10.  The Global Burden of Journal Peer Review in the Biomedical Literature: Strong Imbalance in the Collective Enterprise.

Authors:  Michail Kovanis; Raphaël Porcher; Philippe Ravaud; Ludovic Trinquart
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 3.240
View more
  6 in total

1.  Equal access to orthopaedic research funding, databases and scientific publications.

Authors:  Marius M Scarlat; Cyril Mauffrey; Andreas Mavrogenis
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  The good, the bad and the rude peer-review.

Authors:  Andreas F Mavrogenis; Andrew Quaile; Marius M Scarlat
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  The editor endeavours, aims and standards in a surgery journal: our experience with "International Orthopaedics" and the Société Internationale de Chirurgie Orthopédique et de Traumatologie publications.

Authors:  Andreas F Mavrogenis; Marius M Scarlat
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2022-06       Impact factor: 3.479

4.  Useful and useless publications measured by bibliometrics and scientometrics in orthopaedic surgery. Are the relevance of a journal and publication metrics useful enough for the scientific promotion of surgeons?

Authors:  Andreas F Mavrogenis; Marco Pećina; Wei Chen; Marius M Scarlat
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Writing for "International Orthopaedics": authorship, fraud, and ethical concerns.

Authors:  Andreas F Mavrogenis; Marius M Scarlat
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2021-10       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Stress, anxiety, and burnout of orthopaedic surgeons in COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Andreas F Mavrogenis; Marius M Scarlat
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2022-05       Impact factor: 3.479
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.