Literature DB >> 36100392

Opportunities to enhance peer review.

Sarah Fraser.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2022        PMID： 36100392      PMCID： PMC9470186          DOI： 10.46747/cfp.6809632

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Fam Physician        ISSN： 0008-350X            Impact factor:   3.025


× No keyword cloud information.
  5 in total

1.  Is Double-Blinded Peer Review Necessary? The Effect of Blinding on Review Quality.

Authors:  Kevin C Chung; Melissa J Shauver; Sunitha Malay; Lin Zhong; Aaron Weinstein; Rod J Rohrich
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 4.730

2.  The good, the bad and the rude peer-review.

Authors:  Andreas F Mavrogenis; Andrew Quaile; Marius M Scarlat
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 3.  The limitations to our understanding of peer review.

Authors:  Jonathan P Tennant; Tony Ross-Hellauer
Journal:  Res Integr Peer Rev       Date:  2020-04-30

4.  Innovative Strategies for Peer Review.

Authors:  Edward Barroga
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2020-05-25       Impact factor: 2.153

5.  Peer Review in Scientific Publications: Benefits, Critiques, & A Survival Guide.

Authors:  Jacalyn Kelly; Tara Sadeghieh; Khosrow Adeli
Journal:  EJIFCC       Date:  2014-10-24
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.