Literature DB >> 32020966

Factors associated with abutment screw loosening in single implant supported crowns: A cross-sectional study.

S M Londhe1, E Mahesh Gowda2, V B Mandlik3, M P Shashidhar4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Implant restorations are considered an ideal treatment option for replacement of missing teeth in partially edentulous patients. Abutment screw loosening is one of the frequently observed technical complications of implant-supported prosthesis. This study aimed to determine the prevalence and factors associated with the abutment screw loosening in cement-retained single-implant crowns.
METHODS: Enrolment criteria included partially edentulous patients who have been rehabilitated with one or more cement-retained single-implant crowns with minimum postcementation period of 1 year. They were recalled and evaluated for the presence or absence of screw loosening both clinically and radiographically. They were further evaluated for the presence or absence of factors associated with screw loosening such as parafunctional habits, wider occlusal table, steep cuspal inclines, non-axial loading and cantilevering of the pontic.
RESULTS: Twenty-six cement-retained single-implant crowns out of 280 showed screw loosening, making the overall prevalence rate of 10.77%. Among the factors evaluated, parafunctional habits were associated with three cases, wider occlusal table in four, steep cuspal inclines in three, non-axial loading in nine and cantilevering of the pontic in three cases. Exact reasons could not be ascertained in four cases.
CONCLUSION: Abutment screw loosening seems to be a significant prosthetic complication of cement-retained single-implant crowns. Factors evaluated significantly affect the functional durability of the prosthesis. These factors should be considered while restoring to enhance the longevity of such restorations.
© 2018 Armed Forces Medical Services (AFMS).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Abutment screw loosening; Dental implants; Single Implant crown

Year:  2018        PMID: 32020966      PMCID: PMC6994738          DOI: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2018.06.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India        ISSN: 0377-1237


  11 in total

Review 1.  Clinical complications of osseointegrated implants.

Authors:  C J Goodacre; J Y Kan; K Rungcharassaeng
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 3.426

2.  Screw loosening for standard and wide diameter implants in partially edentulous cases: 3- to 7-year longitudinal data.

Authors:  Sang-Choon Cho; Paula-Naomi Small; Nicolas Elian; Dennis Tarnow
Journal:  Implant Dent       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.454

3.  Effect of dental implant diameter on fatigue performance. Part I: mechanical behavior.

Authors:  Keren Shemtov-Yona; Daniel Rittel; Liran Levin; Eli E Machtei
Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 3.932

4.  Osseointegrated implants for single tooth replacement: a 1-year report from a multicenter prospective study.

Authors:  T Jemt; W R Laney; D Harris; P J Henry; P H Krogh; G Polizzi; G A Zarb; I Herrmann
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.804

5.  Elongation and preload stress in dental implant abutment screws.

Authors:  J E Haack; R L Sakaguchi; T Sun; J P Coffey
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  1995 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.804

6.  Wide diameter implants: indications, considerations and preliminary results over a two-year period.

Authors:  S L Graves; C E Jansen; A A Siddiqui; K D Beaty
Journal:  Aust Prosthodont J       Date:  1994

7.  Clinical complications with implants and implant prostheses.

Authors:  Charles J Goodacre; Guillermo Bernal; Kitichai Rungcharassaeng; Joseph Y K Kan
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.426

Review 8.  Comparison of survival and complication rates of tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) and implant-supported FDPs and single crowns (SCs).

Authors:  Bjarni E Pjetursson; Urs Brägger; Niklaus P Lang; Marcel Zwahlen
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 5.977

9.  Replacement of maxillary and mandibular molars with single endosseous implant restorations: a retrospective study.

Authors:  W Becker; B E Becker
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 3.426

10.  Stability of external and internal implant connections after a fatigue test.

Authors:  Paulo Cesar Pinheiro Feitosa; Ana Paula Barbosa de Lima; Laís Regiane Silva-Concílio; William Cunha Brandt; Ana Christina Claro Neves
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2013-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.