Literature DB >> 7674191

Replacement of maxillary and mandibular molars with single endosseous implant restorations: a retrospective study.

W Becker1, B E Becker.   

Abstract

This retrospective report presents findings on 22 patients with 24 implants replacing single molars with implant-supported restorations. Patients with known bruxism habits were not considered for single-molar implant replacement. The patients underwent follow-up for an average of 24 months. The cumulative success rate was 95%, which reflects the loss of one 5 x 6 mm wide implant. Eleven implants were placed in edentulous ridges, and 13 were placed in extraction sockets. Most of the implants were placed in type B and C bone quantity and type 2 and 3 bone quality. All implants were restored on abutments with nonrotating gold cylinders. The occlusion for all restorations was developed to minimize centric contacts and lateral interferences. The frequency of gold retaining-screw loosening was obtained for 21 patients. The gold retaining screws loosened in eight implants between one and three times (38%). No incidence of crown or implant fracture occurred. Within the limits of this study, replacement of single-tooth molars by implant-supported restorations was predictable; however, a high incidence of gold screw loosening was seen.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7674191     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3913(05)80229-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Prosthet Dent        ISSN: 0022-3913            Impact factor:   3.426


  21 in total

1.  Posterior partially edentulous jaws, planning a rehabilitation with dental implants.

Authors:  Douglas R Monteiro; Emily V F Silva; Eduardo P Pellizzer; Osvaldo Magro Filho; Marcelo C Goiato
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2015-01-16       Impact factor: 1.337

2.  Management of Broken Dental Implant Abutment in a Patient with Bruxism: A Rare Case Report and Review of Literature.

Authors:  Saad Al-Almaie
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2017 Jul-Sep

3.  Factors associated with abutment screw loosening in single implant supported crowns: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  S M Londhe; E Mahesh Gowda; V B Mandlik; M P Shashidhar
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2018-10-10

4.  Masticatory function following implants replacing a second molar.

Authors:  Moon-Sun Kim; Jae-Kwan Lee; Beom-Seok Chang; Heung-Sik Um
Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci       Date:  2011-04-29       Impact factor: 2.614

5.  Complication incidence of two implant systems up to six years: a comparison between internal and external connection implants.

Authors:  Sung-Wook Chae; Young-Sung Kim; Yong-Moo Lee; Won-Kyung Kim; Young-Kyoo Lee; Su-Hwan Kim
Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 2.614

6.  The Effects of New Design of Access Hole on Porcelain Fracture Resistance of Implant-Supported Crowns.

Authors:  Reza Derafshi; Mitra Farzin; Masoumeh Taghva; Hossein Heidary; Berivan Atashkar
Journal:  J Dent (Shiraz)       Date:  2015-03

7.  A new classification of peri implant gaps based on gap location (A case series of 210 immediate implants).

Authors:  Douglas Deporter; Ali Akbar Khoshkhounejad; Nikfam Khoshkhounejad; Mohammad Ketabi
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2021-04-06

8.  Early loading of single-piece implant for partially edentulous posterior arch: a prospective one-year case report.

Authors:  Amol Beldar; Manohar L Bhongade; Girish Byakod; Chandrashekar Buregoni
Journal:  Case Rep Dent       Date:  2013-04-08

9.  Consecutive Case Series of Healed Single-Molar Sites Immediately Restored with Wide-Diameter Implants: A 1-Year Evaluation.

Authors:  Hadi Antoun; Pierre Cherfane; Bouchra Sojod
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2016-04-18

Review 10.  Technical complications of implant-causes and management: A comprehensive review.

Authors:  Swati Gupta; Hemant Gupta; Amrit Tandan
Journal:  Natl J Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2015 Jan-Jun
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.