Literature DB >> 3199176

Temporal coding of resonances by low-frequency auditory nerve fibers: single-fiber responses and a population model.

L H Carney1, T C Yin.   

Abstract

1. We recorded responses of low-frequency auditory nerve fibers (characteristic frequency (CF) less than 3 kHz) in the cat to resonant stimuli with varied natural frequencies, damping coefficients, and sound pressure levels. Responses to resonances were synchronized to frequencies lying between the peak frequency of the stimulus spectrum and a frequency near the fiber's CF. The frequency of the dominant synchrony in the response varied systematically as a function of the stimulus parameters. 2. More lightly damped resonances, which have sharp spectral peaks, elicited synchrony closer to the peak frequency, whereas the broader peaks of more highly damped resonances elicited synchrony closer to the fiber's CF. Thus as the stimulus was varied from an undamped tone to a highly damped transient, the dominant component of the synchronized response moved from the peak frequency of the stimulus toward the CF of the fiber. The trajectory of the dominant component varied as a function of stimulus level, with higher levels resulting in synchrony biased toward the peak of the stimulus spectrum over a wider range of damping. 3. The frequency tuning and synchronization characteristics of a fiber, along with the stimulus parameters, determined the temporal properties of its response to complex stimuli. Using reverse correlation (revcor) filters to characterize the tuning and synchronization of auditory nerve fibers, we were able to predict the temporal properties of responses to resonant stimuli. 4. A parametric model was fit to measured revcor functions derived from responses of auditory nerve fibers to wideband noise. In this way, a bank of model revcor filters was developed based on our population of measured filters. 5. The filter bank was used to model the response of a population of auditory nerve fibers to resonances. Temporal patterns present in the response of a population of fibers encoded the parameters of resonant stimuli. 6. The model revcor filter bank provided a means of studying temporal response patterns of the population of fibers to other complex sounds. 7. The output of the population model is a representation of the temporal information provided by the auditory periphery to the central nervous system; thus it provides a potentially useful tool for testing hypotheses concerning the processing of temporal information by the central auditory system.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3199176     DOI: 10.1152/jn.1988.60.5.1653

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  42 in total

1.  Robust spectrotemporal reverse correlation for the auditory system: optimizing stimulus design.

Authors:  D J Klein; D A Depireux; J Z Simon; S A Shamma
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2000 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.621

2.  Cochlear and neural delays for coincidence detection in owls.

Authors:  J L Pena; S Viete; K Funabiki; K Saberi; M Konishi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-12-01       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  On ringing limits of the auditory periphery.

Authors:  E de Boer; C Kruidenier
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.086

4.  Ongoing temporal coding of a stochastic stimulus as a function of intensity: time-intensity trading.

Authors:  Pascal Michelet; Damir Kovacić; Philip X Joris
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Coherent reflection without traveling waves: on the origin of long-latency otoacoustic emissions in lizards.

Authors:  Christopher Bergevin; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Phase effects on the perceived elevation of complex tones.

Authors:  William M Hartmann; Virginia Best; Johahn Leung; Simon Carlile
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Maps of interaural delay in the owl's nucleus laminaris.

Authors:  Catherine E Carr; Sahil Shah; Thomas McColgan; Go Ashida; Paula T Kuokkanen; Sandra Brill; Richard Kempter; Hermann Wagner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Reverse correlation analysis of auditory-nerve fiber responses to broadband noise in a bird, the barn owl.

Authors:  Bertrand Fontaine; Christine Köppl; Jose L Peña
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-10-15

9.  Correction of the peripheral spatiotemporal response pattern: a potential new signal-processing strategy.

Authors:  Lu-Feng Shi; Laurel H Carney; Karen A Doherty
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.297

10.  Auditory filter tuning inferred with short sinusoidal and notched-noise maskers.

Authors:  Skyler G Jennings; Elizabeth A Strickland
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.