Literature DB >> 16908879

Correction of the peripheral spatiotemporal response pattern: a potential new signal-processing strategy.

Lu-Feng Shi1, Laurel H Carney, Karen A Doherty.   

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to introduce a new signal-processing strategy, spatiotemporal pattern correction (SPC), that is based on our knowledge of the level-dependent temporal response properties of auditory nerve fibers in normal and impaired ears. In normal-hearing listeners, tuning is sharp for low-level inputs and broadens as input level increases. When peripheral filters change their shape with input level, the phase properties of the filters and the latency of the filter's response also change. However, in listeners with hearing loss, tuning is broad for both low- and high-level inputs. Thus, there is little change in the phase properties of the filters for different input levels. The SPC strategy manipulates the temporal aspects of different frequency channels of sounds in an attempt to "correct" for this abnormal spatiotemporal response pattern of the impaired ear. Quality judgments and intelligibility measures of speech processed at various SPC strengths were obtained from a small group of normal-hearing listeners and listeners with hearing loss. In general, listeners with hearing loss preferred sentences with some degree of SPC processing, whereas normal-hearing listeners preferred unprocessed sentences. Benefit from SPC on the nonsense syllable test varied greatly across phonemes and listeners. A more comprehensive study of listeners with different degrees and configurations of hearing loss is needed to determine the amount of SPC benefit.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16908879      PMCID: PMC2586948          DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2006/060)

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  50 in total

1.  Inter-relationship between different psychoacoustic measures assumed to be related to the cochlear active mechanism.

Authors:  B C Moore; D A Vickers; C J Plack; A J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  The contribution of amplitude envelope cues to sentence identification in young and aged listeners.

Authors:  P E Souza; V Kitch
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Improving speech audibility with wide dynamic range compression in listeners with severe sensorineural loss.

Authors:  P E Souza; R D Bishop
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Perception of voiceless fricatives by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired children and adults.

Authors:  A L Pittman; P G Stelmachowicz
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Effect of a single-channel wide dynamic range compression circuit on perception of stop consonant place of articulation.

Authors:  M S Hedrick; T Rice
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Recognition of low-pass-filtered consonants in noise with normal and impaired high-frequency hearing.

Authors:  Amy R Horwitz; Judy R Dubno; Jayne B Ahlstrom
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Cochlear compression estimates from measurements of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Stephen T Neely; Michael P Gorga; Patricia A Dorn
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Learning to perceive speech: how fricative perception changes, and how it stays the same.

Authors:  Susan Nittrouer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Limiting spectral resolution in speech for listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.

Authors:  C W Turner; S L Chi; S Flock
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 2.297

10.  An examination of the practicality of the simplex procedure.

Authors:  J E Preminger; A C Neuman; M H Bakke; D Walters; H Levitt
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.570

View more
  3 in total

1.  Noise-induced hearing loss alters the temporal dynamics of auditory-nerve responses.

Authors:  Ryan E Scheidt; Sushrut Kale; Michael G Heinz
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-08-07       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Perception of across-frequency asynchrony by listeners with cochlear hearing loss.

Authors:  Magdalena Wojtczak; Jordan A Beim; Christophe Micheyl; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-04-24

3.  Perception of temporally processed speech by listeners with hearing impairment.

Authors:  Lauren Calandruccio; Karen A Doherty; Laurel H Carney; Harshavardhana N Kikkeri
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.570

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.