Literature DB >> 31971269

Computational modeling of the Food and Drug Administration's benchmark centrifugal blood pump.

Bryan C Good1, Keefe B Manning1,2.   

Abstract

In order to simulate hemodynamics within centrifugal blood pumps and to predict pump hemolysis, CFD simulations must be thoroughly validated against experimental data. They must also account for and accurately model the specific working fluid in the pump, whether that is a blood-analog solution to match an experimental PIV study or animal blood in a hemolysis experiment. Therefore, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) benchmark centrifugal blood pump and its database of experimental PIV and hemolysis data were used to thoroughly validate CFD simulations of the same blood pump. A Newtonian blood model was first used to compare to the PIV data with a blood analog fluid while hemolysis data were compared using a power-law hemolysis model fit to porcine blood data. A viscoelastic blood model was then incorporated into the CFD solver to investigate the importance of modeling blood's viscoelasticity in centrifugal pumps. The established computational framework, including a dynamic rotating mesh, animal blood-specific fluid properties and hemolysis modeling, and a k-ω SST turbulence model, was shown to more accurately predict pump pressure heads, velocity fields, and hemolysis compared to previously published CFD studies of the FDA centrifugal pump. The CFD simulations were able to match the FDA pressure and hemolysis data for multiple pump operating conditions, with the CFD results being within the standard deviations of the experimental results. While CFD radial velocity profiles between the impeller blades also compared well to the PIV velocity results, more work is still needed to address the large variability among both experimental and computational predictions of velocity in the diffuser outlet jet. Small differences were observed between the Newtonian and viscoelastic blood models in pressure head and hemolysis at the higher flow rate cases (FDA Conditions 4 and 5) but were more significant at lower flow rate and pump impeller speeds (FDA Condition 1). These results suggest that the importance of accounting for blood's viscoelasticity may be dependent on the specific blood pump operating conditions. This detailed computational framework with improved modeling techniques and an extensive validation procedure will be used in future CFD studies of centrifugal blood pumps to aid in device design and predictions of their biological responses.
© 2020 International Center for Artificial Organs and Transplantation and Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Food and Drug Administration; centrifugal blood pump; computational fluid dynamics; hemolysis; validation

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31971269      PMCID: PMC7308203          DOI: 10.1111/aor.13643

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Artif Organs        ISSN: 0160-564X            Impact factor:   3.094


  35 in total

1.  Numerical investigation of the effect of blade geometry on blood trauma in a centrifugal blood pump.

Authors:  W K Chan; Y W Wong; Y Ding; L P Chua; S C M Yu
Journal:  Artif Organs       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 3.094

2.  Computational fluid dynamics analysis of a maglev centrifugal left ventricular assist device.

Authors:  Greg W Burgreen; Howard M Loree; Kevin Bourque; Charles Dague; Victor L Poirier; David Farrar; Edward Hampton; Z Jon Wu; Thomas M Gempp; Reto Schöb
Journal:  Artif Organs       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.094

3.  Computational characterization of flow and hemolytic performance of the UltraMag blood pump for circulatory support.

Authors:  M Ertan Taskin; Katharine H Fraser; Tao Zhang; Barry Gellman; Andi Fleischli; Kurt A Dasse; Bartley P Griffith; Zhongjun J Wu
Journal:  Artif Organs       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.094

4.  A validated computational fluid dynamics model to estimate hemolysis in a rotary blood pump.

Authors:  Arash Arvand; Marcus Hormes; Helmut Reul
Journal:  Artif Organs       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.094

5.  Assessing Computational Model Credibility Using a Risk-Based Framework: Application to Hemolysis in Centrifugal Blood Pumps.

Authors:  Tina M Morrison; Prasanna Hariharan; Chloe M Funkhouser; Payman Afshari; Mark Goodin; Marc Horner
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2019 May/Jun       Impact factor: 2.872

6.  FDA Benchmark Medical Device Flow Models for CFD Validation.

Authors:  Richard A Malinauskas; Prasanna Hariharan; Steven W Day; Luke H Herbertson; Martin Buesen; Ulrich Steinseifer; Kenneth I Aycock; Bryan C Good; Steven Deutsch; Keefe B Manning; Brent A Craven
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2017 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 2.872

7.  Mesh sensitivity analysis for quantitative shear stress assessment in blood pumps using computational fluid dynamics.

Authors:  Sascha Heinrich Gross-Hardt; Fiete Boehning; Ulrich Steinseifer; Thomas Schmitz-Rode; Tim Kaufmann
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 2.097

8.  Computational fluid dynamics analysis of the pediatric tiny centrifugal blood pump (TinyPump).

Authors:  Kazuyuki Kido; Hideo Hoshi; Nobuo Watanabe; Hiroyuki Kataoka; Katsuhiro Ohuchi; Junichi Asama; Tadahiko Shinshi; Masaharu Yoshikawa; Setsuo Takatani
Journal:  Artif Organs       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.094

9.  Numerical Analysis of Blood Damage Potential of the HeartMate II and HeartWare HVAD Rotary Blood Pumps.

Authors:  Bente Thamsen; Bastian Blümel; Jens Schaller; Christian O Paschereit; Klaus Affeld; Leonid Goubergrits; Ulrich Kertzscher
Journal:  Artif Organs       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 3.094

10.  Hemolysis in different centrifugal pumps.

Authors:  K Kawahito; Y Nosé
Journal:  Artif Organs       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 3.094

View more
  2 in total

1.  Distribution and history of extensional stresses on vWF surrogate molecules in turbulent flow.

Authors:  Oanh L Pham; Samuel E Feher; Quoc T Nguyen; Dimitrios V Papavassiliou
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 4.996

2.  Computations of the shear stresses distribution experienced by passive particles as they circulate in turbulent flow: A case study for vWF protein molecules.

Authors:  Oanh L Pham; Samuel E Feher; Quoc T Nguyen; Dimitrios V Papavassiliou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-08-29       Impact factor: 3.752

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.