Literature DB >> 28114192

FDA Benchmark Medical Device Flow Models for CFD Validation.

Richard A Malinauskas1, Prasanna Hariharan, Steven W Day, Luke H Herbertson, Martin Buesen, Ulrich Steinseifer, Kenneth I Aycock, Bryan C Good, Steven Deutsch, Keefe B Manning, Brent A Craven.   

Abstract

Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) is increasingly being used to develop blood-contacting medical devices. However, the lack of standardized methods for validating CFD simulations and blood damage predictions limits its use in the safety evaluation of devices. Through a U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) initiative, two benchmark models of typical device flow geometries (nozzle and centrifugal blood pump) were tested in multiple laboratories to provide experimental velocities, pressures, and hemolysis data to support CFD validation. In addition, computational simulations were performed by more than 20 independent groups to assess current CFD techniques. The primary goal of this article is to summarize the FDA initiative and to report recent findings from the benchmark blood pump model study. Discrepancies between CFD predicted velocities and those measured using particle image velocimetry most often occurred in regions of flow separation (e.g., downstream of the nozzle throat, and in the pump exit diffuser). For the six pump test conditions, 57% of the CFD predictions of pressure head were within one standard deviation of the mean measured values. Notably, only 37% of all CFD submissions contained hemolysis predictions. This project aided in the development of an FDA Guidance Document on factors to consider when reporting computational studies in medical device regulatory submissions. There is an accompanying podcast available for this article. Please visit the journal's Web site (www.asaiojournal.com) to listen.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28114192     DOI: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000000499

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ASAIO J        ISSN: 1058-2916            Impact factor:   2.872


  14 in total

1.  Assessing Computational Model Credibility Using a Risk-Based Framework: Application to Hemolysis in Centrifugal Blood Pumps.

Authors:  Tina M Morrison; Prasanna Hariharan; Chloe M Funkhouser; Payman Afshari; Mark Goodin; Marc Horner
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2019 May/Jun       Impact factor: 2.872

Review 2.  Computational Fluid Dynamics Assessment Associated with Transcatheter Heart Valve Prostheses: A Position Paper of the ISO Working Group.

Authors:  Zhenglun Alan Wei; Simon Johannes Sonntag; Milan Toma; Shelly Singh-Gryzbon; Wei Sun
Journal:  Cardiovasc Eng Technol       Date:  2018-04-19       Impact factor: 2.495

Review 3.  Simulation of Mechanical Heart Valve Dysfunction and the Non-Newtonian Blood Model Approach.

Authors:  Aolin Chen; Adi Azriff Bin Basri; Norzian Bin Ismail; Masaaki Tamagawa; Di Zhu; Kamarul Arifin Ahmad
Journal:  Appl Bionics Biomech       Date:  2022-04-19       Impact factor: 1.664

4.  Computational modeling of the Food and Drug Administration's benchmark centrifugal blood pump.

Authors:  Bryan C Good; Keefe B Manning
Journal:  Artif Organs       Date:  2020-02-16       Impact factor: 3.094

5.  Dynamics of Blood Flows in Aortic Stenosis: Mild, Moderate, and Severe.

Authors:  Choon-Sik Jhun; Raymond Newswanger; Joshua P Cysyk; Sailahari Ponnaluri; Bryan Good; Keefe B Manning; Gerson Rosenberg
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 3.826

6.  Use of the FDA nozzle model to illustrate validation techniques in computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations.

Authors:  Prasanna Hariharan; Gavin A D'Souza; Marc Horner; Tina M Morrison; Richard A Malinauskas; Matthew R Myers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-08       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Validation of numerically simulated ventricular flow patterns during left ventricular assist device support.

Authors:  Mojgan Ghodrati; Thananya Khienwad; Alexander Maurer; Francesco Moscato; Francesco Zonta; Heinrich Schima; Philipp Aigner
Journal:  Int J Artif Organs       Date:  2020-02-05       Impact factor: 1.595

Review 8.  Application of Patient-Specific Computational Fluid Dynamics in Coronary and Intra-Cardiac Flow Simulations: Challenges and Opportunities.

Authors:  Liang Zhong; Jun-Mei Zhang; Boyang Su; Ru San Tan; John C Allen; Ghassan S Kassab
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 4.566

9.  Advancing Regulatory Science With Computational Modeling for Medical Devices at the FDA's Office of Science and Engineering Laboratories.

Authors:  Tina M Morrison; Pras Pathmanathan; Mariam Adwan; Edward Margerrison
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2018-09-25

10.  Patient-specific computational flow modelling for assessing hemodynamic changes following fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair.

Authors:  Kenneth Tran; Weiguang Yang; Alison Marsden; Jason T Lee
Journal:  JVS Vasc Sci       Date:  2021-03-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.