Literature DB >> 30458464

Mesh sensitivity analysis for quantitative shear stress assessment in blood pumps using computational fluid dynamics.

Sascha Heinrich Gross-Hardt1, Fiete Boehning1, Ulrich Steinseifer2, Thomas Schmitz-Rode3, Tim Kaufmann1.   

Abstract

The reduction of excessive, nonphysiologic shear stresses leading to blood trauma can be the key to overcome many of the associated complications in blood recirculating devices. In that regard, Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) are gaining in importance for the hydraulic and hemocompatibility assessment. Still, direct hemolysis assessments with CFD remain inaccurate and limited to qualitative comparisons rather than quantitative predictions. An underestimated quantity for improved blood damage prediction accuracy is the influence of near-wall mesh resolution on shear stress quantification in regions of complex flows. This study investigated the necessary mesh refinement to quantify shear stress for two selected, meshing sensitive hotspots within a rotary centrifugal blood pump. The non-dimensional mesh characteristic number y+, which is known in the context of turbulence modelling, underestimated the maximum wall shear stress by 60% on average with the recommended value of 1, but was found to be exact below 0.1. To evaluate the meshing related error on the numerical hemolysis prediction, three-dimensional simulations of a generic centrifugal pump were performed with mesh sizes from 3 to 30 million elements. The respective hemolysis was calculated using an Eulerian scalar transport model. Mesh insensitivity was found below a maximum y+ of 0.2 necessitating 18 million mesh elements. A meshing related error of up to 25% was found for the coarser meshes. Further investigations need to address: 1) the transferability to other geometries and 2) potential adaptions on blood damage estimation models to allow better quantitative predictions.

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID: 30458464     DOI: 10.1115/1.4042043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech Eng        ISSN: 0148-0731            Impact factor:   2.097


  3 in total

1.  Computational modeling of the Food and Drug Administration's benchmark centrifugal blood pump.

Authors:  Bryan C Good; Keefe B Manning
Journal:  Artif Organs       Date:  2020-02-16       Impact factor: 3.094

2.  Hemolysis at low blood flow rates: in-vitro and in-silico evaluation of a centrifugal blood pump.

Authors:  Malte Schöps; Sascha H Groß-Hardt; Thomas Schmitz-Rode; Ulrich Steinseifer; Daniel Brodie; Johanna C Clauser; Christian Karagiannidis
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 5.531

3.  Development of the Centrifugal Blood Pump for a Hybrid Continuous Flow Pediatric Total Artificial Heart: Model, Make, Measure.

Authors:  Carson S Fox; Thomas Palazzolo; Matthew Hirschhorn; Randy M Stevens; Joseph Rossano; Steven W Day; Vakhtang Tchantchaleishvili; Amy L Throckmorton
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-08-04
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.