Haibo Wang1, Christian Dienemann1, Alexandra Stützer2, Henning Urlaub2,3, Alan C M Cheung4,5, Patrick Cramer6. 1. Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, Department of Molecular Biology, Göttingen, Germany. 2. Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, Bioanalytical Mass Spectrometry, Göttingen, Germany. 3. University Medical Center Göttingen, Institute of Clinical Chemistry, Bioanalytics Group, Göttingen, Germany. 4. Department of Structural and Molecular Biology, Institute of Structural and Molecular Biology, University College London, London, UK. 5. Institute of Structural and Molecular Biology, Biological Sciences, Birkbeck College, London, UK. 6. Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, Department of Molecular Biology, Göttingen, Germany. pcramer@mpibpc.mpg.de.
Abstract
Gene transcription by RNA polymerase II is regulated by activator proteins that recruit the coactivator complexes SAGA (Spt-Ada-Gcn5-acetyltransferase)1,2 and transcription factor IID (TFIID)2-4. SAGA is required for all regulated transcription5 and is conserved among eukaryotes6. SAGA contains four modules7-9: the activator-binding Tra1 module, the core module, the histone acetyltransferase (HAT) module and the histone deubiquitination (DUB) module. Previous studies provided partial structures10-14, but the structure of the central core module is unknown. Here we present the cryo-electron microscopy structure of SAGA from the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae and resolve the core module at 3.3 Å resolution. The core module consists of subunits Taf5, Sgf73 and Spt20, and a histone octamer-like fold. The octamer-like fold comprises the heterodimers Taf6-Taf9, Taf10-Spt7 and Taf12-Ada1, and two histone-fold domains in Spt3. Spt3 and the adjacent subunit Spt8 interact with the TATA box-binding protein (TBP)2,7,15-17. The octamer-like fold and its TBP-interacting region are similar in TFIID, whereas Taf5 and the Taf6 HEAT domain adopt distinct conformations. Taf12 and Spt20 form flexible connections to the Tra1 module, whereas Sgf73 tethers the DUB module. Binding of a nucleosome to SAGA displaces the HAT and DUB modules from the core-module surface, allowing the DUB module to bind one face of an ubiquitinated nucleosome.
Gene transcription by RNA polymerase II is regulated by activator proteins that recruit the coactivator complexes SAGA (Spt-Ada-Gcn5-acetyltransferase)1,2 and transcription factor IID (TFIID)2-4. SAGA is required for all regulated transcription5 and is conserved among eukaryotes6. SAGA contains four modules7-9: the activator-binding Tra1 module, the core module, the histone acetyltransferase (HAT) module and the histone deubiquitination (DUB) module. Previous studies provided partial structures10-14, but the structure of the central core module is unknown. Here we present the cryo-electron microscopy structure of SAGA from the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae and resolve the core module at 3.3 Å resolution. The core module consists of subunits Taf5, Sgf73 and Spt20, and a histone octamer-like fold. The octamer-like fold comprises the heterodimers Taf6-Taf9, Taf10-Spt7 and Taf12-Ada1, and two histone-fold domains in Spt3. Spt3 and the adjacent subunit Spt8 interact with the TATA box-binding protein (TBP)2,7,15-17. The octamer-like fold and its TBP-interacting region are similar in TFIID, whereas Taf5 and the Taf6 HEAT domain adopt distinct conformations. Taf12 and Spt20 form flexible connections to the Tra1 module, whereas Sgf73 tethers the DUB module. Binding of a nucleosome to SAGA displaces the HAT and DUB modules from the core-module surface, allowing the DUB module to bind one face of an ubiquitinated nucleosome.
SAGA contains 19 subunits that are distributed over four modules[18]. The Tra1 module binds activators[19,20], the core module recruits TBP[21], the HAT module contains the histone H3 acetyltransferase Gcn5[1], and the DUB module comprises a histone H2B deubiquitinase[22,23]. To determine the structure of SAGA, we purified the endogenous complex from Saccharomyces cerevisiae using a strain with a C-terminal TAP-tag on subunit Spt20 (Methods). Purified SAGA contained all 19 subunits in apparently stoichiometric amounts (Extended Data Fig. 1a), and was subjected to cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) and protein crosslinking analysis (Methods). We obtained a reconstruction of SAGA at an overall resolution of 3.9 Å (Extended Data Figure 1; Supplementary Video 1).
Extended Data Figure 1
Cryo-EM structure determination and analysis of SAGA. Related to Fig. 1.
a. Purification of endogenous SAGA from S. cerevisiae. SDS-PAGE of peak fraction used for cryo-EM grid preparation. Identity of the bands was confirmed by mass spectrometry. For gel source data, see Supplementary Figure 1.
b. Exemplary cryo-EM micrograph of data collection. The micrograph is shown before (left) and after denoising (right) using Warp[35].
c. 2D class averages.
d. Sorting and classification tree used to reconstruct SAGA.
e. Fourier shell correlation (FSC) between half maps of the final reconstructions of the complete SAGA complex and the SAGA modules Tra1 and core. Resolutions for the gold-standard FSC 0.143 criterion are listed.
f. Angular distribution plot for all particles in the final reconstructions of the SAGA core (top) and Tra1 (bottom) modules. Color shading from blue to yellow correlates with the number of particles at a specific orientation as indicated.
The two large SAGA modules, the Tra1 and the core module, were resolved at 3.4 Å and 3.3 Å resolution, respectively (Extended Data Figures 1d-e, 2a). We fitted the Tra1 structure[13], built the core module and the protein regions connecting the two modules, and refined the structure in real space (Extended Data Tables 1, 2; Extended Data Figure 2b). The HAT and DUB modules were more flexible and showed resolutions of 9 Å and 12 Å, respectively. The structure of the DUB module[12] could be fitted, but density for the HAT module could not be interpreted (Supplementary Video 1). Our protein-protein crosslinking and published crosslinking information[7] confirmed our modelling and assigned subunit Spt8 to a remaining density located between the core and Tra1 modules (Supplementary Table 1; Extended Data Figure 2c, d).
Extended Data Figure 2
Quality of the SAGA structure. Related to Figs. 1 and 2.
a. SAGA reconstruction colored according to local resolution[43]. Model-Map FSC curves calculated between the refined atomic models and maps are shown below.
b. Electron density (grey transparent surface) for various SAGA regions as indicated.
c. Overview of the crosslinking data. Circular plot of high-confidence lysine-lysine inter-subunit (green) and intra-subunit (purple) crosslinks obtained by mass spectrometry for the SAGA complex. The mass spectrometry measurement was repeated twice independently with similar results. A total of 396 unique inter-subunit crosslinks and 514 intra-subunit crosslinks were obtained.
d. Validated crosslinks mapped onto the SAGA structure. Out of 396 unique inter-subunit crosslinks, 120 could be mapped onto the core module structure, and 109 located within the 30 Å distance limit for the BS3 crosslinker. Blue lines depict the crosslinks with crosslinked sites within the 30 Å distance permitted by BS3, whereas red lines depict crosslinks over than 30 Å distance.
Extended Data Table 1
Cryo-EM data collection, refinement and validation statistics
SAGA(EMD-10412)(PDB 6T9I)
SAGA Tra1 module(EMD-10413)(PDB 6T9J)
SAGA core module(EMD-10414)(PDB 6T9K)
SAGA DUB module-nucleosome(EMD-10415)(PDB 6T9L)
SAGA in nucleosome-bound state(EMD-10416)
Data collection and processing
Magnification
130,000
130,000
130,000
105,000
105,000
Voltage (kV)
300
300
300
300
300
Electron exposure (e–/Å2)
42.45
42.45
42.45
44.17
44.17
Defocus range (μm)
1.25 to 2.75
1.25 to 2.75
1.25 to 2.75
1.25 to 2.75
1.25 to 2.75
Pixel size (Å)
1.05
1.05
1.05
1.37
1.37
Symmetry imposed
C1
C1
C1
C1
C1
Initial particle images (no.)
250,368
250,368
250,368
579,759
579,759
Final particle images (no.)
27,602
27,602
27,602
113,856
86,910
Map resolution (Å)
3.9
3.4
3.3
3.7
6.1
FSC threshold
0.143
0.143
0.143
0.143
0.143
Map resolution range (Å)
3.2 – 8.1
3.0 – 5.8
3.1 – 8.0
3.2 – 7.3
--
Refinement
Initial models used (PDB code)
5OJS, 6MZD,6F3T, 2J49,4ATG, 1SS6
5OJS
6MZD, 6F3T,2J49, 4ATG,1SS6
4ZUX
Model resolution (Å)
3.3
3.2
3.3
3.6
FSC threshold
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
Model resolution range (Å)
2.6 – 3.2
2.7 – 3.2
2.8 – 3.4
3.4 – 3.8
Map sharpening B factor (Å2)
-137.1
-107.119
-90.9
-114.6
Model composition
Non-hydrogen atoms
48822
29551
19241
18157
Protein residues
6047
3617
2426
1532
Nucleotide
0
0
0
290
Ligands
0
0
0
8
B factor
Protein
58.5
66.3
46.6
20.6
Nucleic acid
-
-
-
13.6
Ligand
-
-
-
523.51
R.m.s. deviations
0.007
0.008
0.006
0.002
Bond lengths (Å)
1.295
1.353
1.211
0.455
Bond angles (°)
Validation
MolProbity score
1.84
1.79
1.78
1.39
Clashscore
6.70
5.51
5.85
7.11
Poor rotamers (%)
0.9
0.9
0.43
0.07
Ramachandran plot
Favored (%)
92.48
91.97
92.81
98.93
Allowed (%)
7.45
8.00
7.10
1.07
Disallowed (%)
0.07
0.03
0.08
0
Extended Data Table 2
Modelling of yeast SAGA subunits, domains and regions
The structure confirms the overall topology of SAGA with four flexibly connected modules[8,24], and reveals the intricate subunit architecture of the coactivator complex (Fig. 1). The SAGA structure contains only one copy of each subunit, in contrast to TFIID, which contains two copies of several subunits[3,4]. The SAGA core module occupies a central position and comprises the subunits Taf5, Taf6, Taf9, Taf10, Taf12, Spt3, Spt7, Spt20, and Ada1. The TBP-interacting subunit Spt8 is flexibly connected to the core module, as are the HAT and DUB modules (Fig. 1a). These three functional SAGA regions are lined up on one side of the complex that is predicted to face promoter DNA (Fig. 1a).
Figure 1
Overall structure of SAGA.
a. Overview of SAGA structure. Low-pass filtered and high-resolution composite cryo-EM maps of SAGA. The four SAGA modules Tra1, core, HAT and DUB are indicated.
b. High-resolution composite cryo-EM map reveals Tra1 and core modules. The subunit color code is used throughout.
c-d. Two views of the SAGA structure displayed as a ribbon model.
The core module contains a histone octamer-like fold and an adjacent submodule formed by subunits Taf5, Taf6 and Spt20 (Fig. 2). The octamer-like fold comprises three pairs of subunits that each contribute one histone fold (HF), namely Taf6-Taf9, Taf10-Spt7 and Taf12-Ada1, and by Spt3, which contributes two HFs. The presence of an octamer-like fold explains early observations of histone-like subunit pairs in SAGA[25,26]. In contrast to a canonical histone octamer, which shows two-fold symmetry, the SAGA octamer-like fold is fully asymmetric (Extended Data Fig. 3a).
b. Ribbon model showing subunit arrangement and interactions. View and color code as in Fig. 1.
c. The Taf5 WD40 propeller domain interacts with six other SAGA subunits.
Extended Data Figure 3
Comparison of histone-like fold in SAGA with the histone octamer, details of Taf5-Spt20 interactions, and model of SAGA-TBP complex. Related to Figs. 1, 2, and 3.
a. Comparison of the SAGA core module histone octamer-like structure with the canonical histone octamer core (PDB code 1AOI). The canonical octamer core is rendered as the color for the SAGA octamer-like fold.
b. Details of Taf5-Spt20 wedge interactions. Residues involved in the interactions are shown in sticks and colored as indicted.
c. Details of interactions between Taf5 LisH domain and Spt20 SEP domain. Residues involved in the interactions are shown in sticks and colored as indicted.
d. Model of the SAGA-TBP complex. The model was generated by superposing the TBP-containing TFIID lobe A onto the SAGA core structure. A homology model for Spt8 was generated by I-TASSER server[44].
Subunit Taf5 connects the octamer-like fold to the remainder of the core module and is thus important for core module architecture (Fig. 2b). The N-terminal helical domain of Taf5 binds the C-terminal HEAT repeat region of Taf6. The C-terminal WD40 β-propeller of Taf5 docks to the HF pairs Taf6-Taf9 and Taf10-Spt7, and binds Spt20, which contains a SEP (shp1-eyc-p47) domain (Fig. 2c). Spt20 also contains an extended loop that forms a wedge between the two Taf5 domains, thereby stabilizing them in a defined orientation (Fig. 2b, Extended Data Fig. 3b). The Lis1 homology motif (LisH) helices of Taf5 interact with the SEP domain of Spt20 (Extended Data Fig. 3c). Taf6 contributes one β-strand to the Taf5 propeller, suggesting that Taf5 and Taf6 form an obligate heterodimer (Fig. 2c). The Taf5 propeller and the Taf6 HEAT region both interact with a stretch of Spt7 that extends from the octamer-like fold and continues into a bromodomain that is mobile.SAGA has long been known to bind TBP[15-17,27], implying a role in recruiting TBP to promoters. According to crosslinking[7] and genetic data[2], SAGA interacts with TBP using its subunits Spt3 and Spt8. These two subunits occupy adjacent locations at the edge of the octamer-like fold (Fig. 1, Fig. 3a). SAGA and TFIID share the subunits Taf5, Taf6, Taf9, Taf10, and Taf12[18]. TFIID consists of three lobes that were called lobe A, B, and C and were structurally defined recently[3,4]. Lobe A contains an octamer-like fold that resembles the fold observed in SAGA. However, Spt7 and Ada1 are replaced by TFIID subunits Taf3 and Taf4, respectively, and the two HF domains of Spt3 are replaced by the HF pair Taf11-Taf13 in TFIID (Fig. 3b). Despite these differences, the octamer-like folds in SAGA and TFIID bind TBP at the same relative position (Fig. 3a, b).
Figure 3
Comparison of SAGA core module with TFIID.
a. SAGA core module with subunits that are shared with TFIID in color. A magenta dot depicts lysine residue K190 of Spt3 that was crosslinked to TBP[18] and is located in the loop between the two HFs of Spt3 (dashed magenta line).
b. Comparison with TBP-bound TFIID lobe A[3] shows that TBP binds to the same relative position with respect to the histone-like fold in SAGA and TFIID. The histone-like folds are similar but differ in their subunit composition.
c. Comparison with TFIID lobe B[3] reveals different structures of Taf5 and Taf6 that are due to complex-specific subunits.
We generated a model of the SAGA-TBP complex by superposing the TBP-containing TFIID structure lobe A onto the SAGA core structure (Extended Data Fig. 3d). The model is consistent with TBP bridging between SAGA subunits Spt3 and Spt8. In TFIID, the TFIID-specific subunit Taf1 also contributes to TBP binding, and this may explain an apparently higher affinity of TFIID for TBP compared to SAGA[2]. TFIID lobe B contains a hexamer of HF domains that lacks the Taf11-Taf13 pair and does not bind TBP, but otherwise resembles its counterpart in SAGA (Fig. 3c).Structural comparisons also show how SAGA and TFIID form distinct structures despite sharing five subunits (Fig. 3). The shared subunits Taf5 and Taf6 have different structures in the two complexes. In TFIID, the Taf5 N-terminal domain docks to the octamer-like fold and is stabilized by the TFIID-specific subunit Taf4. In SAGA, Taf4 is absent and subunit Ada1 occupies its position. The Taf5 N-terminal domain occupies a position that is distant from the octamer-like fold, is stabilized by the SAGA-specific subunit Spt20, and contacts the Taf6 HEAT repeat domain, which also adopts a different position and structure compared to TFIID. Thus, incorporation of Ada1 or Taf4 into the octamer-like fold may trigger assembly of either SAGA or TFIID, respectively.Our results also show that the core module forms flexible connections to the other modules of SAGA. The core subunits Taf12 and Spt20 contain Tra1-interacting regions (TIRs) that tether the Tra1 module. The Taf12 TIR (residues 353-410) meanders through a narrow surface groove formed by the TPR repeats of the FAT domain in Tra1, whereas Spt20 contains two TIRs (Extended Data Figure 4a, b, d). TIR1 (residues 398-416) forms a latch that retains the Taf12 TIR, and TIR2 (residue 474-488) forms a helix that binds Tra1 (Extended Data Figure 4a, b, d). These interactions are consistent with the known dissociation of Tra1 upon Spt20 deletion[28]. Further, subunit Sgf73 connects the core to the DUB module (Extended data Figure 4c, d). Whereas the central Sgf73 residues 353-437 are part of the core module (‘anchor helices’) and form interactions with Spt20, Ada1 Taf12, Taf6 and Taf9, the ~100 N-terminal residues are part of the DUB module[10-12]. Consistent with this, a Sgf73 region overlapping with the anchor helices is required to retain Sgf73 in SAGA[7,29].
Extended Data Figure 4
Details of inter-module interactions. Related to Figs. 1, 2.
a. Binding interface between core and Tra1 modules. The Tra1 FAT domain (grey) is shown as a surface representation. The Tra1-interacting regions (TIRs) of Taf12 (green) and Spt20 (yellow) are shown in cartoon representation.
b. Details of the interactions depicted in panel a.
c. Sgf73 (turquoise) tethers the DUB module to the core module. Residues involved in the interactions are shown in sticks and colored as indicted.
d. Sequence alignment of SAGA subunit regions involved in inter-module interactions. Conserved residues are highlighted in blue. Key residues are labeled with asterisks[45]. Sc, Pp and Sp stand for Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Pichia Pastoris, and Schizosaccharomyces pombe, respectively.
We next investigated how SAGA binds its nucleosome substrate. Modelling a nucleosome onto the DUB module with the use of the DUB-nucleosome structure[12] resulted in a clash of the nucleosome with the core module. Therefore, SAGA needs to change conformation to bind the nucleosome. To investigate this, we prepared nucleosomes that were ubiquitinated at histone H2B residue K120 (corresponding to K123 of yeast H2B) and trimethylated at histone H3 residue K4 (Methods). We then formed a SAGA-nucleosome complex, and subjected this to cryo-EM analysis (Extended Data Figure 5).
Extended Data Figure 5
Cryo-EM structure determination and analysis of the SAGA-nucleosome complex. Related to Fig. 4.
a. Exemplary cryo-EM micrograph of data collection. The micrograph is shown before (left) and after denoising (right) using Warp[35].
b. 2D class averages for the SAGA-nucleosome complex.
c. 2D class averages for the DUB module-nucleosome subcomplex.
d. Sorting and classification tree used to reconstruct the DUB module-nucleosome complex at 3.7 Å resolution.
e. Fourier shell correlation (FSC) between half maps of the final reconstructions of the SAGA module Tra1 and the DUB module-nucleosome complex from SAGA-nucleosome complex data. Resolutions for the gold-standard FSC 0.143 criterion are listed.
f. Angular distribution plot for all particles in the final reconstruction of the SAGA DUB module-nucleosome complex. Color shading from blue to yellow correlates with the number of particles at a specific orientation as indicated.
g. Superposition of crystal structure of DUB-ubiquitinated nucleosome (4ZUX)[12] onto the cryo-EM structure presented here. Structures are shown in cartoon and colored as indicated.
h. Comparison of the low-pass filtered overall cryo-EM maps of SAGA and the SAGA-nucleosome complex. Densities for HAT and DUB modules are lost upon nucleosome binding to SAGA.
The cryo-EM data revealed the DUB module bound to the modified nucleosome at 3.7 Å resolution (Fig. 4a, Extended Data Figure 5d-f). The obtained structure of the DUB module is virtually identical to the known structure of the isolated DUB module[10,11]. The DUB module binds to one face of the nucleosome in a way that is identical to that observed in the isolated DUB-nucleosome complex, although DUB modules bound to both faces of the nucleosome in this structure (Extended Data Figure 5g)[12]. Further data processing resolved the Tra1 module at 4.2 Å resolution, whereas the core module showed low resolution, and the HAT module was invisible, suggesting it became flexible upon nucleosome binding (Extended Data Figure 4d).
Figure 4
Nucleosome binding induces changes in SAGA.
a. Structure of DUB-nucleosome complex within SAGA.
b. Model showing changes in SAGA module orientation upon nucleosome and promoter binding.
Comparison of low-pass filtered maps shows that nucleosome binding displaces the HAT and DUB modules from the SAGA core module (Extended Data Fig. 5h). This is likely important for SAGA to fulfil its different functions during transcription activation when it is recruited by an activator to the promoter (Fig. 4b). Whereas the HAT and DUB modules would deubiquitinate and acetylate a promoter-bound nucleosome around or downstream of the transcription start site (TSS), the core module and Spt8 recruit TBP to the promoter upstream of the TSS. Flexibility between the modules would allow SAGA to bridge between promoter regions and to accommodate changes in their distance at different promoters.Finally, our results have implications for understanding the structure and function of related coactivators. The yeast complex SLIK is identical to SAGA but contains a C-terminally truncated version of Spt7 and lacks Spt8[30,31]. In our SAGA structure, the Spt7 C-terminal region protrudes towards Spt8, suggesting it contacts Spt8 and explaining why SLIK lacks Spt8. SAGA is highly conserved in human cells and contains counterparts of all yeast SAGA subunits except Spt8[18] (Extended Data Table 3). Thus, our yeast SAGA structure is a very good model for yeast SLIK and human SAGA. In conclusion, the structure of SAGA integrates available data, reveals differences to TFIID, and provides a framework for studying the mechanisms used by this multifunctional coactivator to regulate transcription.
Extended Data Table 3
SAGA Conservation between yeast and human
* The HHpred similarity scores are calculated between homologous regions only.
S.c. SAGASubunits
H.s. SAGASubunits
HHpred similarity*
HAT module
Ada2
TADA2B
0.569
Ada3
TADA3
0.278
Gcn5
GCN5/PCAF
0.851/0.864
Sgf29
SGF29
0.249
DUB module
Sgf11
ATXN7L3
0.356
Sgf73
ATXN7
0.205
Sus1
ENY2
0.518
Ubp8
USP22
0.576
Core module
Taf5
TAF5L
0.578
Taf6
TAF6L
0.344
Taf9
TAF9
0.657
Taf10
TAF10
0.688
Taf12
TAF12
0.677
Ada1
TADA1
0.190
Spt3
SUPT3H
0.378
Spt7
SUPT7L
0.167
Spt8
--
Spt20
SUPT20H
0.295
Tral
Tral
TRRAP
0.464
Methods
Purification of endogenous SAGA
Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain CB010 (MATa pep4::HIS3, prb1::LEU2, prc1::HISG, can1, ade2, trp1, ura3, his3, leu2-3,112) with a C-terminal TAP tag at Spt20 was grown in a 200 L fermenter (INFORS-HT) with 100 L YPD medium overnight and harvested at OD600=~5. Cell pellets were resuspended in lysis buffer (30 mM HEPES pH 7.5, 300 mM NaCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.05% NP40, 1 mM DTT, 0.284 μg/ml leupeptin, 1.37 μg/ml pepstatin A, 0.17 mg/ml PMSF, 0.33 mg/ml benzamidine) and frozen in liquid nitrogen. Frozen yeast cell beads were milled to powder using a cryogenic grinder (Spex sample prep 6875D). The lysed yeast powder was thawed and mixed with half the volume of lysis buffer. Lysates were cleared by centrifugation (4,000 g, 4 °C, 20 min and 235,000 g, 4°C, 60 min). The purification was performed as described[28], with several modifications. Briefly, the supernatant was incubated with IgG Sepharose-6 Fast Flow resin (GE Healthcare) at 4 °C for 3 h, the resin was washed with 5 column volumes (CV) of lysis buffer followed by 5 CV of TEV cleavage buffer (30 mM HEPES pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.05% NP40, 1 mM DTT, 0.5 mM EDTA) and then resuspended in 5 ml of the TEV cleavage buffer. TEV cleavage was performed by incubating with His6-TEV protease for 16 h at 4°C. The eluate was loaded onto a 1mL HiTrap Q column (GE Healthcare) and eluted with a gradient using as high salt buffer 30 mM HEPES pH 7.5, 1 M NaCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM DTT. Peak fractions were concentrated to ~1 mg ml-1.
Preparation of modified nucleosomes
To generate the K120-ubiquitinylated histone H2B, we introduced a lysine-to-cysteine mutation (K120C) into the Xenopus H2B sequence and a glycine-to-cysteine mutation (G76C) to ubiquitin by site-directed mutagenesis. The dichloroacetone (DCA) cross-link was formed between ubiquitin and H2B-K120 as described[12], with minor changes. Briefly, 100 μM H2B-K120C and 100 μM 6xHis-Ub-G76C proteins were incubated at 50°C in reaction buffer (50 mM borate pH 8.1, 1 mM tris(2-carboxyethyl) phosphine (TCEP)) for 1 hour to reduce cysteines, and were then cooled on ice for 1 hour. Dimethyl formamide (DMF) dissolved in dichloroacetone was added to the solution to a final concentration of 100 μM and incubated on ice for 1 hour. The reaction was quenched with 50 mM β-mercaptoethanol, frozen, and lyophilized. The resulting product mixture was resuspended in Ni-U buffer (20 mM HEPES pH 7.5, 500 mM NaCl, 6 M Urea, 2 mM β-mercaptoethanol, 20 mM imidazole) and applied to a HisTrap HP 5 ml column (GE Healthcare). The bound proteins were eluted with Ni buffer supplemented with 150 mM imidazole, and dialyzed into TEV cleavage buffer. After TEV cleavage for 16 hours at 4°C, the product was dialyzed into Ni-U buffer and reapplied to a HisTrap HP 5 ml column to remove uncleaved products. The flow-through from the column was applied to a HiTrap SP 5 ml column (GE Healthcare) and eluted with a gradient of Ni-U buffer with 1M NaCl. Peak fractions were pooled and dialyzed to water containing 5 mM β-mercaptoethanol, frozen and lyophilized.H3K4me3 binding by the Sgf29 Tudor domain is required for chromatin targeting and histone H3 acetylation of SAGA[32]. To generate the K4-trimethylated histone H3 variant, a single lysine-to-cysteine mutation (K4C) was introduced into the H3 sequence by site-directed mutagenesis. Cysteine-engineered histone H3 K4C protein was alkylated as described[33]. Briefly, purified protein was reduced with DTT before addition of a 50-fold molar excess of trimethylammonium bromide (Sigma 117196–25G). The reaction mixture was incubated for 4 h at 50 °C before quenching with 5 mM β-mercaptoethanol. The modified protein was desalted using a PD-10 desalting column (GE Healthcare) pre-equilibrated in water supplemented with 2 mM β-mercaptoethanol and lyophilized. Successful alkylation was confirmed by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. The Widom 601 145 bp DNA was purified as described from the pUC19 8 × 145 bp 601-sequence plasmid using the restriction enzyme EcoRV to digest the DNA into fragments[34]. Nucleosomes were reconstituted with modified histones and the Widom 601 DNA as described[34].
Cryo-EM sample preparation
Purified SAGA (or SAGA mixed with the modified nucleosome at a molar ratio of 1:2) was incubated with 3 mM BS3 for 1 hour on ice, quenched for 10 min using 10 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 2 mM lysine and 8 mM aspartate. Quenched samples were applied to a 15-40% sucrose gradient in dialysis buffer (20 mM HEPES pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM TCEP, 2% glycerol), and ultracentrifuge at 32,000 rpm (SW60 rotor) for 16 h at 4 °C. Gradients were fractionated in 200 μl and analysed with native PAGE. The gels were stained with Syber Gold (Invitrogen) and Coomassie brilliant blue. Peak fractions containing SAGA or the SAGA-nucleosome complex were dialysed overnight, concentrated to ~0.2 mg ml-1, and used for grid preparation. 2 μL of sample was applied to glow-discharged UltrAuFoil 2/2 grids (Quantifoil, Jena, Germany) on each side of the grid. After incubation for 10 seconds, the sample was blotted for 4 seconds and vitrified by plunging into liquid ethane using a Vitrobot Mark IV (FEI Company) operated at 4 °C and 100 % humidity.
Cryo-EM data collection and image processing
Cryo-EM data of the SAGA and SAGA-NCP were acquired on a FEI Titan Krios transmission electron microscope operated at 300 keV, equipped with a K2 summit direct detector and a GIF quantum energy filter (Gatan, Pleasanton, CA, United States). Automated data acquisition was carried out using EPU software (FEI) at a nominal magnification of 130,000× or 105,000×, resulting in calibrated pixel sizes of -1.05 Å and -1.35 Å for SAGA and the SAGA-nucleosome complex, respectively. Movies of 40 frames were collected in counting mode over 9 seconds with a defocus range from 1.25-2.75 μm. The dose rate was 4.7 e- per Å2 per second resulting in 1.06 e- per Å2 per frame for SAGA, and 4.9 e- per Å2 per second resulting in 1.10 e- per Å2 per frame for the SAGA-nucleosome complex, respectively. A total of 4697 and 4866 movies were collected for SAGA and the SAGA-nucleosome complex, respectively. Movie stacks were motion-corrected, CTF-estimated, and dose-weighted using Warp[35].Particles of the SAGA data were auto-picked by Warp, yielding 250,368 particle images. Image processing was performed with RELION 3.0.5[36]. Particles were extracted using a box size of 4002 pixels, and normalized. Reference-free 2D classification was performed to screen for good particles in the dataset. An ab initio model generated from cryoSPARC[37] was used as an initial reference for subsequent 3D classification. All classes containing intact SAGA density were combined (107,759 particles) and used for a global 3D refinement resulting in a map at 4.7 Å resolution. To improve the map for the core module of SAGA, focused 3D classification without image alignment was performed employing a mask around the core module. The class that showed the best density for the core module was subjected to another round of 3D refinement resulting in an overall resolution of 4.1 Å. Focused refinement further improved the resolution to 3.4 Å and 3.3 Å for the Tra1 and the core module, respectively. Post-processing of refined reconstructions was performed using automatic B-factor determination in RELION and reported resolutions are based on the gold-standard Fourier shell correlation 0.143 criterion (B-factors of -107 Å2 and -91 Å2 for the Tra1 and the core module, respectively). Local resolution estimates were obtained using the built-in local resolution estimation tool of RELION using the estimated B-factors.For the SAGA-nucleosome complex sample, 579,759 particles were auto-picked by Warp. Since the DUB-nucleosome and the remaining parts of SAGA were not present together during the classification steps, particles of SAGA in nucleosome-bound state and the DUB-nucleosome were processed separately. Otherwise, the processing procedure was the same as that for SAGA. However, focused 3D classification without alignment did not yield good core module particles from the SAGA-nucleosome dataset. A reconstruction at 6.1 Å overall resolution was obtained from 86,910 particles of SAGA in the nucleosome-bound state. Focused refinement further improved the resolution to 4.2 Å for the Tra1 lobe. For the DUB-nucleosome complex, a reconstruction at 3.7 Å overall resolution was obtained from 113,856 particles. Post-processing of the refined reconstructions was performed using automated B-factor determination in RELION and reported resolutions are based on the gold-standard Fourier shell correlation 0.143 criterion (B-factors of -149 Å2 and -115 Å2 for the Tra1 lobe and the DUB-nucleosome, respectively). Local resolution estimates were obtained using the built-in local resolution estimation tool of RELION using the previously estimated B-factors.
Crosslinking and mass spectrometry
Samples for crosslinking mass spectrometry were performed essentially in the same way as those for cryo-EM. Cross-linked samples were purified by sucrose gradient centrifugation and fractions containing fully assembled complexes were pooled for MS sample preparation. For in-solution digest, urea buffer (8 M urea, 50 mM NH4HCO3 pH 8) was added to pooled fractions to a final concentration of 1 M urea. Samples were reduced with 5 mM DTT (in 50 mM NH4HCO3 pH 8) for 30 min at 37°C, 300 rpm followed by alkylation with 20 mM iodoacetamide (in 50 mM NH4HCO3 pH 8) for 30 min at 37°C, 300 rpm, in the dark. The reaction was quenched by addition of 5 mM DTT (in 50 mM NH4HCO3 pH 8). Trypsin digest (Promega, V5111) was performed overnight at 37°C with 1:20 mass ratio (trypsin-complex). Tryptic peptides were desalted using C18 spin columns (Harvard Apparatus 74-4601), lyophilized and dissolved in 30 % [v/v] acetonitrile, 0.1 % [v/v] trifluoroacetic acid. The peptide mixture was separated on a Superdex Peptide 3.2/300 (GE Healthcare) column run at 50 μl/min with 30 % [v/v] acetonitrile, 0.1 % [v/v] trifluoroacetic acid. Cross-linked species are enriched by size exclusion chromatography based on their higher molecular weight compared to linear peptides. Therefore, 50 μl fractions were collected from 1.0 ml post-injection. Fractions from 1.0-1.6 ml post-injection were dried in a speed-vac and dissolved in 5 % [v/v] acetonitrile, 0.05 % [v/v] trifluoroacetic acid and subjected to LC-MS/MS.LC-MS/MS analyses were performed on a Q Exactive HF-X hybrid quadrupole-orbitrap mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific) coupled to a Dionex Ultimate 3000 RSLCnano system. Peptides were loaded on a Pepmap 300 C18 column (Thermo Fisher) at a flow rate of 10 μl/min in buffer A (0.1 % [v/v] formic acid) and washed for 3 min with buffer A. The sample was separated on an in-house packed C18 column (30 cm; ReproSil-Pur 120 Å, 1.9 μm, C18-AQ; inner diameter, 75 μm) at a flow rate of 300 nl/min. Sample separation was performed over 60 min (in-solution digest) or 120 min (in-gel digest) using a buffer system consisting of 0.1 % [v/v] formic acid (buffer A) and 80 % [v/v] acetonitrile, 0.08 % [v/v] formic acid (buffer B). The main column was equilibrated with 5 % B, followed by sample application and a wash with 5 % B. Peptides were eluted by a linear gradient from 15-48 % B or 20-50 % B. The gradient was followed by a wash step at 95 % B and re-equilibration at 5 % B. Eluting peptides were analyzed in positive mode using a data-dependent top 30-acquisition methods. MS1 and MS2 resolution were set to 120,000 and 30,000 FWHM, respectively. Precursors selected for MS2 were fragmented using 30 % normalized, higher-energy collision-induced dissociation (HCD) fragmentation. Allowed charge states of selected precursors were +3 to +7. Further MS/MS parameters were set as follows: isolation width, 1.4 m/z; dynamic exclusion, 10 sec; max. injection time (MS1/MS2), 60 ms/200 ms. The lock mass option (m/z 445.12002) was used for internal calibration. All measurements were performed in duplicates. The .raw files of all replicates were searched by the software pLink 1, version 2.3.1[38] and pLink 2[39] against a customized protein database containing the expressed proteins. Protein-protein crosslinks were filtered with 1 % FDR and plotted using xVis[40].
Model building
The structure of the core module was built by first placing the known structure of the Taf5-Taf6-Taf9 trimer (PDB ID: 6F3T) into the density by rigid-body fitting in Chimera. Adjustments were made to the protein sequence in Coot[41]; insertions and deletions were manually built according to the density. The HF domains of Taf10, Spt7, Taf12, Ada1 and Spt3 and extensions from them were manually built. The structure of Taf5 NTD (PDB ID: 2J49) and Taf6 HEAT domain (PDB ID: 4ATG) were placed into the density and adjusted in Coot. The remaining parts were built manually. Secondary structure predictions from PSIPRED was used to assist de novo modelling. Alpha helices were generated using Coot and manually fitted into the density. Linkers between the helices were modelled where clear density was visible. Crosslinking restraints and densities from bulky residues such as Lys, Arg, Phe, Tyr and Trp were used to guide modeling. The SEP domain of Spt20 shares structural homology with human p47 (PDB: 1SS6), and this structure guided Spt20 modeling. The structure of the Tra1 module was built by placing the structure of Tra1(PDB ID: 5OJS) into the density by rigid-body fitting in Chimera, the TIR of Taf12 and Spt20 were manually built in Coot based on the density and crosslinking restraints. The DUB-nucleosome structure (PDB ID: 4ZUX) was placed into the corresponding densities by rigid-body fitting the DUB module and nucleosome in Chimera. All models were subjected to alternating manual adjustment and real-space refinement using Coot and PHENIX[42], resulting in good stereochemistry as assessed by Molprobity[43]. Figures were generated in PyMOL (Schrödinger LLC, version 2.2.2) and UCSF Chimera (version 1.13).
Cryo-EM structure determination and analysis of SAGA. Related to Fig. 1.
a. Purification of endogenous SAGA from S. cerevisiae. SDS-PAGE of peak fraction used for cryo-EM grid preparation. Identity of the bands was confirmed by mass spectrometry. For gel source data, see Supplementary Figure 1.b. Exemplary cryo-EM micrograph of data collection. The micrograph is shown before (left) and after denoising (right) using Warp[35].c. 2D class averages.d. Sorting and classification tree used to reconstruct SAGA.e. Fourier shell correlation (FSC) between half maps of the final reconstructions of the complete SAGA complex and the SAGA modules Tra1 and core. Resolutions for the gold-standard FSC 0.143 criterion are listed.f. Angular distribution plot for all particles in the final reconstructions of the SAGA core (top) and Tra1 (bottom) modules. Color shading from blue to yellow correlates with the number of particles at a specific orientation as indicated.
Quality of the SAGA structure. Related to Figs. 1 and 2.
a. SAGA reconstruction colored according to local resolution[43]. Model-Map FSC curves calculated between the refined atomic models and maps are shown below.b. Electron density (grey transparent surface) for various SAGA regions as indicated.c. Overview of the crosslinking data. Circular plot of high-confidence lysine-lysine inter-subunit (green) and intra-subunit (purple) crosslinks obtained by mass spectrometry for the SAGA complex. The mass spectrometry measurement was repeated twice independently with similar results. A total of 396 unique inter-subunit crosslinks and 514 intra-subunit crosslinks were obtained.d. Validated crosslinks mapped onto the SAGA structure. Out of 396 unique inter-subunit crosslinks, 120 could be mapped onto the core module structure, and 109 located within the 30 Å distance limit for the BS3 crosslinker. Blue lines depict the crosslinks with crosslinked sites within the 30 Å distance permitted by BS3, whereas red lines depict crosslinks over than 30 Å distance.
Comparison of histone-like fold in SAGA with the histone octamer, details of Taf5-Spt20 interactions, and model of SAGA-TBP complex. Related to Figs. 1, 2, and 3.
a. Comparison of the SAGA core module histone octamer-like structure with the canonical histone octamer core (PDB code 1AOI). The canonical octamer core is rendered as the color for the SAGA octamer-like fold.b. Details of Taf5-Spt20 wedge interactions. Residues involved in the interactions are shown in sticks and colored as indicted.c. Details of interactions between Taf5 LisH domain and Spt20 SEP domain. Residues involved in the interactions are shown in sticks and colored as indicted.d. Model of the SAGA-TBP complex. The model was generated by superposing the TBP-containing TFIID lobe A onto the SAGA core structure. A homology model for Spt8 was generated by I-TASSER server[44].
Details of inter-module interactions. Related to Figs. 1, 2.
a. Binding interface between core and Tra1 modules. The Tra1 FAT domain (grey) is shown as a surface representation. The Tra1-interacting regions (TIRs) of Taf12 (green) and Spt20 (yellow) are shown in cartoon representation.b. Details of the interactions depicted in panel a.c. Sgf73 (turquoise) tethers the DUB module to the core module. Residues involved in the interactions are shown in sticks and colored as indicted.d. Sequence alignment of SAGA subunit regions involved in inter-module interactions. Conserved residues are highlighted in blue. Key residues are labeled with asterisks[45]. Sc, Pp and Sp stand for Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Pichia Pastoris, and Schizosaccharomyces pombe, respectively.
Cryo-EM structure determination and analysis of the SAGA-nucleosome complex. Related to Fig. 4.
a. Exemplary cryo-EM micrograph of data collection. The micrograph is shown before (left) and after denoising (right) using Warp[35].b. 2D class averages for the SAGA-nucleosome complex.c. 2D class averages for the DUB module-nucleosome subcomplex.d. Sorting and classification tree used to reconstruct the DUB module-nucleosome complex at 3.7 Å resolution.e. Fourier shell correlation (FSC) between half maps of the final reconstructions of the SAGA module Tra1 and the DUB module-nucleosome complex from SAGA-nucleosome complex data. Resolutions for the gold-standard FSC 0.143 criterion are listed.f. Angular distribution plot for all particles in the final reconstruction of the SAGA DUB module-nucleosome complex. Color shading from blue to yellow correlates with the number of particles at a specific orientation as indicated.g. Superposition of crystal structure of DUB-ubiquitinated nucleosome (4ZUX)[12] onto the cryo-EM structure presented here. Structures are shown in cartoon and colored as indicated.h. Comparison of the low-pass filtered overall cryo-EM maps of SAGA and the SAGA-nucleosome complex. Densities for HAT and DUB modules are lost upon nucleosome binding to SAGA.
SAGA Conservation between yeast and human
* The HHpred similarity scores are calculated between homologous regions only.
Authors: P A Grant; L Duggan; J Côté; S M Roberts; J E Brownell; R Candau; R Ohba; T Owen-Hughes; C D Allis; F Winston; S L Berger; J L Workman Journal: Genes Dev Date: 1997-07-01 Impact factor: 11.361
Authors: Tiago Baptista; Sebastian Grünberg; Nadège Minoungou; Maria J E Koster; H T Marc Timmers; Steve Hahn; Didier Devys; László Tora Journal: Mol Cell Date: 2018-06-21 Impact factor: 17.970
Authors: Grigory Sharov; Karine Voltz; Alexandre Durand; Olga Kolesnikova; Gabor Papai; Alexander G Myasnikov; Annick Dejaegere; Adam Ben Shem; Patrick Schultz Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2017-11-16 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Olga Kolesnikova; Adam Ben-Shem; Jie Luo; Jeff Ranish; Patrick Schultz; Gabor Papai Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2018-11-07 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Avinash B Patel; Robert K Louder; Basil J Greber; Sebastian Grünberg; Jie Luo; Jie Fang; Yutong Liu; Jeff Ranish; Steve Hahn; Eva Nogales Journal: Science Date: 2018-11-15 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Julie M Garlick; Steven M Sturlis; Paul A Bruno; Joel A Yates; Amanda L Peiffer; Yejun Liu; Laura Goo; LiWei Bao; Samantha N De Salle; Giselle Tamayo-Castillo; Charles L Brooks; Sofia D Merajver; Anna K Mapp Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2021-06-17 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Vignesh Kasinath; Curtis Beck; Paul Sauer; Simon Poepsel; Jennifer Kosmatka; Marco Faini; Daniel Toso; Ruedi Aebersold; Eva Nogales Journal: Science Date: 2021-01-22 Impact factor: 47.728
Extended Data Figure 1
Extended Data Figure 2
Figure 1
Figure 2
Extended Data Figure 3
Figure 3
Extended Data Figure 4
Extended Data Figure 5
Figure 4