Literature DB >> 17427129

Scaling of nectar foraging in orchid bees.

Brendan J Borrell1.   

Abstract

Morphology influences the rate at which foraging bees visit nectar flowers, the quantity of nectar they must consume to fuel their activities, and, consequently, the profitability of flower species. Because feeding time is a major determinant of visitation rate, I used a biomechanical model to examine how energy intake rate (E) varies with sucrose concentration, body mass (M), and proboscis length in orchid bees (Apidae: Euglossini). Under geometric scaling, the optimal sugar concentration (Smax) should be largely independent of body size, and E proportional to M1.0. In a comparative study of 30 orchid bee species ranging from 50 to 800 mg, Smax fell between 35% and 40% w/w, but E proportional to M0.54, significantly less than model predictions. Proboscis length and radius scale geometrically with body mass, but proboscis length exhibits substantial size-independent variation, particularly in small bees. One cost of a long proboscis is a reduction in both E and Smax in accordance with the scaling model. This finding highlights a difference between the lapping mechanism used by bumblebees and the suction mechanism used by orchid bees. A field study confirms that orchid bees harvest nectars with between 34% and 42% sucrose, independent of body size.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17427129     DOI: 10.1086/512689

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Nat        ISSN: 0003-0147            Impact factor:   3.926


  11 in total

1.  Nectar intake rate is modulated by changes in sucking pump activity according to colony starvation in carpenter ants.

Authors:  Agustina Falibene; Roxana Josens
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2008-03-05       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  The ecological basis for biogeographic classification: an example in orchid bees (Apidae: Euglossini).

Authors:  A Parra-H; G Nates-Parra
Journal:  Neotrop Entomol       Date:  2012-08-24       Impact factor: 1.434

3.  Variation of foraging rate and wing loading, but not resting metabolic rate scaling, of insect pollinators.

Authors:  John S Terblanche; Bruce Anderson
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2010-07-10

4.  The mechanics of nectar offloading in the bumblebee Bombus terrestris and implications for optimal concentrations during nectar foraging.

Authors:  Jonathan G Pattrick; Hamish A Symington; Walter Federle; Beverley J Glover
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 4.118

5.  Large-range movements of neotropical orchid bees observed via radio telemetry.

Authors:  Martin Wikelski; Jerry Moxley; Alexander Eaton-Mordas; Margarita M López-Uribe; Richard Holland; David Moskowitz; David W Roubik; Roland Kays
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Predictable patterns of trait mismatches between interacting plants and insects.

Authors:  Bruce Anderson; John S Terblanche; Allan G Ellis
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 3.260

7.  Functional constraints on the evolution of long butterfly proboscides: lessons from Neotropical skippers (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae).

Authors:  J A S Bauder; L Morawetz; A D Warren; H W Krenn
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 2.411

8.  Raising the sugar content--orchid bees overcome the constraints of suction feeding through manipulation of nectar and pollen provisions.

Authors:  Tamara Pokorny; Klaus Lunau; Thomas Eltz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The Allometry of Bee Proboscis Length and Its Uses in Ecology.

Authors:  Daniel P Cariveau; Geetha K Nayak; Ignasi Bartomeus; Joseph Zientek; John S Ascher; Jason Gibbs; Rachael Winfree
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-17       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Controlling the impact of the managed honeybee on wild bees in protected areas.

Authors:  Mickaël Henry; Guy Rodet
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.