Literature DB >> 17142679

Mechanics of nectar feeding in the orchid bee Euglossa imperialis: pressure, viscosity and flow.

Brendan J Borrell1.   

Abstract

The orchid bee Euglossa imperialis sucks nectars through a slender proboscis. I tested how nectar properties influence this suction pressure and whether ambient air pressure sets the upper limit for suction feeding. Nectar intake rate was measured as a function of sucrose concentration (5-75% w/w), nectar viscosity (2-80 mPa s), and ambient pressure (101-40 kPa). Intake rate declines from about 1.2 mul s(-1) to 0.003 mul s(-1) as sucrose concentration increases from 15% to 65% sucrose. When sucrose concentration is held at 25% while viscosity increases from 2 to 80 mPa s, intake rate declines. When viscosity is held at 10.2 mPa s (the viscosity of 50% sucrose) while sucrose concentration increases from 5% to 50%, intake rate remains constant. Intake rate was limited by a reduction in ambient pressure at all nectar concentrations. Assuming a rigid proboscis, the Hagen-Poiseuille equation suggests that suction pressure increases with viscosity from 10 kPa at 5% sucrose to 45 kPa at 65% sucrose. However, because intake rate declined by the same fraction under hypobaria (40 kPa) at all sucrose concentrations, the euglossine bee proboscis may be better described as a collapsible tube: expanding or collapsing depending on the flow rate, the pressure gradient along the proboscis, and circumferential forces imposed by the proboscis walls.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17142679     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.02593

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  10 in total

1.  Optimal concentrations in nectar feeding.

Authors:  Wonjung Kim; Tristan Gilet; John W M Bush
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-09-26       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Nectar intake rate is modulated by changes in sucking pump activity according to colony starvation in carpenter ants.

Authors:  Agustina Falibene; Roxana Josens
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2008-03-05       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  The ecological basis for biogeographic classification: an example in orchid bees (Apidae: Euglossini).

Authors:  A Parra-H; G Nates-Parra
Journal:  Neotrop Entomol       Date:  2012-08-24       Impact factor: 1.434

4.  The mechanics of nectar offloading in the bumblebee Bombus terrestris and implications for optimal concentrations during nectar foraging.

Authors:  Jonathan G Pattrick; Hamish A Symington; Walter Federle; Beverley J Glover
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 4.118

5.  Honeybees prefer warmer nectar and less viscous nectar, regardless of sugar concentration.

Authors:  Susan W Nicolson; Leo de Veer; Angela Köhler; Christian W W Pirk
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  The psychophysics of sugar concentration discrimination and contrast evaluation in bumblebees.

Authors:  Vladislav Nachev; James D Thomson; York Winter
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2012-11-22       Impact factor: 3.084

7.  Time management and nectar flow: flower handling and suction feeding in long-proboscid flies (Nemestrinidae: Prosoeca).

Authors:  Florian Karolyi; Linde Morawetz; Jonathan F Colville; Stephan Handschuh; Brian D Metscher; Harald W Krenn
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2013-11-21

8.  Fearful foragers: honey bees tune colony and individual foraging to multi-predator presence and food quality.

Authors:  Ken Tan; Zongwen Hu; Weiwen Chen; Zhengwei Wang; Yuchong Wang; James C Nieh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-30       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Suitability of a novel diet for a parasitic wasp, Cotesia plutellae.

Authors:  Olalekan J Soyelu
Journal:  J Insect Sci       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 1.857

10.  Quality versus quantity: Foraging decisions in the honeybee (Apis mellifera scutellata) feeding on wildflower nectar and fruit juice.

Authors:  Kyle Shackleton; Nicholas J Balfour; Hasan Al Toufailia; Roberto Gaioski; Marcela de Matos Barbosa; Carina A de S Silva; José M S Bento; Denise A Alves; Francis L W Ratnieks
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 2.912

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.