| Literature DB >> 31963808 |
Ye Eun Park1, Min Seo Kim1, Kyung Won Shim2, You-Il Kim3, Jaeryang Chu3, Byoung-Kook Kim3, In Suk Choi3, Ji Yeon Kim1.
Abstract
Probiotics can improve the intestinal environment by enhancing beneficial bacteria to potentially regulate lipid levels; however, the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of Lactobacillus plantarum Q180 (LPQ180) on postprandial lipid metabolism and the intestinal microbiome environment from a clinical perspective. A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study was conducted including 70 participants of both sexes, 20 years of age and older, with healthy blood triacylglyceride (TG) levels below 200 mg/dL. Treatment with LPQ180 for 12 weeks significantly decreased LDL-cholesterol (p = 0.042) and apolipoprotein (Apo)B-100 (p = 0.003) levels, and decreased postprandial maximum concentrations (Cmax) and areas under the curve (AUC) of TG, chylomicron TG, ApoB-48, and ApoB-100. LPQ180 treatment significantly decreased total indole and phenol levels (p = 0.019). In addition, there was a negative correlation between baseline microbiota abundance and lipid marker change, which was negatively correlated with metabolites. This study suggests that LPQ180 might be developed as a functional ingredient to help maintain healthy postprandial lipid levels through modulating gut environment.Entities:
Keywords: LPQ180; correlation; intestinal microbiota; intestinal microbiota metabolites; lipid mechanism; postprandial lipids; probiotics
Year: 2020 PMID: 31963808 PMCID: PMC7019774 DOI: 10.3390/nu12010255
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Figure 1Flow chart of registered participants for the clinical trial.
Baseline characteristics of the subjects 1.
| Variables | Placebo ( | LPQ 180 ( | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gender (male/female) | 12/23 | 12/23 | 1.000 |
| Age (year) | 48.3 ± 13.2 | 48.3 ± 11.6 | 1.000 |
| Menopause (Y/N/NA) | 14/9/12 | 13/10/12 | 0.956 |
| Postmenopausal period (month) | 118.1 ± 101.2 | 114.8 ± 91.2 | 0.930 |
| Body weight (kg) | 68.9 ± 11.1 | 69.8 ± 11.2 | 0.745 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 25.7 ± 2.5 | 26.4 ± 2.5 | 0.209 |
| Waist circumference (cm) | 85.6 ± 6.7 | 86.7 ± 7.5 | 0.493 |
| Hip circumference (cm) | 96.7 ± 4.8 | 97.1 ± 6.4 | 0.737 |
| Alcohol drinker (Y/N) | 20/15 | 15/20 | 0.232 |
| Alcohol amount (g/week, per drinker) | 44.9 ± 61.2 | 27.1 ± 26.3 | 0.254 |
| Smoker (Y/N) | 5/30 | 4/31 | 1.000 |
| Smoking amount (cigarettes/day, per smoker) | 9.0 ± 2.2 | 7.0 ± 4.2 | 0.390 |
| Physical Activity (MET-min/week) | 1335.8 ± 1150 | 1757.1 ± 2375 | 0.350 |
| Blood lipid profiles | |||
| TG (mg/dL) | 134.2 ± 66.7 | 133.4 ± 58.9 | 0.958 |
| TC (mg/dL) | 206.3 ± 37.1 | 196.8 ± 41.6 | 0.316 |
| LDL-C (mg/dL) | 120.5 ± 31.3 | 114.4 ± 36.4 | 0.458 |
| HDL-C (mg/dL) | 50.1 ± 11.8 | 46.9 ± 11.4 | 0.253 |
| VLDL-C (mg/dL) | 26.8 ± 13.3 | 26.7 ± 11.8 | 0.958 |
| Blood pressure | |||
| SBP (mmHg) | 120.0 ± 13.4 | 122.9 ± 15.1 | 0.410 |
| DBP (mmHg) | 71.7 ± 8.1 | 73.0 ± 10.2 | 0.543 |
| RFS | 23.5 ± 6.9 | 23.6 ± 6.8 | 0.944 |
| MEDIFITCTS score | 36.4 ± 22.2 | 38.6 ± 24.0 | 0.695 |
| Dietary intake | |||
| Energy (kcal/day) | 1402.4 ± 429.5 | 1549.0 ± 377.5 | 0.156 |
| Carbohydrate (g/day) | 195.2 ± 74.9 | 226.2 ± 63.0 | 0.081 |
| Protein (g/day) | 59.9 ± 20.1 | 58.3 ± 17.2 | 0.729 |
| Fat (g/day) | 42.4 ± 17.7 | 45.6 ± 20.5 | 0.506 |
| Sodium (mg/day) | 3187.3 ± 1542 | 2995.6 ± 1041.4 | 0.564 |
1 Mean ± SD (all such values). LPQ180, Lactobacillus plantarum Q180; NA, not applicable; BMI, body mass index; RFS, recommended food score; MEDFICTS, meats, eggs, dairy, frying foods, in baked goods, convenience foods, table fats, snack; TG, triglyceride; TC, total cholesterol; LDL-C, low density lipoprotein cholesterol; HDL-C, high density lipoprotein cholesterol; VLDL-C, very low density lipoprotein cholesterol; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure. 2 Student’s t-test for continuous variables and Chi-square test for categorical variables were used to compare the difference between the groups.
Changes of summary valued of lipids after 12 weeks 1.
| Variables | Placebo ( | LPQ 180 ( | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| TG (mg/dL) | 20.6 ± 9.9 | −2.0 ± 9.9 | 0.243 |
| TC (mg/dL) | 1.6 ± 3.6 | −8.1 ± 3.6 | 0.165 |
| LDL-C (mg/dL) | 13.8 ± 2.8 | 2.3 ± 3.0 | 0.042 |
| HDL-C (mg/dL) | 4.0 ± 1.1 | 3.1 ± 1.1 | 0.682 |
| VLDL-C (mg/dL) | 4.1 ± 2.0 | −0.4 ± 2.0 | 0.243 |
| Chylomicron TG (mg/dL) | 38.9 ± 8.9 | 25.0 ± 9.5 | 0.442 |
| ApoB-48 (ng/mL) | 1.0 ± 4.7 | −11.2 ± 5.0 | 0.202 |
| ApoB-100 (ng/mL) | 47.8 ± 13.8 | −38.2 ± 14.6 | 0.003 |
|
| |||
| TG | |||
| AUC (mg min / dL) | |||
| 0–2 h | 4112 ± 1458 | −183 ± 1550 | 0.160 |
| 0–4 h | 7821 ± 2729 | −1655 ± 2901 | 0.099 |
| 0–6 h | 11,714 ± 3808 | −4171 ± 4049 | 0.049 |
| 2–4 h | 3708 ± 1336 | −1473 ± 1421 | 0.067 |
| 4–6 h | 3893 ± 1326 | −2516 ± 1410 | 0.023 |
| Excursion (mg/dL) | 19 ± 12 | −26 ± 13 | 0.075 |
| Cmax (mg/dL) | 53 ± 15 | −26 ± 16 | 0.016 |
| Tmax (min) | −14 ± 11 | 16 ± 12 | 0.208 |
| Chylomicron TG | |||
| AUC (mg min / dL) | |||
| 0–2 h | 5234 ± 1178 | 2756 ± 1253 | 0.314 |
| 0–4 h | 9921 ± 2168 | 4781 ± 2305 | 0.257 |
| 0–6 h | 14,744 ± 3014 | 5413 ± 3204 | 0.140 |
| 2–4 h | 4687 ± 1035 | 2025 ± 1101 | 0.219 |
| 4–6 h | 4823 ± 1045 | 632 ± 1111 | 0.058 |
| Excursion (mg/dL) | 7 ± 10 | −33 ± 11 | 0.067 |
| Cmax (mg/dL) | 51 ± 12 | −7 ± 13 | 0.020 |
| Tmax (min) | −14 ± 12 | −5 ± 13 | 0.735 |
| ApoB-48 | |||
| AUC (ng min / mL) | |||
| 0–2 h | 640 ± 509 | −1017 ± 541 | 0.122 |
| 0–4 h | 1515 ± 1164 | −2320 ± 1238 | 0.117 |
| 0–6 h | 2240 ± 1323 | −2818 ± 1407 | 0.070 |
| 2–4 h | 875 ± 656 | −1304 ± 698 | 0.115 |
| 4–6 h | 725 ± 274 | −498 ± 292 | 0.036 |
| Excursion (ng/mL) | 12 ± 7 | 6 ± 7 | 0.672 |
| Cmax (ng/mL) | 14 ± 5 | −6 ± 5 | 0.063 |
| Tmax (min) | −51 ± 20 | −10 ± 22 | 0.341 |
| ApoB-100 | |||
| AUC (ng min / mL) | |||
| 0–2 h | 5779 ± 1535 | −3597 ± 1632 | 0.005 |
| 0–4 h | 9047 ± 3046 | −7560 ± 3239 | 0.011 |
| 0–6 h | 10,212 ± 4492 | −11,442 ± 4776 | 0.024 |
| 2–4 h | 3269 ± 1637 | −3963 ± 1740 | 0.038 |
| 4–6 h | 1165 ± 1595 | −3882 ± 1696 | 0.132 |
| Excursion (ng/mL) | −14 ± 9 | −3 ± 9 | 0.560 |
| Cmax (ng/mL) | 45 ± 12 | −35 ± 13 | 0.003 |
| Tmax (min) | −65 ± 29 | −26 ± 31 | 0.519 |
1 LSmean ± SE (all values). LPQ 180, Lactobacillus plantarum Q180; TG, triacylglyceride; AUC, area under the curve; Excursion, difference between minimum and maximum concentration; Cmax, maximum concentration; Tmax, time to reach maximum concentration. 2 A linear mixed-effect model was used to analyze the effect of the group by time interaction for 12 weeks.
Figure 2Changes in the intestinal microflora: (A) intestinal flora diversity represented by Shannon index (Alpha-diversity); (B) distance analysis between microbial communities by group (NMDS: Non-metric Multidimensional Scaling); (C) 12-week change in the placebo and LPQ180 groups of Actinobacteria, the upper level of Eggerthella spp.; and (D) microbial community significantly changing between Week 0 and Week 12 at genus level (Eggerthella spp.).
Comparison of intestinal microbial metabolites in feces for 12 weeks 1.
| Variables | Placebo ( | LPQ 180 ( | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total Biogenic amines(mg/g) | 3.62 ± 2.91 | −0.62 ± 3.01 | 0.459 |
| Short chain fatty acid (µg/g) | |||
| Unbranched SCFA | 40.83 ± 28.95 | −4.22 ± 30.57 | 0.433 |
| Branched SCFA | 4.09 ± 7.62 | −3.39 ± 8.05 | 0.620 |
| Total SCFA | 44.93 ± 35.69 | −7.61 ± 37.69 | 0.458 |
| Total Indoles and phenols (µg/g) | 44.27 ± 78.54 | −334.49 ± 86.33 | 0.019 |
| Total Neutral sterol (µg/g) | 69.84 ± 39.65 | 65.20 ± 39.65 | 0.952 |
| Bile acids (µg/g) | |||
| Primary | −0.54 ± 0.50 | 0.70 ± 0.50 | 0.205 |
| Secondary | 36.23 ± 27.21 | 36.01 ± 27.21 | 0.997 |
| Total bile acid | 35.69 ± 27.20 | 36.70 ± 27.20 | 0.985 |
1 LS mean ± SE (all values). LPQ 180, Lactobacillus plantarum Q180. 2 A linear mixed-effect model was used to analyze the effect of the group by time interaction for 12 weeks.
Correlation between baseline levels of the intestinal microbiome and changes in blood lipid markers or fecal metabolites for 12 weeks 1.
| Variables | Placebo ( | LPQ 180 ( | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| r 2 |
| r 2 |
| ||
|
| Δ TG | 0.118 | 0.689 | −0.325 | 0.075 |
| Δ TC | 0.119 | 0.523 | −0.327 | 0.073 | |
| Δ Apo B | 0.032 | 0.864 | −0.331 | 0.069 | |
| Δ Indole and phenols | 0.017 | 0.929 | −0.447 | 0.012 | |
|
| Δ TC | −0.012 | 0.950 | −0.345 | 0.058 |
| Δ LDL-C | −0.106 | 0.571 | −0.420 | 0.019 | |
|
| Δ TG | 0.040 | 0.892 | −0.407 | 0.023 |
| Δ Biogenic amines | −0.056 | 0.766 | −0.318 | 0.082 | |
|
| Δ HDL-C | 0.174 | 0.351 | 0.414 | 0.021 |
|
| Δ SCFA | 0.163 | 0.382 | 0.508 | 0.004 |
| Δ primary bile acids | −0.228 | 0.218 | −0.520 | 0.003 | |
|
| Δ SCFA | 0.105 | 0.574 | 0.518 | 0.003 |
| Δ primary bile acids | −0.227 | 0.219 | −0.556 | 0.001 | |
1 LPQ 180, Lactobacillus plantarum Q180. 2 r: Pearson’s correlation coefficients.
Correlation between baseline levels of fecal metabolites and changes in blood lipid markers for 12 weeks 1.
| Variables | Placebo ( | LPQ 180 ( | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| r 2 |
| r 2 |
| ||
| Biogenic amines | Δ TG AUC | −0.243 | 0.204 | −0.348 | 0.104 |
| Δ CM TG Cmax | −0.326 | 0.104 | −0.373 | 0.080 | |
| Δ Apo B-48 Cmax | −0.156 | 0.428 | −0.437 | 0.033 | |
| Indole and phenols | Δ HDL-C | 0.219 | 0.237 | 0.407 | 0.023 |
| Neutral sterol | Δ ApoB-100 | −0.111 | 0.575 | −0.308 | 0.092 |
1 LPQ 180, Lactobacillus plantarum Q180. 2 r: Pearson’s correlation coefficients.