| Literature DB >> 23638368 |
Leo Lahti1,2, Anne Salonen1,3, Riina A Kekkonen4, Jarkko Salojärvi1, Jonna Jalanka-Tuovinen1, Airi Palva1, Matej Orešič5, Willem M de Vos1,2,3.
Abstract
Accumulating evidence indicates that the intestinal microbiota regulates our physiology and metabolism. Bacteria marketed as probiotics confer health benefits that may arise from their ability to affect the microbiota. Here high-throughput screening of the intestinal microbiota was carried out and integrated with serum lipidomic profiling data to study the impact of probiotic intervention on the intestinal ecosystem, and to explore the associations between the intestinal bacteria and serum lipids. We performed a comprehensive intestinal microbiota analysis using a phylogenetic microarray before and after Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG intervention. While a specific increase in the L. rhamnosus-related bacteria was observed during the intervention, no other changes in the composition or stability of the microbiota were detected. After the intervention, lactobacilli returned to their initial levels. As previously reported, also the serum lipid profiles remained unaltered during the intervention. Based on a high-resolution microbiota analysis, intake of L. rhamnosus GG did not modify the composition of the intestinal ecosystem in healthy adults, indicating that probiotics confer their health effects by other mechanisms. The most prevailing association between the gut microbiota and lipid profiles was a strong positive correlation between uncultured phylotypes of Ruminococcus gnavus-group and polyunsaturated serum triglycerides of dietary origin. Moreover, a positive correlation was detected between serum cholesterol and Collinsella (Coriobacteriaceae). These associations identified with the spectrometric lipidome profiling were corroborated by enzymatically determined cholesterol and triglyceride levels. Actinomycetaceae correlated negatively with triglycerides of highly unsaturated fatty acids while a set of Proteobacteria showed negative correlation with ether phosphatidylcholines. Our results suggest that several members of the Firmicutes, Actinobacteria and Proteobacteria may be involved in the metabolism of dietary and endogenous lipids, and provide a scientific rationale for further human studies to explore the role of intestinal microbes in host lipid metabolism.Entities:
Keywords: Gastrointestinal tract; High-throughput profiling; Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG; Lipidomics; Microbiota; Physiology; Probiotics
Year: 2013 PMID: 23638368 PMCID: PMC3628737 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.32
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PeerJ ISSN: 2167-8359 Impact factor: 2.984
Figure 1Flowchart of the study subjects during the trial.
Stability of microbiota and lipid profiles in the probiotic and placebo groups.
We determined the similarity (expressed as Pearson’s correlation) both within and between the time points (TP) for the microbiota and lipid profiles by the average scatter r of the profiles. Lipid data is available for the first two time points (TP1 and TP2, three weeks before the intervention and during the intervention, respectively), and not available (−) for the third time point (TP3) measured three weeks after the intervention.
| Between subjects | Within subjects | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| TP1 | TP2 | TP3 | TP1 vs TP2 | TP3 vs TP2 |
| Probiotic | 0.78 | 0.78 | 0.78 | 0.94 | 0.95 |
| Placebo | 0.76 | 0.77 | 0.77 | 0.94 | 0.95 |
|
| |||||
| Probiotic | 0.90 | 0.89 | – | 0.92 | – |
| Placebo | 0.91 | 0.89 | – | 0.93 | – |
Figure 2Intervention effects on the abundance of L. rhamnosus.
Mean abundance of L. rhamnosus among the study subjects before, during and after the probiotic intervention (the time points 1–3, respectively) quantified by the HITChip hybridization signal. The error bars denote the Gaussian 95% confidence limits based on standard deviation of the mean.
Figure 3Correlations between intestinal genus-level phylogenetic groups and serum lipids.
The correlations between the intestinal bacteria and serum lipids are indicated by colors (red: positive; blue: negative). The significant correlations (q < 0.05) are indicated by ‘ + ’; only lipids and bacteria with at least one significant correlation are shown. Hierarchical clustering of the rows and columns highlights groups of significantly correlated bacteria and lipids. Lipids have been named according to Lipid Maps (http://www.lipidmaps.org) with the following abbreviations: Cer: ceramide; ChoE: cholesteryl ester; lysoPC: lysophosphatidylcholine; PA: phosphatidic acid; PG: phosphatidylglycerol; PC: phosphatidylcholine; PS: phosphatidylserine; SM: sphingomyelin; TG: triglyceride. Where the fatty acid composition could not be determined, the total number of carbons and double bonds is indicated. The first number indicates the amount of carbon atoms in the fatty acid molecule, followed by the number of double bonds. For further details, see the Methods section.
Figure 5Association between Collinsella spp. and serum cholesterol.
The relative amounts of Collinsella spp. were quantified by the HITChip analysis, and serum cholesterol levels were determined by two independent techniques: A Cholesterol ester ChoE(20:5) (see Fig. 3 for explanation) by mass spectrometry (r = 0.59); B low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol by enzymatic assay (r = 0.57).
Associations between genus-level bacterial groups and enzymatically determined lipids.
Associations between the relative amounts of genus-level bacterial groups as determined by the HITChip analysis and the serum lipid concentrations are quantified with a biweight midcorrelation. Only significant positive and negative correlations are shown (q < 0.05; otherwise ‘−’). Abbreviations: Total cholesterol (TC), high-density lipoprotein (HDL) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, triglyceride (TG). Correlations between genus-level bacterial groups and mass spectrometry-determined lipids are provided in Supplemental Table S3.
| Phyla/Firmicute order | Genus-level taxon | TC | LDL | HDL | TG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actinobacteria |
| 0.56 | 0.57 | – | – |
| Bacilli |
| – | – | −0.58 | 0.50 |
| Bacteroidetes |
| – | – | – | −0.47 |
| Bacteroidetes |
| – | – | – | −0.47 |
| Bacteroidetes |
| – | – | – | −0.45 |
| Clostridium cluster XI |
| – | – | −0.48 | 0.49 |
| Clostridium cluster XIVa |
| – | – | −0.45 | – |
| Clostridium cluster XIVa |
| – | – | – | 0.46 |
| Clostridium cluster XIVa |
| – | – | −0.56 | 0.57 |
| Clostridium cluster XIVa |
| – | – | – | 0.47 |
| Clostridium cluster XIVa |
| – | – | −0.46 | 0.60 |
| Clostridium cluster XIVa |
| – | – | −0.48 | 0.51 |
| Clostridium cluster XV |
| – | – | −0.45 | – |
| Clostridium cluster XVI |
| 0.48 | 0.47 | – | – |
| Clostridium cluster XVI |
| – | – | −0.45 | – |
| Uncultured Clostridiales | Uncultured | – | – | 0.53 | −0.45 |
| Uncultured Clostridiales | Uncultured | – | – | – | −0.54 |
Figure 4Association between Ruminococcus gnavus et rel. and serum triglyceride (TG) lipids.
The relative amounts of R. gnavus et rel. were quantified by the HITChip analysis and the triglyceride concentration was determined based on two independent techniques: A the triglyceride TG(54:5) (see Fig. 3 for explanation) by mass spectrometry (r = 0.61); B triglyceride by an enzymatic assay (r = 0.60).