Xinfeng Zhang1,2,3, Dandan Wang4, Zhuangkai Liu1,2, Zheng Wang5, Qiang Li5, Hong Xu1,2, Bin Zhang1,2, Ting Liu6, Feng Jin3. 1. Department of Breast Surgery, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning 110042, China. 2. Department of Breast Surgery, Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute, Shenyang 110042, China. 3. Department of Breast Surgery, the First affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110001, China. 4. Department of Radiology, Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute, Shenyang 110042, China. 5. Department of Pathology, Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute, Shenyang 110042, China. 6. Department of Radiology, the First affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110001, China.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) who achieve a pathologic complete response (pCR) can be identified preoperatively and can potentially be spared the morbidity of surgery. The objective of this retrospective study was to estimate the diagnostic accuracy of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in predicting pCR in patients with different molecular subtypes of breast cancer and to provide a basis for the selection of surgical methods. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed breast MRI data from August 2015 to December 2018 of patients who underwent four or more cycles of NAC. Factors associated with radiological complete response (rCR) and pCR were analyzed in univariable and multivariable settings. The accuracy of MRI and the correlation between rCR and pCR were also analyzed in each tumor subtype. RESULTS: A total of 177 women with a primary tumor fulfilled the study criteria; 18 of these patients (10.2%) achieved rCR, and 21 (11.9%) achieved a pCR. MRI diagnosis of rCR was significantly correlated with pCR with a Spearman's correlation coefficient of 0.686 in the entire population. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, pCR predictive value (PPV), and non-pCR predictive value (NPV) were estimated to be 66.67%, 97.44%, 93.79%, 77.78%, and 95.60%, respectively. Statistically significant correlations between rCR and pCR were found in Luminal B high Ki67% (P<0.001), HER2-positive (P=0.0035), and triple-negative (P<0.001) subtypes, but not in Luminal A and Luminal B low Ki67% subtypes. On univariate analysis, the tumor characteristics significantly associated with both rCR and pCR were small tumor, lymph node metastasis (LNM) negativity, early clinical stage, high grade, high Ki67% index, and different molecular subtype. On multivariate logistic regression analysis, grade 3 tumors (P=0.013), Ki67% ≥40% (P<0.000), and stage I tumor (P=0.006) were independently associated with rCR. However, grade 3 tumors (P=0.001), triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), and clinical stages I and II tumors (P=0.003; P=0.030) were independently associated with the likelihood of attaining a pCR. CONCLUSIONS: The overall accuracy of MRI in predicting pCR in invasive breast cancer patients who received NAC was 93.8%. The performance of MRI differed among molecular subtypes, and the highest PPV was found in TNBC (100%) and Luminal B high Ki67% (75%) subtypes. 2020 Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery. All rights reserved.
BACKGROUND: Patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) who achieve a pathologic complete response (pCR) can be identified preoperatively and can potentially be spared the morbidity of surgery. The objective of this retrospective study was to estimate the diagnostic accuracy of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in predicting pCR in patients with different molecular subtypes of breast cancer and to provide a basis for the selection of surgical methods. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed breast MRI data from August 2015 to December 2018 of patients who underwent four or more cycles of NAC. Factors associated with radiological complete response (rCR) and pCR were analyzed in univariable and multivariable settings. The accuracy of MRI and the correlation between rCR and pCR were also analyzed in each tumor subtype. RESULTS: A total of 177 women with a primary tumor fulfilled the study criteria; 18 of these patients (10.2%) achieved rCR, and 21 (11.9%) achieved a pCR. MRI diagnosis of rCR was significantly correlated with pCR with a Spearman's correlation coefficient of 0.686 in the entire population. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, pCR predictive value (PPV), and non-pCR predictive value (NPV) were estimated to be 66.67%, 97.44%, 93.79%, 77.78%, and 95.60%, respectively. Statistically significant correlations between rCR and pCR were found in Luminal B high Ki67% (P<0.001), HER2-positive (P=0.0035), and triple-negative (P<0.001) subtypes, but not in Luminal A and Luminal B low Ki67% subtypes. On univariate analysis, the tumor characteristics significantly associated with both rCR and pCR were small tumor, lymph node metastasis (LNM) negativity, early clinical stage, high grade, high Ki67% index, and different molecular subtype. On multivariate logistic regression analysis, grade 3 tumors (P=0.013), Ki67% ≥40% (P<0.000), and stage I tumor (P=0.006) were independently associated with rCR. However, grade 3 tumors (P=0.001), triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), and clinical stages I and II tumors (P=0.003; P=0.030) were independently associated with the likelihood of attaining a pCR. CONCLUSIONS: The overall accuracy of MRI in predicting pCR in invasive breast cancer patients who received NAC was 93.8%. The performance of MRI differed among molecular subtypes, and the highest PPV was found in TNBC (100%) and Luminal B high Ki67% (75%) subtypes. 2020 Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery. All rights reserved.
Entities:
Keywords:
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); breast cancer; molecular subtypes; neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC); pathologic complete response (pCR)
Authors: Jennifer F De Los Santos; Alan Cantor; Keith D Amos; Andres Forero; Mehra Golshan; Janet K Horton; Clifford A Hudis; Nola M Hylton; Kandace McGuire; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Ingrid M Meszoely; Rita Nanda; E Shelley Hwang Journal: Cancer Date: 2013-02-21 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Stephen F Sener; Rachel E Sargent; Connie Lee; Tejas Manchandia; Vivian Le-Tran; Yuliya Olimpiadi; Nicole Zaremba; Andrew Alabd; Maria Nelson; Julie E Lang Journal: J Surg Oncol Date: 2019-08-09 Impact factor: 3.454
Authors: Aman U Buzdar; Nuhad K Ibrahim; Deborah Francis; Daniel J Booser; Eva S Thomas; Richard L Theriault; Lajos Pusztai; Marjorie C Green; Banu K Arun; Sharon H Giordano; Massimo Cristofanilli; Debra K Frye; Terry L Smith; Kelly K Hunt; Sonja E Singletary; Aysegul A Sahin; Michael S Ewer; Thomas A Buchholz; Donald Berry; Gabriel N Hortobagyi Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2005-02-28 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Armando E Giuliano; James L Connolly; Stephen B Edge; Elizabeth A Mittendorf; Hope S Rugo; Lawrence J Solin; Donald L Weaver; David J Winchester; Gabriel N Hortobagyi Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2017-03-14 Impact factor: 508.702
Authors: Keith N Ogston; Iain D Miller; Simon Payne; Andrew W Hutcheon; Tarun K Sarkar; Ian Smith; A Schofield; Steven D Heys Journal: Breast Date: 2003-10 Impact factor: 4.380
Authors: A Ring; A Webb; S Ashley; W H Allum; S Ebbs; G Gui; N P Sacks; G Walsh; I E Smith Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2003-12-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Freddie Bray; Jacques Ferlay; Isabelle Soerjomataram; Rebecca L Siegel; Lindsey A Torre; Ahmedin Jemal Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2018-09-12 Impact factor: 508.702
Authors: Robert Browne; Peter McAnena; Niamh O'Halloran; Brian M Moloney; Emily Crilly; Michael J Kerin; Aoife J Lowery Journal: Breast Cancer (Auckl) Date: 2022-06-24
Authors: Bruna M Thompson; Luciano F Chala; Carlos Shimizu; Max S Mano; José R Filassi; Felipe C Geyer; Ulysses S Torres; Giselle Guedes Netto de Mello; Cláudia da Costa Leite Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2021-10-30 Impact factor: 7.034
Authors: Daniel Canteros; Benjamin Walbaum; Miguel Córdova-Delgado; Andrés Torrealba; Constanza Reyes; María Elena Navarro; Dravna Razmilic; Mauricio Camus; Francisco Dominguez; Orieta Navarrete; Mauricio P Pinto; Gonzalo Pizarro; Francisco Acevedo; César Sánchez Journal: Ecancermedicalscience Date: 2022-05-23