Literature DB >> 33936977

Dual-energy CT quantitative parameters for the differentiation of benign from malignant lesions and the prediction of histopathological and molecular subtypes in breast cancer.

Xiaoxia Wang1, Daihong Liu1, Xiangfei Zeng1, Shixi Jiang1, Lan Li1, Tao Yu1, Jiuquan Zhang1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) is widely used to characterize and differentiate tumors. However, data regarding its diagnostic performance for the characterization of breast tumors are limited. In this study, we assessed the diagnostic performance of quantitative parameters derived from DECT in differentiating benign from malignant lesions and predicting histopathological and molecular subtypes in patients with breast cancer.
METHODS: Dual-phase contrast-enhanced DECT of the thorax was performed on participants with breast tumors. Conventional CT attenuation and DECT quantitative parameters, including normalized iodine concentration (NIC), the slope of the spectral Hounsfield unit curve (λHu), and normalized effective atomic number (nZeff), were obtained and compared between benign and malignant lesions, invasive non-special carcinoma, and ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), and among the four molecular subtypes of breast cancer. The diagnostic performance of the quantitative parameters was analyzed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.
RESULTS: This study included 130 participants with 161 breast lesions (44 benign and 117 malignant). In the arterial and venous phase, NICs, λHu, nZeff, and attenuation were higher in malignant lesions than benign lesions (all P<0.001). The venous phase λHu had the best differential diagnostic capability, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.90, a sensitivity of 84.1% (37 of 44), a specificity of 86.3% (101 of 117), and an accuracy of 85.7% (138 of 161). The NICs in the arterial and venous phases were higher in invasive non-special carcinoma than DCIS (both P<0.001). In terms of diagnostic performance, NIC in the venous phase had an AUC of 0.77, a sensitivity of 75.0% (12 of 16), a specificity of 81.2% (82 of 101), and an accuracy of 80.3% (94 of 117). The luminal A subtype produced a lower venous phase NIC, and arterial and venous phase nZeff than the non-luminal A subtype (AUC of 0.91 for the combination of these three parameters).
CONCLUSIONS: Dual-energy CT quantitative parameters are a feasible and valuable noninvasive means of differentiating between benign and malignant lesions, and predicting histopathological and molecular subtypes in patients with breast cancer. 2021 Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dual-energy CT; breast tumors; molecular subtypes; pathological classification; quantitative parameters

Year:  2021        PMID: 33936977      PMCID: PMC8047348          DOI: 10.21037/qims-20-825

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg        ISSN: 2223-4306


  33 in total

Review 1.  Breast cancer complexity: implications of intratumoral heterogeneity in clinical management.

Authors:  Brittany Haynes; Ashapurna Sarma; Pratima Nangia-Makker; Malathy P Shekhar
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 9.264

2.  Multi-detector spiral CT study of the relationships between pulmonary ground-glass nodules and blood vessels.

Authors:  Feng Gao; Ming Li; Xiaojun Ge; Xiangpeng Zheng; Qingguo Ren; Yan Chen; Fangzhen Lv; Yanqing Hua
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-07-06       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Differentiating intrapulmonary metastases from different primary tumors via quantitative dual-energy CT based iodine concentration and conventional CT attenuation.

Authors:  Dominik Deniffel; Andreas Sauter; Julia Dangelmaier; Alexander Fingerle; Ernst J Rummeny; Daniela Pfeiffer
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2018-12-14       Impact factor: 3.528

Review 4.  Machine learning in breast MRI.

Authors:  Beatriu Reig; Laura Heacock; Krzysztof J Geras; Linda Moy
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2019-07-05       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  Differentiation of benign and malignant neck pathologies: preliminary experience using spectral computed tomography.

Authors:  Ashok Srinivasan; Robert A Parker; Abhishek Manjunathan; Mohannad Ibrahim; Gaurang V Shah; Suresh K Mukherji
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2013 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.826

6.  Tumor biology correlates with rates of breast-conserving surgery and pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer: findings from the ACOSOG Z1071 (Alliance) Prospective Multicenter Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Judy C Boughey; Linda M McCall; Karla V Ballman; Elizabeth A Mittendorf; Gretchen M Ahrendt; Lee G Wilke; Bret Taback; A Marilyn Leitch; Teresa Flippo-Morton; Kelly K Hunt
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Peripheral lung carcinoma: correlation of angiogenesis and first-pass perfusion parameters of 64-detector row CT.

Authors:  Yuan Li; Zhi-Gang Yang; Tian-Wu Chen; Hui-Jiao Chen; Jia-Yu Sun; Yan-Rong Lu
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2007-12-04       Impact factor: 5.705

8.  Comparison of Breast Cancer Molecular Features and Survival by African and European Ancestry in The Cancer Genome Atlas.

Authors:  Dezheng Huo; Hai Hu; Suhn K Rhie; Eric R Gamazon; Andrew D Cherniack; Jianfang Liu; Toshio F Yoshimatsu; Jason J Pitt; Katherine A Hoadley; Melissa Troester; Yuanbin Ru; Tara Lichtenberg; Lori A Sturtz; Carl S Shelley; Christopher C Benz; Gordon B Mills; Peter W Laird; Craig D Shriver; Charles M Perou; Olufunmilayo I Olopade
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 31.777

9.  The diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in predicting pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with different molecular subtypes of breast cancer.

Authors:  Xinfeng Zhang; Dandan Wang; Zhuangkai Liu; Zheng Wang; Qiang Li; Hong Xu; Bin Zhang; Ting Liu; Feng Jin
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2020-01

10.  Differentiation of Malignant and Benign Incidental Breast Lesions Detected by Chest Multidetector-Row Computed Tomography: Added Value of Quantitative Enhancement Analysis.

Authors:  Yu-Pang Lin; Hsian-He Hsu; Kai-Hsiung Ko; Chi-Ming Chu; Yu-Ching Chou; Wei-Chou Chang; Tsun-Hou Chang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  5 in total

1.  Application of machine learning with multiparametric dual-energy computed tomography of the breast to differentiate between benign and malignant lesions.

Authors:  Xiaosong Lan; Xiaoxia Wang; Jun Qi; Huifang Chen; Xiangfei Zeng; Jinfang Shi; Daihong Liu; Hesong Shen; Jiuquan Zhang
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2022-01

2.  Deep learning radiomics of dual-energy computed tomography for predicting lymph node metastases of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Chao An; Dongyang Li; Sheng Li; Wangzhong Li; Tong Tong; Lizhi Liu; Dongping Jiang; Linling Jiang; Guangying Ruan; Ning Hai; Yan Fu; Kun Wang; Shuiqing Zhuo; Jie Tian
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2021-10-15       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Dual-source dual-energy computed tomography-derived quantitative parameters combined with machine learning for the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant thyroid nodules.

Authors:  Liling Jiang; Daihong Liu; Ling Long; Jiao Chen; Xiaosong Lan; Jiuquan Zhang
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2022-02

4.  Using quantitative parameters derived from pretreatment dual-energy computed tomography to predict histopathologic features in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Hesong Shen; Yuanying Huang; Xiaoqian Yuan; Daihong Liu; Chunrong Tu; Yu Wang; Xiaoqin Li; Xiaoxia Wang; Qiuzhi Chen; Jiuquan Zhang
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2022-02

5.  Application of Dual-Energy Spectral Computed Tomography in Bone Mineral Density Measurement: Phantom and Clinical Research.

Authors:  Mingyue Wang; Yan Wu; Yue Zhou; Junqiang Dong; Shenshen Hu; Ping Hou; Jianbo Gao
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2022-08-29
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.