Literature DB >> 23436342

Magnetic resonance imaging as a predictor of pathologic response in patients treated with neoadjuvant systemic treatment for operable breast cancer. Translational Breast Cancer Research Consortium trial 017.

Jennifer F De Los Santos1, Alan Cantor, Keith D Amos, Andres Forero, Mehra Golshan, Janet K Horton, Clifford A Hudis, Nola M Hylton, Kandace McGuire, Funda Meric-Bernstam, Ingrid M Meszoely, Rita Nanda, E Shelley Hwang.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Increased pathologic complete response (pCR) rates observed with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) for some subsets of patients with invasive breast cancer have prompted interest in whether patients who achieved a pCR can be identified preoperatively and potentially spared the morbidity of surgery. The objective of this multicenter, retrospective study was to estimate the accuracy of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in predicting a pCR in the breast.
METHODS: MRI studies at baseline and after the completion of NCT plus data regarding pathologic response were collected retrospectively from 746 women who received treatment at 8 institutions between 2002 and 2011. Tumors were characterized by immunohistochemical phenotype into 4 categories based on receptor expression: hormone (estrogen and progesterone) receptor (HR)-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative (n = 327), HR-positive/HER2-positive, (n = 148), HR-negative/HER2-positive, (n = 101), and triple-negative (HR-negative/HER2 negative; n = 155). In all, 194 of 249 patients (78%) with HER2-positive tumors received trastuzumab. Univariate and multivariate analyses of factors associated with radiographic complete response (rCR) and pCR were performed. RESULT: For the total group, the rCR and pCR rates were 182 of 746 patients (24%) and 179 of 746 patients (24%), respectively, and the highest pCR rate was observed for the triple-negative subtype (57 of 155 patients; 37%) and the HER2-positive subtype (38 of 101 patients; 38%). The overall accuracy of MRI for predicting pCR was 74%. The variables sensitivity, negative predictive value, positive predictive value, and accuracy differed significantly among tumor subtypes, and the greatest negative predictive value was observed in the triple-negative (60%) and HER2-positive (62%) subtypes.
CONCLUSIONS: The overall accuracy of MRI for predicting pCR in invasive breast cancer patients who were receiving NCT was 74%. The performance of MRI differed between subtypes, possibly influenced by differences in pCR rates between groups. Future studies will determine whether MRI in combination with directed core biopsy improves the predictive value of MRI for pathologic response.
Copyright © 2013 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23436342      PMCID: PMC3939707          DOI: 10.1002/cncr.27995

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  36 in total

1.  Prospective comparison of mammography, sonography, and MRI in patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy for palpable breast cancer.

Authors:  Eren Yeh; Priscilla Slanetz; Daniel B Kopans; Elizabeth Rafferty; Dianne Georgian-Smith; Linda Moy; Elkan Halpern; Richard Moore; Irene Kuter; Alphonse Taghian
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Treatment of locally advanced breast cancer without mastectomy. 5- and 10-year results of 135 tumors larger than 5 centimeters treated by external beam therapy, brachytherapy, and neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  F Baillet; C Rozec; L Ucla; L Chauveinc; M Housset; M Weil
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1993-11-30       Impact factor: 5.691

3.  Screening women at high risk for breast cancer with mammography and magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Constance D Lehman; Jeffrey D Blume; Paul Weatherall; David Thickman; Nola Hylton; Ellen Warner; Etta Pisano; Stuart J Schnitt; Constantine Gatsonis; Mitchell Schnall; Gia A DeAngelis; Paul Stomper; Eric L Rosen; Michael O'Loughlin; Steven Harms; David A Bluemke
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2005-05-01       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Accuracy of MR imaging for revealing residual breast cancer in patients who have undergone neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Savannah C Partridge; Jessica E Gibbs; Ying Lu; Laura J Esserman; Dan Sudilovsky; Nola M Hylton
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for operable breast carcinoma larger than 3 cm: a unicentre randomized trial with a 124-month median follow-up. Institut Bergonié Bordeaux Groupe Sein (IBBGS).

Authors:  L Mauriac; G MacGrogan; A Avril; M Durand; A Floquet; M Debled; J M Dilhuydy; F Bonichon
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 32.976

6.  Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer.

Authors:  Wendie A Berg; Lorena Gutierrez; Moriel S NessAiver; W Bradford Carter; Mythreyi Bhargavan; Rebecca S Lewis; Olga B Ioffe
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-10-14       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Breast cancer molecular phenotype and the use of HER2-targeted agents influence the accuracy of breast MRI after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Hyeong-Gon Moon; Wonshik Han; Soo Kyung Ahn; Nariya Cho; Woo Kyung Moon; Seock-Ah Im; In Ae Park; Dong-Young Noh
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Is surgery necessary after complete clinical remission following neoadjuvant chemotherapy for early breast cancer?

Authors:  A Ring; A Webb; S Ashley; W H Allum; S Ebbs; G Gui; N P Sacks; G Walsh; I E Smith
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-12-15       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Efficacy of MRI and mammography for breast-cancer screening in women with a familial or genetic predisposition.

Authors:  Mieke Kriege; Cecile T M Brekelmans; Carla Boetes; Peter E Besnard; Harmine M Zonderland; Inge Marie Obdeijn; Radu A Manoliu; Theo Kok; Hans Peterse; Madeleine M A Tilanus-Linthorst; Sara H Muller; Sybren Meijer; Jan C Oosterwijk; Louk V A M Beex; Rob A E M Tollenaar; Harry J de Koning; Emiel J T Rutgers; Jan G M Klijn
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-07-29       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Locally advanced breast cancer: comparison of mammography, sonography and MR imaging in evaluation of residual disease in women receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Viviana Londero; Massimo Bazzocchi; Chiara Del Frate; Fabio Puglisi; Carla Di Loreto; Giuliana Francescutti; Chiara Zuiani
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-02-18       Impact factor: 5.315

View more
  62 in total

Review 1.  Surgical issues in patients with breast cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Tari A King; Monica Morrow
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 66.675

2.  Emerging Breast Imaging Technologies on the Horizon.

Authors:  Srinivasan Vedantham; Andrew Karellas
Journal:  Semin Ultrasound CT MR       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 1.875

Review 3.  Trends and controversies in multidisciplinary care of the patient with breast cancer.

Authors:  Laura S Dominici; Monica Morrow; Elizabeth Mittendorf; Jennifer Bellon; Tari A King
Journal:  Curr Probl Surg       Date:  2016-11-29       Impact factor: 1.909

4.  Residual Disease after Neoadjuvant Therapy for Breast Cancer: Can MRI Help?

Authors:  Nola M Hylton
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2018-08-28       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Identification of Patients With Documented Pathologic Complete Response in the Breast After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Omission of Axillary Surgery.

Authors:  Audree B Tadros; Wei T Yang; Savitri Krishnamurthy; Gaiane M Rauch; Benjamin D Smith; Vicente Valero; Dalliah M Black; Anthony Lucci; Abigail S Caudle; Sarah M DeSnyder; Mediget Teshome; Carlos H Barcenas; Makesha Miggins; Beatriz E Adrada; Tanya Moseley; Rosa F Hwang; Kelly K Hunt; Henry M Kuerer
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 14.766

6.  Association of Low Nodal Positivity Rate Among Patients With ERBB2-Positive or Triple-Negative Breast Cancer and Breast Pathologic Complete Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.

Authors:  Alison U Barron; Tanya L Hoskin; Courtney N Day; E Shelley Hwang; Henry M Kuerer; Judy C Boughey
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 14.766

7.  AGO Recommendations for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Patients with Early Breast Cancer: Update 2014.

Authors:  Cornelia Liedtke; Marc Thill; Volker Hanf; Florian Schütz
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 2.860

8.  Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI Evaluation of Pathologic Complete Response in Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2)-Positive Breast Cancer After HER2-Targeted Therapy.

Authors:  Laura Heacock; Alana Lewin; Abimbola Ayoola; Melanie Moccaldi; James S Babb; Sungheon G Kim; Linda Moy
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2019-08-20       Impact factor: 3.173

9.  [Therapy monitoring of neoadjuvant therapy with MRI. RECIST and functional imaging].

Authors:  S Grandl; M Ingrisch; K Hellerhoff
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 0.635

10.  Prediction of Pathologic Complete Response in Breast Cancer Patients Comparing Magnetic Resonance Imaging with Ultrasound in Neoadjuvant Setting.

Authors:  Frederik Knude Palshof; Charlotte Lanng; Niels Kroman; Cemil Benian; Ilse Vejborg; Anne Bak; Maj-Lis Talman; Eva Balslev; Tove Filtenborg Tvedskov
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 5.344

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.