Literature DB >> 34993120

Application of machine learning with multiparametric dual-energy computed tomography of the breast to differentiate between benign and malignant lesions.

Xiaosong Lan1, Xiaoxia Wang1, Jun Qi2, Huifang Chen1, Xiangfei Zeng1, Jinfang Shi1, Daihong Liu1, Hesong Shen1, Jiuquan Zhang1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Multiparametric dual-energy computed tomography (mpDECT) is widely used to differentiate various kinds of tumors; however, the data regarding its diagnostic performance with machine learning to diagnose breast tumors is limited. We evaluated univariate analysis and machine learning performance with mpDECT to distinguish between benign and malignant breast lesions.
METHODS: In total, 172 patients with 214 breast lesions (55 benign and 159 malignant) who underwent preoperative dual-phase contrast-enhanced DECT were included in this retrospective study. Twelve quantitative features were extracted for each lesion, including CT attenuation (precontrast, arterial, and venous phases), the arterial-venous phase difference in normalized effective atomic number (nZeff), normalized iodine concentration (NIC), and slope of the spectral Hounsfield unit (HU) curve (λHu). Predictive models were developed using univariate analysis and eight machine learning methods [logistic regression, extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), stochastic gradient descent (SGD), linear discriminant analysis (LDA), adaptive boosting (AdaBoost), random forest (RF), decision tree, and linear support vector machine (SVM)]. Classification performances were assessed based on the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). The best performances of the conventional univariate analysis and machine learning methods were compared using the Delong test.
RESULTS: The univariate analysis showed that the venous phase λHu had the highest AUROC (0.88). Machine learning with mpDECT achieved an excellent and stable diagnostic performance, as shown by the mean classification performances in the training dataset (AUROC, 0.88-0.99) and testing (AUROC, 0.83-0.96) datasets. The performance of the AdaBoost model based on mpDECT was more stable than the other machine learning models and superior to the univariate analysis (AUROC, 0.96 vs. 0.88; P<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: The performance of the AdaBoost classifier based on mpDECT data achieved the highest mean accuracy compared to the other machine learning models and univariate analysis in differentiating between benign and malignant breast lesions. 2022 Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dual-energy computed tomography (DECT); breast neoplasms; machine learning

Year:  2022        PMID: 34993120      PMCID: PMC8666765          DOI: 10.21037/qims-21-39

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg        ISSN: 2223-4306


  33 in total

1.  Machine learning based on multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging to differentiate glioblastoma multiforme from primary cerebral nervous system lymphoma.

Authors:  Masataka Nakagawa; Takeshi Nakaura; Tomohiro Namimoto; Mika Kitajima; Hiroyuki Uetani; Machiko Tateishi; Seitaro Oda; Daisuke Utsunomiya; Keishi Makino; Hideo Nakamura; Akitake Mukasa; Toshinori Hirai; Yasuyuki Yamashita
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 3.528

2.  A study on several machine-learning methods for classification of malignant and benign clustered microcalcifications.

Authors:  Liyang Wei; Yongyi Yang; Robert M Nishikawa; Yulei Jiang
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 10.048

3.  Partial Youden index and its inferences.

Authors:  Chenxue Li; Jinyuan Chen; Gengsheng Qin
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 1.051

Review 4.  Recent developments of dual-energy CT in oncology.

Authors:  David Simons; Marc Kachelriess; Heinz-Peter Schlemmer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 5.  Breast cancer complexity: implications of intratumoral heterogeneity in clinical management.

Authors:  Brittany Haynes; Ashapurna Sarma; Pratima Nangia-Makker; Malathy P Shekhar
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 9.264

Review 6.  Accuracy of magnetic resonance in suspicious breast lesions: a systematic quantitative review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lidia Rosi Medeiros; Célia Scapin Duarte; Daniela Dornelles Rosa; Maria Isabel Edelweiss; Marcia Edelweiss; Fábio Rosa Silva; Erik Paul Winnnikow; Patrícia Duarte Simões Pires; Maria Inês Rosa
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2011-01-08       Impact factor: 4.872

7.  Axillary Sentinel Lymph Nodes in Breast Cancer: Quantitative Evaluation at Dual-Energy CT.

Authors:  Xiang Zhang; Chushan Zheng; Zehong Yang; Ziliang Cheng; Heran Deng; Meiwei Chen; Xiaohui Duan; Jiaji Mao; Jun Shen
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2018-08-28       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Association Between Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Proton Density Fat Fraction and Liver Histology Features in Patients With Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease or Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis.

Authors:  Benjamin Wildman-Tobriner; Michael M Middleton; Cynthia A Moylan; Stephen Rossi; Omar Flores; Zac Anchi Chang; Manal F Abdelmalek; Claude B Sirlin; Mustafa R Bashir
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 22.682

9.  Peripheral lung carcinoma: correlation of angiogenesis and first-pass perfusion parameters of 64-detector row CT.

Authors:  Yuan Li; Zhi-Gang Yang; Tian-Wu Chen; Hui-Jiao Chen; Jia-Yu Sun; Yan-Rong Lu
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2007-12-04       Impact factor: 5.705

10.  Evaluation of the performance of traditional machine learning algorithms, convolutional neural network and AutoML Vision in ultrasound breast lesions classification: a comparative study.

Authors:  Ka Wing Wan; Chun Hoi Wong; Ho Fung Ip; Dejian Fan; Pak Leung Yuen; Hoi Ying Fong; Michael Ying
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2021-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.