Literature DB >> 28294295

Breast Cancer-Major changes in the American Joint Committee on Cancer eighth edition cancer staging manual.

Armando E Giuliano1, James L Connolly2, Stephen B Edge3, Elizabeth A Mittendorf4, Hope S Rugo5, Lawrence J Solin6, Donald L Weaver7, David J Winchester8, Gabriel N Hortobagyi9.   

Abstract

Answer questions and earn CME/CNE The revision of the eighth edition of the primary tumor, lymph node, and metastasis (TNM) classification of the American Joint Commission of Cancer (AJCC) for breast cancer was determined by a multidisciplinary team of breast cancer experts. The panel recognized the need to incorporate biologic factors, such as tumor grade, proliferation rate, estrogen and progesterone receptor expression, human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2) expression, and gene expression prognostic panels into the staging system. AJCC levels of evidence and guidelines for all tumor types were followed as much as possible. The panel felt that, to maintain worldwide value, the tumor staging system should remain based on TNM anatomic factors. However, the recognition of the prognostic influence of grade, hormone receptor expression, and HER2 amplification mandated their inclusion into the staging system. The value of commercially available, gene-based assays was acknowledged and prognostic input added. Tumor biomarkers and low Oncotype DX recurrence scores can alter prognosis and stage. These updates are expected to provide additional precision and flexibility to the staging system and were based on the extent of published information and analysis of large, as yet unpublished databases. The eighth edition of the AJCC TNM staging system, thus, provides a flexible platform for prognostic classification based on traditional anatomic factors, which can be modified and enhanced using patient biomarkers and multifactorial prognostic panel data. The eighth edition remains the worldwide basis for breast cancer staging and will incorporate future online updates to remain timely and relevant. CA Cancer J Clin 2017;67:290-303.
© 2017 American Cancer Society. © 2017 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biomarkers; distant metastases; ductal carcinoma in situ; estrogen receptor; human epidermal growth receptor 1 (HER2); infiltrating ductal carcinoma; infiltrating lobular carcinoma; lobular carcinoma in situ; lymph node metastases; neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28294295     DOI: 10.3322/caac.21393

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin        ISSN: 0007-9235            Impact factor:   508.702


  202 in total

Review 1.  Next-generation sequencing-based clinical sequencing: toward precision medicine in solid tumors.

Authors:  Toshifumi Wakai; Pankaj Prasoon; Yuki Hirose; Yoshifumi Shimada; Hiroshi Ichikawa; Masayuki Nagahashi
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Propensity score analysis of the prognostic value of genomic assays for breast cancer in diverse populations using the National Cancer Data Base.

Authors:  Abiola Ibraheem; Olufunmilayo I Olopade; Dezheng Huo
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 3.  Gene Expression Profiling in Breast Cancer and Its Effect on Therapy Selection in Early-Stage Breast Cancer.

Authors:  E Nilüfer Güler
Journal:  Eur J Breast Health       Date:  2017-10-01

4.  Impact of Micrometastatic Axillary Nodes on Survival of Breast Cancer Patients with Tumors ≤2 cm.

Authors:  Hyeon Woo Bae; Kwang Hyun Yoon; Joo Heung Kim; Sung Mook Lim; Jee Ye Kim; Hyung Seok Park; Seho Park; Seung Il Kim; Young Up Cho; Byeong-Woo Park
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 5.  Update on the Treatment of Early-Stage Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Priyanka Sharma
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2018-04-14

6.  Performance of a new system using a one-step nucleic acid amplification assay for detecting lymph node metastases in breast cancer.

Authors:  Kenzo Shimazu; Tomonori Tanei; Yasuhiro Tamaki; Toshiaki Saeki; Akihiko Osaki; Takahiro Hasebe; Yasuhiko Tomita; Motonari Daito; Mayuko Kobayashi; Shinzaburo Noguchi
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 3.064

7.  Impact of New Technology Adoption on Breast Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Christoph I Lee; Janie M Lee
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2018-12-11       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  First Prospective Multicenter Italian Study on the Impact of the 21-Gene Recurrence Score in Adjuvant Clinical Decisions for Patients with ER Positive/HER2 Negative Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Maria Vittoria Dieci; Valentina Guarneri; Tommaso Giarratano; Marta Mion; Giampaolo Tortora; Costanza De Rossi; Stefania Gori; Cristina Oliani; Laura Merlini; Felice Pasini; Giorgio Bonciarelli; Gaia Griguolo; Enrico Orvieto; Silvia Michieletto; Tania Saibene; Paola Del Bianco; Gian Luca De Salvo; PierFranco Conte
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2017-11-13

9.  Surgery of the Primary Tumor Offers Survival Benefits of Breast Cancer with Synchronous Ipsilateral Supraclavicular Lymph Node Metastasis.

Authors:  Qi-Tong Chen; Li-Yun Zeng; Deng-Jie Ouyang; Piao Zhao; Qiong-Yan Zou; Lei Pei; Na Luo; Wen-Jun Yi
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Impact of Genomic Assay Testing and Clinical Factors on Chemotherapy Use After Implementation of Standardized Testing Criteria.

Authors:  Kelsey H Natsuhara; Katya Losk; Tari A King; Nancy U Lin; Kristen Camuso; Mehra Golshan; Stephen Pochebit; Jane E Brock; Craig A Bunnell; Rachel A Freedman
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2018-08-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.