Literature DB >> 31930530

In situ CRISPR-Cas9 base editing for the development of genetically engineered mouse models of breast cancer.

Stefano Annunziato1,2, Catrin Lutz1,2, Linda Henneman3, Jinhyuk Bhin1,2,4, Kim Wong5, Bjørn Siteur6, Bas van Gerwen6, Renske de Korte-Grimmerink6, Maria Paz Zafra7, Emma M Schatoff7,8, Anne Paulien Drenth1,2, Eline van der Burg1,2, Timo Eijkman1,2, Siddhartha Mukherjee1,2, Katharina Boroviak5, Lodewyk Fa Wessels2,4, Marieke van de Ven6, Ivo J Huijbers3, David J Adams5, Lukas E Dow7,9, Jos Jonkers1,2.   

Abstract

Genetically engineered mouse models (GEMMs) of cancer have proven to be of great value for basic and translational research. Although CRISPR-based gene disruption offers a fast-track approach for perturbing gene function and circumvents certain limitations of standard GEMM development, it does not provide a flexible platform for recapitulating clinically relevant missense mutations in vivo. To this end, we generated knock-in mice with Cre-conditional expression of a cytidine base editor and tested their utility for precise somatic engineering of missense mutations in key cancer drivers. Upon intraductal delivery of sgRNA-encoding vectors, we could install point mutations with high efficiency in one or multiple endogenous genes in situ and assess the effect of defined allelic variants on mammary tumorigenesis. While the system also produces bystander insertions and deletions that can stochastically be selected for when targeting a tumor suppressor gene, we could effectively recapitulate oncogenic nonsense mutations. We successfully applied this system in a model of triple-negative breast cancer, providing the proof of concept for extending this flexible somatic base editing platform to other tissues and tumor types.
© 2020 The Authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CRISPR-Cas9; base editing; breast cancer; genetically engineered mouse models; intraductal injections

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31930530      PMCID: PMC7049816          DOI: 10.15252/embj.2019102169

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EMBO J        ISSN: 0261-4189            Impact factor:   11.598


  47 in total

1.  CRISPR knockout screening outperforms shRNA and CRISPRi in identifying essential genes.

Authors:  Bastiaan Evers; Katarzyna Jastrzebski; Jeroen P M Heijmans; Wipawadee Grernrum; Roderick L Beijersbergen; Rene Bernards
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 54.908

2.  Genomic and Transcriptomic Landscape of Triple-Negative Breast Cancers: Subtypes and Treatment Strategies.

Authors:  Yi-Zhou Jiang; Ding Ma; Chen Suo; Jinxiu Shi; Mengzhu Xue; Xin Hu; Yi Xiao; Ke-Da Yu; Yi-Rong Liu; Ying Yu; Yuanting Zheng; Xiangnan Li; Chenhui Zhang; Pengchen Hu; Jing Zhang; Qi Hua; Jiyang Zhang; Wanwan Hou; Luyao Ren; Ding Bao; Bingying Li; Jingcheng Yang; Ling Yao; Wen-Jia Zuo; Shen Zhao; Yue Gong; Yi-Xing Ren; Ya-Xin Zhao; Yun-Song Yang; Zhenmin Niu; Zhi-Gang Cao; Daniel G Stover; Claire Verschraegen; Virginia Kaklamani; Anneleen Daemen; John R Benson; Kazuaki Takabe; Fan Bai; Da-Qiang Li; Peng Wang; Leming Shi; Wei Huang; Zhi-Ming Shao
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 31.743

3.  Directed evolution using dCas9-targeted somatic hypermutation in mammalian cells.

Authors:  Gaelen T Hess; Laure Frésard; Kyuho Han; Cameron H Lee; Amy Li; Karlene A Cimprich; Stephen B Montgomery; Michael C Bassik
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2016-10-31       Impact factor: 28.547

4.  In situ CRISPR-Cas9 base editing for the development of genetically engineered mouse models of breast cancer.

Authors:  Stefano Annunziato; Catrin Lutz; Linda Henneman; Jinhyuk Bhin; Kim Wong; Bjørn Siteur; Bas van Gerwen; Renske de Korte-Grimmerink; Maria Paz Zafra; Emma M Schatoff; Anne Paulien Drenth; Eline van der Burg; Timo Eijkman; Siddhartha Mukherjee; Katharina Boroviak; Lodewyk Fa Wessels; Marieke van de Ven; Ivo J Huijbers; David J Adams; Lukas E Dow; Jos Jonkers
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2020-01-13       Impact factor: 11.598

5.  Cytosine base editor generates substantial off-target single-nucleotide variants in mouse embryos.

Authors:  Erwei Zuo; Yidi Sun; Wu Wei; Tanglong Yuan; Wenqin Ying; Hao Sun; Liyun Yuan; Lars M Steinmetz; Yixue Li; Hui Yang
Journal:  Science       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  A preclinical mouse model of invasive lobular breast cancer metastasis.

Authors:  Chris W Doornebal; Sjoerd Klarenbeek; Tanya M Braumuller; Christiaan N Klijn; Metamia Ciampricotti; Cheei-Sing Hau; Markus W Hollmann; Jos Jonkers; Karin E de Visser
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  The Molecular Signatures Database (MSigDB) hallmark gene set collection.

Authors:  Arthur Liberzon; Chet Birger; Helga Thorvaldsdóttir; Mahmoud Ghandi; Jill P Mesirov; Pablo Tamayo
Journal:  Cell Syst       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 10.304

8.  Improved vectors and genome-wide libraries for CRISPR screening.

Authors:  Neville E Sanjana; Ophir Shalem; Feng Zhang
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 28.547

9.  Improved base excision repair inhibition and bacteriophage Mu Gam protein yields C:G-to-T:A base editors with higher efficiency and product purity.

Authors:  Alexis C Komor; Kevin T Zhao; Michael S Packer; Nicole M Gaudelli; Amanda L Waterbury; Luke W Koblan; Y Bill Kim; Ahmed H Badran; David R Liu
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 14.136

10.  Evolved Cas9 variants with broad PAM compatibility and high DNA specificity.

Authors:  Johnny H Hu; Shannon M Miller; Maarten H Geurts; Weixin Tang; Liwei Chen; Ning Sun; Christina M Zeina; Xue Gao; Holly A Rees; Zhi Lin; David R Liu
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  14 in total

Review 1.  Proteinaceous Hydrogels for Bioengineering Advanced 3D Tumor Models.

Authors:  Barbara Blanco-Fernandez; Vítor M Gaspar; Elisabeth Engel; João F Mano
Journal:  Adv Sci (Weinh)       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 16.806

2.  In situ CRISPR-Cas9 base editing for the development of genetically engineered mouse models of breast cancer.

Authors:  Stefano Annunziato; Catrin Lutz; Linda Henneman; Jinhyuk Bhin; Kim Wong; Bjørn Siteur; Bas van Gerwen; Renske de Korte-Grimmerink; Maria Paz Zafra; Emma M Schatoff; Anne Paulien Drenth; Eline van der Burg; Timo Eijkman; Siddhartha Mukherjee; Katharina Boroviak; Lodewyk Fa Wessels; Marieke van de Ven; Ivo J Huijbers; David J Adams; Lukas E Dow; Jos Jonkers
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2020-01-13       Impact factor: 11.598

Review 3.  Breast Cancer: A Molecularly Heterogenous Disease Needing Subtype-Specific Treatments.

Authors:  Ugo Testa; Germana Castelli; Elvira Pelosi
Journal:  Med Sci (Basel)       Date:  2020-03-23

Review 4.  Genome-editing approaches and applications: a brief review on CRISPR technology and its role in cancer.

Authors:  Narmadhaa Siva; Sonal Gupta; Ayam Gupta; Jayendra Nath Shukla; Babita Malik; Nidhi Shukla
Journal:  3 Biotech       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 2.406

Review 5.  SEMMs: Somatically Engineered Mouse Models. A New Tool for In Vivo Disease Modeling for Basic and Translational Research.

Authors:  Anthony Lima; Danilo Maddalo
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 6.  CRISPR-based genome editing through the lens of DNA repair.

Authors:  Tarun S Nambiar; Lou Baudrier; Pierre Billon; Alberto Ciccia
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 17.970

Review 7.  CRISPR base editing applications for identifying cancer-driving mutations.

Authors:  Martin Pal; Marco J Herold
Journal:  Biochem Soc Trans       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 5.407

Review 8.  Review of applications of CRISPR-Cas9 gene-editing technology in cancer research.

Authors:  Ziyi Zhao; Chenxi Li; Fei Tong; Jingkuang Deng; Guofu Huang; Yi Sang
Journal:  Biol Proced Online       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 3.244

Review 9.  Cancer models in preclinical research: A chronicle review of advancement in effective cancer research.

Authors:  Humna Sajjad; Saiqa Imtiaz; Tayyaba Noor; Yusra Hasan Siddiqui; Anila Sajjad; Muhammad Zia
Journal:  Animal Model Exp Med       Date:  2021-03-29

10.  GO: a functional reporter system to identify and enrich base editing activity.

Authors:  Alyna Katti; Miguel Foronda; Jill Zimmerman; Bianca Diaz; Maria Paz Zafra; Sukanya Goswami; Lukas E Dow
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2020-04-06       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.