| Literature DB >> 27111720 |
Bastiaan Evers1, Katarzyna Jastrzebski1, Jeroen P M Heijmans1, Wipawadee Grernrum1, Roderick L Beijersbergen1, Rene Bernards1.
Abstract
High-throughput genetic screens have become essential tools for studying a wide variety of biological processes. Here we experimentally compare systems based on clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated protein 9 (Cas9) or its transcriptionally repressive variant, CRISPR-interference (CRISPRi), with a traditional short hairpin RNA (shRNA)-based system for performing lethality screens. We find that the CRISPR technology performed best, with low noise, minimal off-target effects and consistent activity across reagents.Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27111720 DOI: 10.1038/nbt.3536
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Biotechnol ISSN: 1087-0156 Impact factor: 54.908