Literature DB >> 3192563

The Oxford Knee for unicompartmental osteoarthritis. The first 103 cases.

J W Goodfellow1, C J Kershaw, M K Benson, J J O'Connor.   

Abstract

The Oxford Knee, a resurfacing prosthesis with a meniscal bearing, can be used for either bicompartmental or unicompartmental arthritis. The first 103 unicompartmental cases are presented at a mean time since operation of 36 months (range 21 to 56 months). In those cases with surviving arthroplasties, pain was relieved in 96%. The full range of pre-operative flexion was maintained and flexion deformity was improved from a mean of 6.7 to 5.4 degrees. Stability and alignment were restored to normal in nearly all the knees. Absence of the anterior cruciate ligament was associated with a significantly greater incidence of failure. Six failures occurred in 37 knees lacking a normal anterior cruciate ligament (16.2%); three occurred in 63 knees with a normal anterior cruciate ligament (4.8%) (p less than 0.02). Criteria for the future selection of patients have been deduced from our experience. The operation is recommended for knees with severe unicompartmental osteoarthritis in which all the ligaments are still intact.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3192563

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br        ISSN: 0301-620X


  66 in total

Review 1.  Management of osteoarthritis of the knee.

Authors:  Andrew Price; Robin Allum
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  Survival analysis and functional outcome of the Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement up to 11 years follow up at a District General Hospital.

Authors:  M Edmondson; A Atrey; D East; N Ellens; K Miles; R Goddard; H Apthorp; A Butler-Manuel
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2015-05-18

3.  [AMC unicondylar prosthesis].

Authors:  G Saxler; D Temmen; G Bontemps
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  [Medial unicompartmental knee replacement using the "Oxford Uni" meniscal bearing knee].

Authors:  P R Aldinger; M Clarius; D W Murray; J W Goodfellow; S J Breusch
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 1.087

5.  [Pre- and postoperative radioligical evaluation of knee joint endoprothesis. Orthopedist's view].

Authors:  F Mazoochian; C Glaser; A Fottner; S M Hauptmann; M Triantafyllou; C von Schulze Pellengahr; M F Reiser; V Jansson
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 0.635

6.  [Minimally invasive implantation in unicondylar arthroplasty].

Authors:  R Hube; M Keim
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 7.  Causes of revision following Oxford phase 3 unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Seung-Ju Kim; Ricardo Postigo; Sowon Koo; Jong Hun Kim
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-09-01       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Assessment of radiolucent lines in patients with lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty and the relationship between these lines and the outcome.

Authors:  Long Xue; Huaming Xue; Tao Wen; Mengying Guan; Tao Yang; Tong Ma; Yihui Tu
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2021-06-26       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  ACL reconstruction with unicondylar replacement in knee with functional instability and osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Srikrishna R S R Krishnan; Ray Randle
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2009-12-17       Impact factor: 2.359

10.  Analysis of revision procedures for failed unicondylar knee replacement.

Authors:  K O Oduwole; M K Sayana; F Onayemi; T McCarthy; J O'Byrne
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 1.568

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.