Literature DB >> 26719619

Survival analysis and functional outcome of the Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement up to 11 years follow up at a District General Hospital.

M Edmondson1, A Atrey1, D East1, N Ellens1, K Miles1, R Goddard1, H Apthorp1, A Butler-Manuel1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There have been several large originator studies reporting excellent results with this prosthesis but far fewer large independent studies. We present, to our knowledge, the largest independent series documenting excellent survivorship rates and good functional outcomes at a mean follow up of 5.5 years post implantation of the Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement.
METHODS: Our prospective study looks at the survivorship and the functional outcome of 364 Oxford UKRs performed in a district general hospital at a mean follow up of 5.5 years (range 5-11 years). Post operatively knees were assessed in a research clinic using the Oxford knees score (as well as the American Knee Society Score and the Hospital for Special Surgery Score). Maximal flexion was also measured.
RESULTS: There were 26 revisions of 364 knees giving a survivorship, with revision as the end point, of 93% at a mean of 5.5 years post op (range 5-11 years). We achieved an Oxford score of 37.5, a mean AKSS of 161 (divided as American knee functional score 75.75/American knee objective score 85.4 (excellent)). The mean HSS score was 84.5. We achieved 'Excellent' Oxford knee scores in 137 knees (48%), 'Good' in 75 (26%), 'Moderate' in 51 (17%) and 'Poor' in only 27 (9%) of knees. Mean improvement in functional scores were: Oxford score (14.4), AKSS (71) and HSS (26.3). Mean maximal flexion was 123° range (110-140).
CONCLUSIONS: We have confirmed that good medium to long-term function and survival can be obtained following Oxford medial knee replacement for treating anteromedial osteoarthritis, in our large independent series.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Functional outcome; Oxford unicompartmental knee; Survival

Year:  2015        PMID: 26719619      PMCID: PMC4674499          DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2013.12.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop        ISSN: 0972-978X


  30 in total

1.  Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. A survival analysis of an independent series.

Authors:  U C Svärd; A J Price
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2001-03

2.  Analysis of first forty Oxford medial unicompartmental knee replacement from a small district hospital in UK.

Authors:  Graham W Keys; Zain Ul-Abiddin; Eugene M Toh
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Minimally invasive Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. A note of caution!

Authors:  K L Luscombe; J Lim; P W Jones; S H White
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2006-08-01       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  The short-term results of 3 common UKA implants during different periods in Sweden.

Authors:  Otto Robertsson; Lars Lidgren
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  Analysis of the failure of 122 polyethylene inserts from uncemented tibial knee components.

Authors:  J P Collier; M B Mayor; J L McNamara; V A Surprenant; R E Jensen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  The Oxford phase III unicompartmental knee replacement in patients less than 60 years of age.

Authors:  Nanne P Kort; Jos J A M van Raay; Jim J van Horn
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2006-10-07       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Retrieval analysis of total knee prostheses: a method and its application to 48 total condylar prostheses.

Authors:  R W Hood; T M Wright; A H Burstein
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1983-09

8.  Unicompartmental or total knee arthroplasty?: Results from a matched study.

Authors:  Anish K Amin; James T Patton; Robert E Cook; Mark Gaston; Ivan J Brenkel
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Oxford medial unicompartmental arthroplasty for focal spontaneous osteonecrosis of the knee.

Authors:  Andrew J Langdown; Hemant Pandit; Andrew J Price; Christopher A F Dodd; David W Murray; Ulf C G Svärd; Christopher L M H Gibbons
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.717

10.  Total knee replacement performed with either a mini-midvastus or a standard approach: a prospective randomised clinical and radiological trial.

Authors:  Th Karachalios; D Giotikas; N Roidis; L Poultsides; K Bargiotas; K N Malizos
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2008-05
View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Unicompartmental knee replacement - Current perspectives.

Authors:  Stefano Campi; Saket Tibrewal; Rory Cuthbert; Sheo B Tibrewal
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2017-11-28

2.  Revision indications for medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a systematic review.

Authors:  Mei Lin Tay; Sue R McGlashan; A Paul Monk; Simon W Young
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 3.  Long-term outcomes of over 8,000 medial Oxford Phase 3 Unicompartmental Knees-a systematic review.

Authors:  Hasan R Mohammad; Louise Strickland; Thomas W Hamilton; David W Murray
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 3.717

4.  The Anterior Impingement After Mobile-Bearing Unicomparimental Knee Arthroplasty-A Neglected Problem. A Clinical Report of 14 Cases.

Authors:  Timon Röttinger; Leonard Lisitano; Andreas Wiedl; Edgar Mayr; Heinz Röttinger
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2022-08-19

5.  TRENDS IN UNICOMPARTMENTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY.

Authors:  Ahmet Nadir Aydemir; Mehmet Yucens
Journal:  Acta Ortop Bras       Date:  2020 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 0.513

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.