Literature DB >> 19953338

Analysis of revision procedures for failed unicondylar knee replacement.

K O Oduwole1, M K Sayana, F Onayemi, T McCarthy, J O'Byrne.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Unicondylar knee arthroplasty (UKA) is argued to be a conservative procedure which permits a later total knee arthroplasty (TKA) should it be required. AIM: The aims of the study were to assess the modes of early failure of UKA and see whether the conversion to TKA improved the functional scores, range of motion, pain and patient satisfaction.
METHOD: Fourteen revision procedures performed after failed unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) were evaluated. Patient demographics, modes of failure and technical issues relating to revision were noted. Post-operative functional outcome was assessed using WOMAC osteoarthritis index and SF-36 scores.
RESULTS: Thirteen percent of primary UKA performed were revised to TKA. Eighty-six percent of the revisions were required within the first 12 months. Revision procedure was complex in nearly half of the cases. There was no significant improvement in post-operative functional scores.
CONCLUSION: Results of conversion of UKA to TKA are less satisfactory than primary TKA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19953338     DOI: 10.1007/s11845-009-0454-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ir J Med Sci        ISSN: 0021-1265            Impact factor:   1.568


  19 in total

1.  Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for medial gonarthrosis: 5 to 9 years follow-up evaluation of 77 knees.

Authors:  Y Hasegawa; Y Ooishi; T Shimizu; H Sugiura; S Takahashi; H Ito; H Iwata
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 3.067

2.  Revision of failed unicondylar unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  W P Barrett; R D Scott
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Unicompartmental replacement and high tibial osteotomy for osteoarthritis of the knee. A comparative study after 5-10 years' follow-up.

Authors:  N S Broughton; J H Newman; R A Baily
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1986-05

4.  The Oxford Knee for unicompartmental osteoarthritis. The first 103 cases.

Authors:  J W Goodfellow; C J Kershaw; M K Benson; J J O'Connor
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1988-11

5.  Revision total knee arthroplasty after failed unicompartmental knee arthroplasty or high tibial osteotomy.

Authors:  T Gill; E H Schemitsch; G W Brick; T S Thornhill
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  MIS unicondylar knee arthroplasty: surgical approach and early results.

Authors:  Mark W Gesell; Alfred J Tria
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Unicondylar knee arthroplasty: a cementless perspective.

Authors:  M E Forsythe; R E Englund; R K Leighton
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.089

8.  A comparison of tricompartmental and unicompartmental arthroplasty for the treatment of gonarthrosis.

Authors:  B T Rougraff; D A Heck; A E Gibson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Long-term results of the total condylar knee arthroplasty. A 15-year survivorship study.

Authors:  C S Ranawat; W F Flynn; S Saddler; K K Hansraj; M J Maynard
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Rapid polyethylene failure of unicondylar tibial components sterilized with gamma irradiation in air and implanted after a long shelf life.

Authors:  Thomas F McGovern; Deborah J Ammeen; John P Collier; Barbara H Currier; Gerard A Engh
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  High tibial osteotomy versus unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for medial compartment arthrosis of the knee: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Federico Dettoni; Davide Edoardo Bonasia; Filippo Castoldi; Matteo Bruzzone; Davide Blonna; Roberto Rossi
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2010

2.  [Medial unicondylar knee replacement].

Authors:  O Lorbach; D Pape; P Mosser; D Kohn; K Anagnostakos
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Revision to TKA: Are Tibial Stems and Augments Associated With Improved Survivorship?

Authors:  Peter L Lewis; David C Davidson; Stephen E Graves; Richard N de Steiger; William Donnelly; Alana Cuthbert
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Revision of partial knee to total knee arthroplasty with use of patient-specific instruments results in acceptable femoral rotation.

Authors:  Martijn G M Schotanus; Elke Thijs; B Boonen; B Kerens; B Jong; Nanne P Kort
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  [The 2-year follow-up results of a patient-specific interpositional knee implant].

Authors:  F X Köck; J Beckmann; P Lechler; J Götz; J Schaumburger; J Grifka
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 6.  Medial Unicompartmental Osteoarthritis (MUO) of the Knee: Unicompartmental Knee Replacement (UKR) or Total Knee Replacement (TKR).

Authors:  E Carlos Rodriguez-Merchan
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2014-09-15

7.  Comparison of the clinical outcomes of revision of failed UKAs to TKAs with primary TKAs: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Wei Zuo; Jinhui Ma; Wanshou Guo; Qidong Zhang; Weiguo Wang; Zhaohui Liu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 1.817

8.  Revision of unicondylar to total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review.

Authors:  Nashat A Siddiqui; Zafar M Ahmad
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2012-07-27

9.  Patient-specific guide for revision of medial unicondylar knee arthroplasty to total knee arthroplasty: beneficial first results of a new operating technique performed on 10 patients.

Authors:  Bart Kerens; Bert Boonen; Martijn Schotanus; Nanne Kort
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 3.717

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.