Literature DB >> 3192094

Variability in digital analysis of optic disc topography.

R Varma1, W C Steinmann, G L Spaeth, R P Wilson.   

Abstract

We determined the magnitude of variability in optic disc topographical parameters on digital analysis of the optic disc using the IS 2000. The variability introduced by the system, the observer, the observer and patient, and by clinically different types of discs was assessed in the measurement of the vertical cup-to-disc ratio, horizontal cup-to-disc ratio, cup area-to-disc area, cup volume, neuroretinal rim area, and neuroretinal rim area-to-disc area. The system itself accounted for no variability. The variability introduced by one observer for the parameters ranged from 1% to 7%, and by one observer and patient from 1% to 28%. The variation among five observers ranged from 1% to 55%. Direct image acquisition (using video cameras) gave results that were no different from those obtained by digitizing the slides. Contrast-enhancement techniques did not decrease observer variability. A change in the flash intensity level at which optic disc images were acquired from 94.5 to 15.0 Watt-seconds introduced a variability of 3% to 21%. These results are less variable than those obtained on clinical observation and comparable to those of the Rodenstock image analyzer in evaluating these aspects of optic disc topography.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3192094     DOI: 10.1007/bf02170004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0721-832X            Impact factor:   3.117


  8 in total

1.  A METHOD OF RECORDING DISC ALTERATIONS AND A STUDY OF THE GROWTH OF NORMAL AND ABNORMAL DISC CUPS.

Authors:  R Pickard
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1923-02       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Variability of expert observers in evaluating the optic disc.

Authors:  P R Lichter
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  1976

3.  Reproducibility of optic disc measurements with computerized analysis of stereoscopic video images.

Authors:  J Caprioli; U Klingbeil; M Sears; B Pope
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1986-07

4.  Digital photogrammetry of the optic nervehead.

Authors:  M S Kottler; A R Rosenthal; D G Falconer
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol       Date:  1974-02

Review 5.  Stereotechnology in medicine.

Authors:  G Crock
Journal:  Trans Ophthalmol Soc U K       Date:  1970

6.  Resolution at low contrast with a fundus camera. Comparison of various photographic films.

Authors:  L Frisén
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol       Date:  1973-11

7.  The use of photogrammetry in evaluating the cup of the optic nervehead for a study in chronic simple glaucoma.

Authors:  N E Saheb; S M Drance; A Nelson
Journal:  Can J Ophthalmol       Date:  1972-10       Impact factor: 1.882

8.  Reliability of optic disk topographic measurements recorded with a video-ophthalmograph.

Authors:  F S Mikelberg; G R Douglas; M Schulzer; T N Cornsweet; K Wijsman
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1984-07-15       Impact factor: 5.258

  8 in total
  12 in total

1.  Comparison between laser scanning tomography and computerised image analysis of the optic disc.

Authors:  A Azuara-Blanco; G L Spaeth; J Nicholl; I M Lanzl; J J Augsburger
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Exfoliation syndrome as a risk factor for optic disc changes in nonglaucomatous eyes.

Authors:  P Puska; C Raitta
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Topographic changes in the optic disc in eyes with cotton-wool spots and primary open-angle glaucoma.

Authors:  E Chihara; Y Honda
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Intraimage reproducibility of measurements in the macular area using a computerized system.

Authors:  M Iester; B Mochi; S Lai; F Rathschuler; M Rolando; G Ciurlo
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.031

5.  Reproducibility of topographic measures of the glaucomatous optic nerve head.

Authors:  O Geyer; A Michaeli-Cohen; D M Silver; D Versano; M Neudorfer; R Dzhanov; M Lazar
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 4.638

6.  Peripapillary atrophy in unilateral capsular glaucoma.

Authors:  P Puska; C Raitta
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 3.117

7.  Measurement variability in digital analysis of optic discs.

Authors:  M Rolando; M Iester; P Campagna; L Borgia; C Traverso; G Calabria
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.379

8.  Clinical evaluation of the optic nerve in glaucoma.

Authors:  J Caprioli
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  1994

9.  Inter- and intraobserver variation in the analysis of optic disc images: comparison of the Heidelberg retina tomograph and computer assisted planimetry.

Authors:  D F Garway-Heath; D Poinoosawmy; G Wollstein; A Viswanathan; D Kamal; L Fontana; R A Hitchings
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.638

10.  Interocular asymmetry of optic disc size and its relevance to visual field loss in normal-tension glaucoma.

Authors:  G Tomita; K Nyman; C Raitta; M Kawamura
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 3.117

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.