Literature DB >> 9587833

Intraimage reproducibility of measurements in the macular area using a computerized system.

M Iester1, B Mochi, S Lai, F Rathschuler, M Rolando, G Ciurlo.   

Abstract

An accurate analysis of the morphological changes which take place during pathological processes of the posterior pole is important for a correct diagnosis and therapeutic approach. The purpose of the study was to determine the intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility of the Image-net system 100 (Topcon, Japan) to take measurements on the retina. The program 'Linear/Areal Measurement functions' of Image-net system 100 which is an image digitalization technique, was tested. Twelve patients were consecutively selected from the patients of the Retina Center of the Department of Ophthalmology, University of Genoa. Three images of each eye were taken from each subject and only the best image was used in this study. The intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility of both the distance between two pre-set points (linear measurement), and the perimeter and area of preselected retinal zones were calculated. The repeatability (or intraobserver reproducibility) of the linear sizes was measured by the coefficient of variation and ranged from 0.32% to 7.38%, while the interobserver reproducibility ranged from 0.46% to 5.22%. The repeatability and reproducibility of the perimeters ranged from 0.72% to 9.63% and from 0.6% to 5.7%, respectively, while the repeatability and reproducibility of the areas ranged from 0.72% to 9.63% and from 0.6% to 5.7%, respectively. Although the results were quite good, the quality of the image of the fundus and the number of observers influenced the coefficient of variation; furthermore, the anatomy of the areas to be measured and the computer 'mouse' could increase the value of the coefficient of variation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9587833     DOI: 10.1023/a:1026490416530

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0165-5701            Impact factor:   2.031


  9 in total

1.  Variability of expert observers in evaluating the optic disc.

Authors:  P R Lichter
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  1976

2.  Use of directly acquired digital fundus and fluorescein angiographic images in the diagnosis of retinal disease.

Authors:  T R Friberg; P G Rehkopf; J W Warnicki; A W Eller
Journal:  Retina       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 4.256

3.  Reproducibility of optic disc measurements with computerized analysis of stereoscopic video images.

Authors:  J Caprioli; U Klingbeil; M Sears; B Pope
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1986-07

4.  Variability in digital analysis of optic disc topography.

Authors:  R Varma; W C Steinmann; G L Spaeth; R P Wilson
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Study of the correlation between average values of optic disc parameters and their measurement variability using stereovideographic digital analysis.

Authors:  M Iester; C E Traverso; M Rolando; G Calabria; M Zingirian
Journal:  Ophthalmologica       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.250

6.  Measurement variability in digital analysis of optic discs.

Authors:  M Rolando; M Iester; P Campagna; L Borgia; C Traverso; G Calabria
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.379

7.  Reliability of optic disk topographic measurements recorded with a video-ophthalmograph.

Authors:  F S Mikelberg; G R Douglas; M Schulzer; T N Cornsweet; K Wijsman
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1984-07-15       Impact factor: 5.258

8.  Central serous chorioretinopathy: an analysis of the clinical morphology using image-processing techniques.

Authors:  T R Friberg; J Campagna
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.117

9.  Reproducibility of photogrammetric optic disc cup measurements.

Authors:  T Takamoto; B Schwartz
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 4.799

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.