Literature DB >> 10365036

Comparison between laser scanning tomography and computerised image analysis of the optic disc.

A Azuara-Blanco1, G L Spaeth, J Nicholl, I M Lanzl, J J Augsburger.   

Abstract

AIMS: To study the interchangeability of the measurements of the optic disc topography obtained by one computerised image analyser and one confocal laser tomographic scanner.
METHODS: One eye of 28 patients with glaucoma or glaucoma suspects was studied. All cases had simultaneous stereoscopic disc photographs taken with the fundus camera Topcon TRC-SS and optic disc examination with the Heidelberg retina tomograph (HRT) during the same visit. The optic disc photographs were digitised and analysed with the Topcon ImageNet (TI) system. Three variables of the optic disc topography provided by the TI and the HRT were compared--cup volume (CV), rim area (RA), and cup area to disc area ratio (CA/DA).
RESULTS: The mean values of CV and RA provided by the TI (0.52 (SD 0.32) mm3 and 1.58 (0.39) mm2, respectively) were greater (p < 0.01) than the mean values of CV and RA determined by the HRT (0.32 (0.25) mm3, and 1.33 (0.47) mm2, respectively). The mean value of CA/DA provided by the TI (0.42 (0.14)) and the HRT (0.42 (0.18)) was similar (p = 0.93). Correlation coefficients between measurements obtained by the two methods ranged from 0.53 to 0.73.
CONCLUSION: There was a significant discrepancy in the measurements of rim area and cup volume of the optic disc obtained by a computerised image analyser and a laser scanning tomograph.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10365036      PMCID: PMC1722972          DOI: 10.1136/bjo.83.3.295

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0007-1161            Impact factor:   4.638


  20 in total

1.  Correction of optic disc measurements on fundus photographs.

Authors:  B Bengtsson; C E Krakau
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Reproducibility of topographic measurements of the normal and glaucomatous optic nerve head with the laser tomographic scanner.

Authors:  A W Dreher; P C Tso; R N Weinreb
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1991-02-15       Impact factor: 5.258

3.  A comparative evaluation of three methods of analyzing optic disc topography.

Authors:  R Varma; G R Douglas; W C Steinmann; K Wijsman; D Mawson; G L Spaeth
Journal:  Ophthalmic Surg       Date:  1989-11

4.  Variability of depth measurements of the optic nerve head and peripapillary retina with computerized image analysis.

Authors:  L Dandona; H A Quigley; H D Jampel
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1989-12

5.  Comparison of clinician judgment with digitized image analysis in the detection of induced optic disk change in monkey eyes.

Authors:  C F Burgoyne; H A Quigley; R Varma
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 5.258

6.  Confocal laser scanning ophthalmoscope. Reproducibility of optic nerve head topographic measurements with the confocal laser scanning ophthalmoscope.

Authors:  G A Cioffi; A L Robin; R D Eastman; H F Perell; F A Sarfarazi; S E Kelman
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 12.079

7.  Comparison between tomographic scanning evaluation and photographic measurement of the neuroretinal rim.

Authors:  A Dichtl; J B Jonas; C Y Mardin
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 5.258

8.  Laser scanning tomography and stereophotogrammetry in three-dimensional optic disc analysis.

Authors:  R O Burk; K Rohrschneider; T Takamoto; H E Völcker; B Schwartz
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 3.117

9.  Effect of repetitive imaging on topographic measurements of the optic nerve head.

Authors:  R N Weinreb; M Lusky; D U Bartsch; D Morsman
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1993-05

10.  Race-, age-, gender-, and refractive error-related differences in the normal optic disc.

Authors:  R Varma; J M Tielsch; H A Quigley; S C Hilton; J Katz; G L Spaeth; A Sommer
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1994-08
View more
  4 in total

1.  Comparison of optic nerve head assessment with a digital stereoscopic camera (discam), scanning laser ophthalmoscopy, and stereophotography.

Authors:  Anthony J Correnti; Gadi Wollstein; Lori Lyn Price; Joel S Schuman
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 12.079

Review 2.  Test-retest variability in structural parameters measured with glaucoma imaging devices.

Authors:  Makoto Araie
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-11-09       Impact factor: 2.447

3.  A genome-wide association study of optic disc parameters.

Authors:  Wishal D Ramdas; Leonieke M E van Koolwijk; M Kamran Ikram; Nomdo M Jansonius; Paulus T V M de Jong; Arthur A B Bergen; Aaron Isaacs; Najaf Amin; Yurii S Aulchenko; Roger C W Wolfs; Albert Hofman; Fernando Rivadeneira; Ben A Oostra; Andre G Uitterlinden; Pirro Hysi; Christopher J Hammond; Hans G Lemij; Johannes R Vingerling; Caroline C W Klaver; Cornelia M van Duijn
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 5.917

4.  [Screening for diabetic retinopathy and optic disc topography with the "retinal thickness analyzer" (RTA)].

Authors:  A S Neubauer; C Chryssafis; M Thiel; S Priglinger; U Welge-Lüssen; A Kampik
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 1.059

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.