Literature DB >> 31915073

Oral submucous fibrosis: a contemporary narrative review with a proposed inter-professional approach for an early diagnosis and clinical management.

Naman R Rao1, Alessandro Villa2,3, Chandramani B More4, Ruwan D Jayasinghe5, Alexander Ross Kerr6, Newell W Johnson7.   

Abstract

Oral Submucous fibrosis (OSMF) has traditionally been described as "a chronic, insidious, scarring disease of the oral cavity, often with involvement of the pharynx and the upper esophagus". Millions of individuals are affected, especially in South and South East Asian countries. The main risk factor is areca nut chewing. Due to its high morbidity and high malignant transformation rate, constant efforts have been made to develop effective management. Despite this, there have been no significant improvements in prognosis for decades. This expert opinion paper updates the literature and provides a critique of diagnostic and therapeutic pitfalls common in developing countries and of deficiencies in management. An inter-professional model is proposed to avoid these pitfalls and to reduce these deficiencies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Areca nut; Global epidemiology; Management; Oral submucous fibrosis

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31915073      PMCID: PMC6951010          DOI: 10.1186/s40463-020-0399-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 1916-0208


Introduction

Oral Submucous Fibrosis (OSMF) is a potentially malignant disorder which was described by Schwartz in 1952 as “Atropica idiopathica mucosae oris” and later by Jens J. Pindborg in 1966 as “an insidious, chronic disease that affects any part of the oral cavity and sometimes the pharynx [1]. Although occasionally preceded by, or associated with, the formation of vesicles, it is always associated with a juxtaepithelial inflammatory reaction followed by fibroelastic change of the lamina propria and epithelial atrophy that leads to stiffness of the oral mucosa and causes trismus and an inability to eat” [1]. OSMF is also characterized by reduced movement and depapillation of the tongue, blanching and leathery texture of the oral mucosa, progressive reduction of mouth opening, and shrunken uvula [2-4]. Other terms used to describe OSMF include idiopathic scleroderma of the mouth, juxtaepithelial fibrosis, idiopathic palatal fibrosis, diffuse oral submucous fibrosis, and sclerosing stomatitis [5-8].

Epidemiology (Table 1) (Fig. 1)

Worldwide, the number of cases of OSMF was estimated to be 2.5 million in 1996 [33]. Although many case finding studies have been conducted, particularly in South and South East Asia, OSMF is not a notifiable disease and no population-based data are available [33]. The prevalence of OSMF in India has been estimated to range from 0.2–2.3% in males and 1.2–4.6% in females, with a broad age range from 11 to 60 years [34-36]. A marked increase in incidence has been observed after the widespread marketing of commercial tobacco and areca nut products, generally known as Gutkha, which is sold in single-use packets [33]. Currently, it is estimated that areca nut is consumed by 10–20% of the World’s population in a wide variety of formulations [37, 38]. The global South Asian diaspora also has a significant problem with cases reported from the United Kingdom, USA, South Africa, and many European countries. Worldwide prevalence studies on Oral Submucous Fibrosis Global and Indian prevalence studies of Oral Submucous Fibrosis Table 1 and Fig. 1 present published estimates of the prevalence of OSMF, which range from 0.1 to 30%, varying by geographical location, sample size, and sampling methodology. There is an urgent need for large well-designed epidemiological surveys to understand the true global and regional burden of OSMF.
Table 1

Worldwide prevalence studies on Oral Submucous Fibrosis

YearAuthorsStudy typeSample sizeCountryCity/districtState/ProvincePrevalence (%)
1965Pindborg J. J. et al. [9]Observational10,000IndiaMumbaiMaharashtra0.50
1965Pindborg J. J. et al. [10]Cross sectional10,000IndiaLucknowUttar Pradesh4.1
1966Pindborg J. J. et al. [11]Observational10,000IndiaBengaluruKarnataka0.18
1966Zachariah et al. [12]Observational5000IndiaThiruvananthapuramKerala1.22
1968Pindborg J. J. et al. [13]Observational50,915IndiaSrikakulamAndra Pradesh0.04
DarbhangaBihar0.07
BhavnagarGujarat0.16
ErnakulumKerala0.36
1970Wahi et al. [14]ObservationalIndiaMainpuriUttar Pradesh0.59
1972Mehta F. S. et al. [15]Survey101,761IndiaPuneMaharashtra0.03
1982Lay K. M. et al. [16]Cross sectional6000MyanmarBilugyunMon0.1
1988Seedat H. A. et al. [17]Cross sectional2400South AfricaDurbanKwaZulu-Natal3.4
1997Tang J.G. et al. [18]Cross sectional11,046ChinaXiangtanHunan3.30
2006Patil P. B. et al. [19]Cross sectional2400IndiaDharwadKarnataka7.8
2007Hazarey V. K. et al. [20]Cross sectional1000IndiaNagpurMaharashtra6.42
2008Mathew A. L. et al. [21]Observational1190IndiaManipalKarnataka2.01
2008Mehrotra R. et al. [22]Retrospective1151IndiaAllahabadUttar Pradesh17.02
2012Sharma R. et al. [23]Cross sectional survey6800IndiaJaipurRajasthan3.39
2012Agarwal A. et al. [24]Observational750IndiaDehradunUttarakhand5.4
2013Bhatnagar P. et al. [25]Survey8866IndiaModinagarUttar Pradesh1.97
2014Burungale S. U. et al. [26]Cross sectional800IndiaJaitala, NagpurMaharashtra2.62
2014Nigam N. K. et al. [27]Observational1000IndiaMoradabadUttar Pradesh6.3
2015Patil S. et al. [28]Observational5100IndiaJodhpurRajasthan30
2016Singh P. et al. [29]Cross sectional survey132IndiaNagpurMaharashtra2.86
2018Tyagi V. N. et al. [30]Cross sectional1167IndiaNashikMaharashtra3.51
2018Yang S. F. et al. [31]Cross sectional23,373,51Republic of ChinaTaiwan16.2
2019More C. B, et al. [32]Cross sectional13,874IndiaVadodaraGujarat7.21
Fig. 1

Global and Indian prevalence studies of Oral Submucous Fibrosis

Major etiology, contributing factors and etiopathogenesis (Tables 2 and 3) (Fig. 2)

Although the etiopathogenesis of this disease is multifactorial, areca nut-chewing in any formulation is considered the main causative agent. (Fig. 2) Contributory risk factors suggested includes chewing of smokeless tobacco, high intake of chilies, toxic levels of copper in foodstuffs and masticatories, vitamin deficiencies, and malnutrition resulting in low levels of serum proteins, anemia and genetic predisposition.
Fig. 2

Etiopathogenesis [44]

Major aetiology of Oral Submucous Fibrosis Contributing risk factors for Oral Submucous Fibrosis Etiopathogenesis [44]

Diagnostic approach

Diagnosis of OSMF is based on clinical signs and symptoms that include burning sensation, pain, and ulceration (Table 4) [4, 46, 47]. Progressive restriction in mouth opening, blanching of the mucosa, depapillation of the tongue, and loss of pigmentation are other classic features (Fig. 3) [46]. Dysphonia and hearing impairment is also observed in advanced cases [48, 49]. Quality of life (QoL) is severely affected, worsening with increasing stage of the disease [50].
Table 4

Intra- and extra- oral manifestations of OSMF at different stages

FeaturesEarly stageModerate stageAdvanced stage
Intra oralStomatitis, excessive salivation, burning sensation, blanching of oral mucosa, blister formation, presence of thin palpable fibrous bands, sparse brown/black pigmentation.Stomatitis, burning sensation, xerostomia, loss of taste sensation, gradual decrease in mouth opening, difficulty in whistling, vesicle formation, petechiae, rigid oral mucosa, difficulty in blowing the cheeks, defective gustatory sensation, blanching of oral mucosa – especially of soft palate, buccal mucosa, labial mucosa, tongue, floor of mouth, and faucial pillars. Presence of thick palpable fibrous bands, shrunken uvula with altered shape (inverted, hockey stick, bud like, deviated).Stomatitis, burning sensation, xerostomia, reduction in mouth opening, restricted tongue movement, loss of taste sensation, Unable to blow the cheeks, defective gustatory sensation, inability to whistle, blanching of oral mucosa: esp. soft palate, buccal mucosa, labial mucosa, tongue, floor of mouth, and faucial pillars. Loss of suppleness of mucosa, mottled or opaque or white marble like appearance of oral mucosa, thick palpable fibrous bands on buccal and labial mucosa, de-papillation of tongue, shrunken uvula with altered shape (inverted, hockey stick, bud like, deviated), involvement of the pharyngeal and esophageal mucosa.
Extra oralNo Significant extra oral features are observed.Prominent masseter muscle, nasal twang, sunken cheeks, thinning of lips, difficulty in deglutition, loss of naso-labial fold, prominent antegonial notch, hoarseness of voice, mild hearing impairment, weight loss.Hypertrophic and stiff masseter muscle, nasal intonation of voice, sunken cheeks, multiple folds on cheeks when attempting wide opening of mouth, thinning of lips, difficulty in deglutition, loss of naso-labial fold, prominent antegonial notch, hoarseness of voice, severe hearing impairment, severe weight loss, hoarseness of voice, difficulty in deglutition, atrophy of facial musculature. In severe cases, radiographically, there is alteration in condylar form and fibrous ankylosis of the temporomandibular joints.
Fig. 3

Clinical expressions of Oral Submucous Fibrosis. Oral Submucous Fibrosis in a 27-year-old male with a history of gutkha chewing. Panel A shows sunken cheeks and prominent malar bone. Panel B shows significant blanching or marble-like appearance of the soft palate and faucial pillars. Note the altered, inverted shape of the uvula. Panels C & D show blanched bands of upper and lower labial mucosae and vestibule, which are stiff and palpable. Panels E, F & G: A 24-year-old female with a history of chewing baked areca nut. Panel E: significant blanching of soft palate and faucial pillars, and shrunken uvula. Panels F & G: thick fibrous bands and brown/black pigmentation on left & right buccal mucosae

Intra- and extra- oral manifestations of OSMF at different stages Clinical expressions of Oral Submucous Fibrosis. Oral Submucous Fibrosis in a 27-year-old male with a history of gutkha chewing. Panel A shows sunken cheeks and prominent malar bone. Panel B shows significant blanching or marble-like appearance of the soft palate and faucial pillars. Note the altered, inverted shape of the uvula. Panels C & D show blanched bands of upper and lower labial mucosae and vestibule, which are stiff and palpable. Panels E, F & G: A 24-year-old female with a history of chewing baked areca nut. Panel E: significant blanching of soft palate and faucial pillars, and shrunken uvula. Panels F & G: thick fibrous bands and brown/black pigmentation on left & right buccal mucosae OSMF progresses over time and management depends on the stage at clinical presentation. In 2012, More et al. proposed a disease progression-based classification (Table 5) which represents the clinical and functional staging of OSMF. This classification has been widely accepted/recommended as the closest fit for Indian population, especially to understand the disease progression/ clinical pattern [3, 35, 51]. In 2017, Passi D. et al. proposed a pathologically updated and treatment management-based classification. This classification chiefly focuses and recommends the treatment management based on the clinical stage of OSMF [52]. Later in 2018, Arakeri G. et al. proposed a three-component classification scheme (TFM) which can essentially be useful for effective communication amongst the care team, categorization of OSMF, recording data and disease prognosis, and treatment management. Additionally, this classification also describes OSMF malignant transformation in detail [53].
Table 5

More et al. 2012 classification of OSMF

Clinical stagingInterpretation
Stage 1 (S1)Stomatitis and/or blanching of oral mucosa.
Stage 2 (S2)Presence of palpable fibrous bands in buccal mucosa and/or oropharynx, with /without stomatitis.
Stage 3 (S3)Presence of palpable fibrous bands in buccal mucosa and/or oropharynx, and in any other parts of oral cavity, with/ without stomatitis.
Stage 4 (S4)Any one of the above stages along with other potentially malignant disorders (e.g. oral leukoplakia, oral erythroplakia)
Any one of the above stages along with oral squamous cell carcinoma.
Functional stagingInterpretation
M1 StagingInterincisal mouth opening up to or greater than 35 mm.
M2 StagingInterincisal mouth opening between 25 and 35 mm.
M3 StagingInterincisal mouth opening between 15 and 25 mm.
M4 StagingInterincisal mouth opening less than 15 mm.
More et al. 2012 classification of OSMF

Approaches to non-surgical management.

Although there is general agreement regarding clinical staging, approaches to management of patients vary widely [54]. Numerous interventions have been reported and are summarized in Table 6 [60, 68–70]. Supportive regimens, such as vitamin and iron supplements, a mineral-rich diet, red fruits, green leafy vegetables, and green tea consumption, are often recommended but there are no good quality studies confirming their efficacy.
Table 6

Treatments for OSMF

Treatment typeAgentAuthorsStudy TypeSample size (n)Main findings
Antioxidant treatmentsLycopeneKaremore T. V. and Motwani M [55].Single blinded prospective study92Ingestion of 8 g/QD of lycopene (n = 46) for three months was shown to be effective in the reduction of burning mouth and mouth opening (p < 0.05) in patients with OSMF when compared to the placebo group (n = 46).
CurcuminHazarey V. et al. [56]Randomized control clinical trial30Sucking 2 g/QD of Curcumin lozenges (n = 15) with physiotherapy for three months showed a significant improvement in both mouth opening and in alleviating the burning sensation (p < 0.05) in comparison to the control group (clobetasol propionate 0.05%; (n = 15).
Micronutrient therapyMaher R. et al. [57]Single arm preliminary prospective study117Swallowing micronutrient supplements: vitamins A, B complex, C, D, E; and minerals iron, calcium, copper, zinc, and magnesium was observed to be significantly effective (p < 0.05) in reduction of sign and symptoms of OSMF over 3 years.
Spirulina and Aloe VeraPatil S. et al. [58]Double blinded prospective study42Ingestion of 500 mg/QD of Spirulina (n = 21) for 3 months was associated with a significant improvement in mouth opening and reduction in ulcers/erosions/vesicles (p < 0.05) in comparison to 5 mg of aloe vera (n = 21) for the same time. Improvement in burning sensation and pain associated with lesions was not found significant between two groups
Alam S. et al. [59]Double-blinded, placebo- controlled, parallel-group randomized controlled trial60Application of aloe vera gel over buccal mucosa, palate, retromolar region, and floor of the mouth twice daily during submucosal injection of hyaluronidase and dexamethasone (n = 15) and surgical treatment (buccal fat pad, nasolabial flap, or collagen membrane, (n = 15) treatment with 6 months of follow up was observed to be a significant adjuvant therapy in reduction of most of the symptoms of OSMF (p < 0.01), in comparison to a similar group of medicines alone, (n = 15) and surgical procedures (n = 15)] with no application of aloe vera.
Medicinal treatmentsSteroidsGoel S. et al. [60]Longitudinal prospective study2704 mg/ml/biweekly injections of Betamethasone diluted in 1.0 ml of 2% xylocaine for 6 months given on buccal mucosa, bilaterally, using an insulin syringe, with a half dose on each side, was showed significant improvement of mouth opening and reduction in burning sensation in a stage II and stage III OSMF group (p < 0.0001), in comparison to a control group which received no treatment over two years.
HyaluronidaseJames L. et al. [61]Retrospective study28Intralesional injection of Hyaluronidase 1500 IU mixed in 1.5 ml of dexamethasone and 0.5 ml of lignocaine hydrochloride biweekly for 4 weeks showed a significant improvement in mouth opening with net gain of 6 ± 2 mm (92%), reducing the burning sensation (89%), number of painful ulceration (78%) and blanching of oral mucosa (71%) for Grade III OSMF patients.
Colchicine + HyaluronidaseKrishnamoorthy B. & Khan M [62].Comparative prospective study501 mg/ day colchicine tablet and 0.5 ml intralesional Injection hyaluronidase 1500 IU/ once a week (group I, n = 25) for twelve weeks showed a significant improvement in mouth opening (p < 0.05) and reduced burning sensation (33% by second week) in comparison to subjects treated with 0.5 ml intralesional injection of hyaluronidase 1500 IU and 0.5 ml intralesional injection hydrocortisone acetate 25 mg/ml once a week alternatively (group II, n = 25).
Placental extractsSingh P. et al. [63]Comparative prospective study102 ml intralesional placental extract mixed with 2 ml of 2% lignocaine HCL weekly for an interval of 8 weeks showed an average improvement in mouth opening by 8.02 mm (average pretreatment mouth opening = 18.49 mm, average posttreatment mouth opening = 26.51 mm) with average marked reduction in burning sensation by 4.9 (average pretreatment burning sensation = 8.0, average posttreatment burning sensation = 3.1). Burning sensation was assessed using visual analogue scale with 0–10, where 0 = no burning sensation and 10 = maximum burning sensation.
IsoxupurineBhadage C. J. et al. [64]Prospective study4010 mg Isoxsuprine tablets/ QID with oral physiotherapy (Group A, n = 15) plus 2 ml dexamethasone by intralesional injection with 1500 IU hyaluronidase mixed with 1 ml of 2% lignocaine solution with adrenaline 1:80,000 (Group B, n = 15) for six weeks with a follow up of 4 months, showed a significant improvement in mouth opening (p < 0.05) and burning sensation (p < 0.00001) in comparison to the placebo group (only oral physiotherapy) (Group C, n = 10).
PentoxifyllineRajendran R. et al. [65]Randomized controlled clinical trial29400 mg/ TID of Pentoxifylline tablets (n = 14) for seven months showed a significant improvement in mouth opening (p < 0.0001), tongue protrusion (p < 0.05), relief from perioral fibrotic bands (p < 0.0001), subjective symptoms of intolerance to spices (p < 0.0001), burning sensation of mouth (p < 0.0001), tinnitus (p < 0.0001), difficulty in swallowing (p < 0.0001) and difficulty in speech (p < 0.0001) in comparison to the control group (multivitamin with local heat therapy, n = 15).
Oral physiotherapyUltrasound + PhysiotherapyKumar V. et al. [66]Single arm prospective study15Ultrasound therapy with 0.7–1.5 W/Cm2 with thumb kneading physiotherapy for six days/ week for two consecutive weeks showed significant improvement in mouth opening (p < 0.001) and reduction of burning sensation.
Surgical approachesSurgeryKamath V. V [67].Systematic ReviewLasers, tongue flap, palatal flap, buccal fat pad, nasolabial flap, thigh flaps, split skin grafts, collagen membrane, artificial dermis, human placenta grafts, coronoidectomies, muscle myotomies and oral stents. All surgeries have shown significant improvement in the symptoms of OSMF. However there exist no definite protocols and thus author comments that treatment remains subjective to the operating surgeon.
Treatments for OSMF

Malignant transformation of OSMF

OSMF is classified as an oral potentially malignant disorder (OPMD) [3]. Patients with OSMF have been reported with higher risk of developing oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), compared to other OPMD’s [71, 72]. Although 7.6% of OSMF cases transformed to oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) in a 17-year follow up study reported in 1970 [73], other studies with smaller follow up periods report malignant transformation rates ranging from 1.9–9%, [74-76] depending on diagnostic criteria and duration of follow up [77]. Studies suggest that malignant transformation in patients with OSMF differs from those without OSMF. This difference is believed to arise from the mechanism of areca nut carcinogenesis. A retrospective study conducted in China reported that oral cancer originating from OSMF is clinically more invasive and exhibits higher metastasis and recurrence rates compared to “conventional” OSCC [78]. In contrast, Chaturvedi et al. found that OC arising in a background of OSMF represented a clinico-pathologically distinct entity, less aggressive than the “conventional” tobacco-related OC’s seen in India [46]. Better prognostic features associated with OC occurring in a background of OSMF included early tumor stage, thinner lesions, fewer neck metastases with less extra-capsular spread, and more highly differentiated neoplasms. It was suggested that fibrosis in the oral mucosa and tumor stroma, with reduced vascularity, inhibits lymphatic and vascular spread [46]. Studies have shown higher risk of malignant transformation of OSMF when observed with simultaneous oral leukoplakia [77]. A wide array of studies was implemented recently to determine the possible mechanisms involved in malignant transformation, and many have focused their attention on molecular markers which could be helpful for early diagnosis and have possible, helpful therapeutic implications [79-81].

Proposed diagnostic and management approach

As with other lifestyle related diseases, primary prevention at population and individual levels needs to be improved. Space does not permit an exhaustive discussion of the approaches here but, in the case of OSMF, this involves education of the public regarding the dangers of areca nut and tobacco, and legislation to restrict the sale of gutkha and similar products [82-84]. Several Indian states have had success in this regard. Since May 2013, gutkha is banned in 24 states and 5 union territories of India, under the provision of centrally enacted Food Safety and Regulation (Prohibition) Act 2011 [85]. The ban is enforced by the State public health ministry, Food and Drug Administration and the local police. Although there is a significant reduction in the legal purchase of gutkha, the Supreme Court and higher enforcement bodies are still chasing to cease the illegal sale [85, 86]. What of the many millions already afflicted? Despite efforts to improve the management of OSMF, many come so late to diagnosis that cure is impossible, and interventions are of limited efficacy. So early diagnosis is of great importance. Further, most OSMF patients chew tobacco as well as an areca nut product, may imbibe unhealthy amounts of alcohol, and abuse other drugs. They often have dietary deficiencies. Therefore, they are at high risk of co-morbidities, including metabolic syndromes, respiratory, gastrointestinal/liver and cardiovascular diseases. (Fig. 4) [87, 88].
Fig. 4

Oral and Systemic outcomes of OSMF possible in the absence of holistic management

Oral and Systemic outcomes of OSMF possible in the absence of holistic management Dependent on their dominant symptoms, patients may seek consultation from either primary care physicians (PCP) or dentists. When examined by a dentist, the diagnostic and treatment approach is likely to be focused on the oral signs and symptoms. Conversely, when patients present to a PCP, the focus of management is likely to be general, with the oral condition under-investigated and under-managed. In most of the world, these patients are not managed by a multidisciplinary team. We propose an inter-professional approach that may increase rates of early diagnosis of OSMF and potentially malignant disorders/OSCC, with integrated management of both oral and systemic symptoms, improving long-term prognosis, reducing suffering and improving quality of life. When a patient presents to a dentist, and a clinical diagnosis of OSMF is made, he/she should be referred to their primary care physician with a note of planned dental management. If any underlying systemic disease is diagnosed, the medical treatment plan should be communicated back to the dentist. If no systemic disease is diagnosed, a written medical clearance letter, including an assessment of risks of developing any systemic condition, and recommendations for review visits, should be included. When a patient presents to a physician, if he/she is a user of areca nut, and especially if restricted mouth opening is present, he/she should be immediately referred to a dentist detailing any planned management of other disease. The dentist should report back to the physician with a treatment plan for OSMF, if present, or dental clearance letter with a suggested risk of developing OSMF or any other oral disease. This, after all, should be routine in any integrated health care system.

Conclusion

Although studied intensively over many decades, one might say centuries, especially in South Asia, OSMF is hardly recognized and is poorly understood across the globe. The incidence is rising; there has been no significant improvement in management, nor reduction in its high malignant transformation rate. Better integration of medical and dental services, especially in developing countries, may reduce patients’ suffering and improve their life quality. All health care professions must work together in public education and primary prevention.
Table 2

Major aetiology of Oral Submucous Fibrosis

Major aetiologyDescription
Chewing of Areca nut (Baked or Raw) and/or derivatives such as Gutkha, Pan masala, Mawa, Betel quid, Sweet Supari and other formulations.Arecoline and Arecaidine nitrosation causes DNA alkylation with proliferation of fibroblasts and elevated collagen synthesis [39].
Table 3

Contributing risk factors for Oral Submucous Fibrosis

Contributing factorsDescription
Chewing smokeless tobaccoDip, Snuff, Snus and chewing tobacco have been reported as major contributing factors [34, 35, 39, 40].
NutritionalDeficiencies of iron, folate & vitamin B12 result in mucosal atrophy, notably in the mouth. Increased levels of iron enhance hydroxylation of proline and lysine in the process of collagen synthesis [40].
ChiliesHypersensitivity reactions to capsaicin might contribute to fibrosis [4143].
Toxic levels of copperCopper upregulates the enzyme lysyl oxidase, enhancing cross linking of collagen and elastin [35, 44, 45].
Genetic predispositionHLA-A10, HLA-B7, HLA-DR3, haplotypes A10/DR3, B3/DR3 and A10/B8 are found in increased frequency in OSMF patients [45].
Immunological predispositionSubjects with high endogenous expression of CD4 and HLA-DR on lymphocytes and Langerhans cells may have dysregulation of their immune-inflammatory response with bystander tissue injury [45].
  69 in total

1.  Cancer of the buccal mucosa; a clinical study of 650 cases in Indian patients.

Authors:  J C PAYMASTER
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1956 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 2.  Proposed clinical classification for oral submucous fibrosis.

Authors:  Chandramani B More; Sunanda Das; Hetul Patel; Chhaya Adalja; Vaishnavee Kamatchi; Rashmi Venkatesh
Journal:  Oral Oncol       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 5.337

3.  Prevalence of oral pre-malignant and malignant lesions at a tertiary level hospital in Allahabad, India.

Authors:  Ravi Mehrotra; Shruti Pandya; Ajay Kr Chaudhary; Mahendra Kumar; Mamta Singh
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2008 Apr-Jun

Review 4.  A systematic review of medical interventions for oral submucous fibrosis and future research opportunities.

Authors:  A R Kerr; S Warnakulasuriya; A J Mighell; T Dietrich; M Nasser; J Rimal; A Jalil; M M Bornstein; T Nagao; F Fortune; V H Hazarey; P A Reichart; S Silverman; N W Johnson
Journal:  Oral Dis       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 3.511

5.  Frequency of oral leukoplakias and related conditions among 10,000 Bombayites. Preliminary report.

Authors:  J J Pindborg; H K Kalapessi; S A Kale; B Singh; B N Talyerkhan
Journal:  J All India Dent Assoc       Date:  1965-07

6.  Oral submucous fibrosis: study of 1000 cases from central India.

Authors:  V K Hazarey; D M Erlewad; K A Mundhe; S N Ughade
Journal:  J Oral Pathol Med       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 4.253

7.  Community-based model for preventing tobacco use among disadvantaged adolescents in urban slums of India.

Authors:  Monika Arora; Abha Tewari; Vikal Tripathy; Gaurang P Nazar; Neeru S Juneja; Lakshmy Ramakrishnan; K Srinath Reddy
Journal:  Health Promot Int       Date:  2010-02-27       Impact factor: 2.483

Review 8.  A novel clinical protocol for therapeutic intervention in oral submucous fibrosis: An evidence based approach.

Authors:  Chandramani Bhagwan More; Nishma Gavli; Youbai Chen; Naman Rajeshkumar Rao
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Pathol       Date:  2018 Sep-Dec

9.  Prevalence study of oral mucosal lesions, mucosal variants, and treatment required for patients reporting to a dental school in North India: In accordance with WHO guidelines.

Authors:  Puneet Bhatnagar; Shalu Rai; Gunjan Bhatnagar; Mandeep Kaur; Sumit Goel; Mukul Prabhat
Journal:  J Family Community Med       Date:  2013-01

Review 10.  Oral submucous fibrosis: Newer proposed classification with critical updates in pathogenesis and management strategies.

Authors:  Deepak Passi; Prateek Bhanot; Dhruv Kacker; Deepak Chahal; Mansi Atri; Yoshi Panwar
Journal:  Natl J Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2017 Jul-Dec
View more
  21 in total

1.  Causal inference and directed acyclic graph: An epidemiological concept much needed for oral submucous fibrosis.

Authors:  Naman R Rao; Chandramani B More; Rahi M Brahmbhatt; Youbai Chen; Wai-Kit Ming
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2020-07-03

2.  Validity of Toluidine Blue test as a diagnostic tool for high risk oral potentially malignant disorders- a multicentre study in Sri Lanka.

Authors:  R D Jayasinghe; P V K S Hettiarachchi; Dilrukshi Amugoda; Menaka Kumaraarachchi; R L P R Liyanage; B S M S Siriwardena; Ranjith Gunasena; A H T S Karunatilake; H K Amarasinghe
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2020-08-19

Review 3.  Efficacy of lycopene in management of Oral Submucous Fibrosis- A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Neha Gupta; Ashita Kalaskar; Ritesh Kalaskar
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2020-09-17

4.  Evaluation of mast cells and burning sensation in various stages of Oral Submucous Fibrosis.

Authors:  Laliytha Bijai Kumar; Philips Mathew; Nirmal Madhavan; Sabin Siddique; Nandita Kshetrimayum; Kiran Iyer
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2020-07-31

5.  Biochemical status of serum iron in histopathological grades of oral submucous fibrosis.

Authors:  Toniya Raut; Shashi Keshwar; Jyotsna Rimal; Madhab Lamsal; Ashish Shrestha
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2020-10-19

6.  Evaluation of serum immunoglobulin (IgG, IgM, IgA) in potentially malignant disorders of oral cavity - A case control study.

Authors:  Vivek M Tarsariya; Dhaval N Mehta; Nilesh Raval; Hiren H Patadiya; Kanan Vachhrajani; Albert Ashem
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2020-09-08

7.  Current challenges and the diagnostic pitfalls in the grading of epithelial dysplasia in oral potentially malignant disorders: A review.

Authors:  Sonia Gupta; Manveen Kaur Jawanda; G S Madhushankari
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2020-09-19

8.  Medicinal management of oral submucous fibrosis in the past decade- A systematic review.

Authors:  Chandramani B More; Deepa Jatti Patil; Naman R Rao
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2020-08-19

Review 9.  Clinical efficacy of mouth exercising devices in oral submucous fibrosis: A systematic review.

Authors:  Shailesh M Gondivkar; Amol R Gadbail; Sachin C Sarode; Rima S Gondivkar; Shankargouda Patil; Rahul N Gaikwad; Monal Yuwanati
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2020-07-03

10.  Characterization of anti-nuclear antibodies in patients with oral submucous fibrosis and its clinicopathologic implications - An immunofluorescence study.

Authors:  Aprna Gupta; Surya Narayan Das; Bijoy Kumar Das; Lipsa Bhuyan
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Pathol       Date:  2021-05-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.