Literature DB >> 17045717

Patients, privacy and trust: patients' willingness to allow researchers to access their medical records.

Laura J Damschroder1, Joy L Pritts, Michael A Neblo, Rosemarie J Kalarickal, John W Creswell, Rodney A Hayward.   

Abstract

The federal Privacy Rule, implemented in the United States in 2003, as part of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA), created new restrictions on the release of medical information for research. Many believe that its restrictions have fallen disproportionately on researchers prompting some to call for changes to the Rule. Here we ask what patients think about researchers' access to medical records, and what influences these opinions. A sample of 217 patients from 4 Veteran Affairs (VA) facilities deliberated in small groups at each location with the opportunity to question experts and inform themselves about privacy issues related to medical records research. After extensive deliberation, these patients were united in their inclination to share their medical records for research. Yet they were also united in their recommendations to institute procedures that would give them more control over whether and how their medical records are used for research. We integrated qualitative and quantitative results to derive a better understanding of this apparent paradox. Our findings can best be presented as answers to questions related to five dimensions of trust: Patients' trust in VA researchers was the most powerful determinant of the kind of control they want over their medical records. More specifically, those who had lower trust in VA researchers were more likely to recommend a more stringent process for obtaining individual consent. Insights on the critical role of trust suggest actions that researchers and others can take to more fully engage patients in research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17045717     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.08.045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  74 in total

1.  Strategies for maintaining patient privacy in i2b2.

Authors:  Shawn N Murphy; Vivian Gainer; Michael Mendis; Susanne Churchill; Isaac Kohane
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2011-10-07       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Randomized trial showed that an "embedded" survey strategy optimized authorization rates compared with two "after survey" strategies in veterans with PTSD.

Authors:  Maureen Murdoch; Diane M Pietila; Melissa R Partin
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2010-03-21       Impact factor: 6.437

3.  Assessing the quality of democratic deliberation: a case study of public deliberation on the ethics of surrogate consent for research.

Authors:  Raymond De Vries; Aimee Stanczyk; Ian F Wall; Rebecca Uhlmann; Laura J Damschroder; Scott Y Kim
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 4.634

4.  Patient Preferences Regarding Informed Consent Models for Participation in a Learning Health Care System for Oncology.

Authors:  Rochelle D Jones; Chris Krenz; Michele Gornick; Kent A Griffith; Rebecca Spence; Angela R Bradbury; Raymond De Vries; Sarah T Hawley; Rodney A Hayward; Robin Zon; Sage Bolte; Navid Sadeghi; Richard L Schilsky; Reshma Jagsi
Journal:  JCO Oncol Pract       Date:  2020-04-30

5.  Does an interactive trust-enhanced electronic consent improve patient experiences when asked to share their health records for research? A randomized trial.

Authors:  Christopher A Harle; Elizabeth H Golembiewski; Kiarash P Rahmanian; Babette Brumback; Janice L Krieger; Kenneth W Goodman; Arch G Mainous; Ray E Moseley
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 4.497

6.  Extracting information from hospital records: what patients think about consent.

Authors:  Bruce Campbell; Helen Thomson; Jessica Slater; Colin Coward; Katrina Wyatt; Kieran Sweeney
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2007-12

7.  Alternatives to project-specific consent for access to personal information for health research: what is the opinion of the Canadian public?

Authors:  Donald J Willison; Lisa Schwartz; Julia Abelson; Cathy Charles; Marilyn Swinton; David Northrup; Lehana Thabane
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2007-08-21       Impact factor: 4.497

8.  Beyond Consent: Building Trusting Relationships With Diverse Populations in Precision Medicine Research.

Authors:  Stephanie A Kraft; Mildred K Cho; Katherine Gillespie; Meghan Halley; Nina Varsava; Kelly E Ormond; Harold S Luft; Benjamin S Wilfond; Sandra Soo-Jin Lee
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 11.229

9.  Designing a patient-centered user interface for access decisions about EHR data: implications from patient interviews.

Authors:  Kelly Caine; Spencer Kohn; Carrie Lawrence; Rima Hanania; Eric M Meslin; William M Tierney
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Patient informed governance of distributed research networks: results and discussion from six patient focus groups.

Authors:  Laura A Mamo; Dennis K Browe; Holly C Logan; Katherine K Kim
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2013-11-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.