Literature DB >> 31901562

Heterogeneous correlations between hippocampus volume and cognitive map accuracy among healthy young adults.

Qiliang He1, Thackery I Brown2.   

Abstract

Marked individual differences in the ability to mentally map our environment are pronounced not only among people of different ages or clinical conditions, but also within healthy young adults. Previous studies have shown that hippocampus size positively correlated with spatial navigation ability in healthy young adults, navigation experts, and patients with hippocampus lesions. However, a recent pre-registered study (Weisberg, Newcombe, & Chatterjee, 2019) with a large sample size (n = 90) did not observe this correlation in healthy young adults. Motivated by evidence that self-report sense of direction (SOD) could have a profound impact on how individuals utilize environmental cues, and that different navigation strategies could have opposite impacts on wayfinding performance in individuals with different cognitive map formation (CMF) abilities, we reanalyzed the publicly available dataset from Weisberg et al.'s study. We tested the influence of participants' SOD and CMF abilities on hippocampal volume-performance relationships. We find evidence that the non-significant correlation could envelop heterogeneous correlations among subgroups of individuals: the correlation between the right posterior hippocampal volume and spatial learning performance is significantly higher among individuals with high spatial ability than individuals with low spatial ability. This pattern of performance was observed for both SOD and CMF moderations of the relationship between hippocampal volume and spatial learning. While our re-analyses are fundamentally exploratory in nature, the new results imply that the relationship between hippocampal volume and spatial learning performance might be more complicated than previously thought. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cognitive map; Hippocampus; Individual differences; Spatial navigation

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31901562      PMCID: PMC7069601          DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2019.11.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cortex        ISSN: 0010-9452            Impact factor:   4.027


  24 in total

1.  Spatial knowledge acquisition from direct experience in the environment: individual differences in the development of metric knowledge and the integration of separately learned places.

Authors:  Toru Ishikawa; Daniel R Montello
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2005-12-22       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Developmental Topographical Disorientation.

Authors:  Giuseppe Iaria; Ford Burles
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 20.229

3.  Navigation-related structural change in the hippocampi of taxi drivers.

Authors:  E A Maguire; D G Gadian; I S Johnsrude; C D Good; J Ashburner; R S Frackowiak; C D Frith
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-04-11       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Structural Differences in Hippocampal and Entorhinal Gray Matter Volume Support Individual Differences in First Person Navigational Ability.

Authors:  Katherine R Sherrill; Elizabeth R Chrastil; Irem Aselcioglu; Michael E Hasselmo; Chantal E Stern
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 3.590

5.  Acquisition and transfer of spatial knowledge during wayfinding.

Authors:  Qiliang He; Timothy P McNamara; Bobby Bodenheimer; Alexander Klippel
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2018-08-20       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 6.  What determines our navigational abilities?

Authors:  Thomas Wolbers; Mary Hegarty
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2010-02-06       Impact factor: 20.229

7.  Brain size and cognitive ability: Correlations with age, sex, social class, and race.

Authors:  J P Rushton; C D Ankney
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1996-03

8.  How do (some) people make a cognitive map? Routes, places, and working memory.

Authors:  Steven M Weisberg; Nora S Newcombe
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  Differential connectivity of perirhinal and parahippocampal cortices within human hippocampal subregions revealed by high-resolution functional imaging.

Authors:  Laura A Libby; Arne D Ekstrom; J Daniel Ragland; Charan Ranganath
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-05-09       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Individual Differences in Human Path Integration Abilities Correlate with Gray Matter Volume in Retrosplenial Cortex, Hippocampus, and Medial Prefrontal Cortex.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Chrastil; Katherine R Sherrill; Irem Aselcioglu; Michael E Hasselmo; Chantal E Stern
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2017-04-17
View more
  3 in total

1.  The role of working memory capacity in spatial learning depends on spatial information integration difficulty in the environment.

Authors:  Qiliang He; Andrew T Han; Tanya A Churaman; Thackery I Brown
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2020-09-14

2.  A comparison of reinforcement learning models of human spatial navigation.

Authors:  Qiliang He; Jancy Ling Liu; Lou Eschapasse; Elizabeth H Beveridge; Thackery I Brown
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 4.996

3.  Environmental overlap and individual encoding strategy modulate memory interference in spatial navigation.

Authors:  Qiliang He; Elizabeth H Beveridge; Jon Starnes; Sarah C Goodroe; Thackery I Brown
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2020-11-07
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.