Literature DB >> 16375882

Spatial knowledge acquisition from direct experience in the environment: individual differences in the development of metric knowledge and the integration of separately learned places.

Toru Ishikawa1, Daniel R Montello.   

Abstract

Existing frameworks for explaining spatial knowledge acquisition in a new environment propose either stage-like or continuous development. To examine the spatial microgenesis of individuals, a longitudinal study was conducted. Twenty-four college students were individually driven along two routes in a previously unfamiliar neighborhood over 10 weekly sessions. Starting Session 4, they were also driven along a short connecting route. After each session, participants estimated spatial properties of the routes. Some participants' knowledge improved fairly continuously over the sessions, but most participants either manifested accurate metric knowledge from the first session or never manifested accurate metric knowledge. Results are discussed in light of these large individual differences, particularly with respect to the accuracy and development of integrated configurational knowledge.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16375882     DOI: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2005.08.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Psychol        ISSN: 0010-0285            Impact factor:   3.468


  75 in total

1.  Are allocentric spatial reference frames compatible with theories of Enactivism?

Authors:  Sabine U König; Caspar Goeke; Tobias Meilinger; Peter König
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-08-02

Review 2.  Active and passive contributions to spatial learning.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Chrastil; William H Warren
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-02

3.  From maps to navigation: the role of cues in finding locations in a virtual environment.

Authors:  Adam T Hutcheson; Douglas H Wedell
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-08

4.  Instructions matter: Individual differences in navigation strategy and ability.

Authors:  Alexander P Boone; Bryan Maghen; Mary Hegarty
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2019-10

5.  The integration of spatial information across different viewpoints.

Authors:  Tobias Meilinger; Alain Berthoz; Jan M Wiener
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-08

6.  Route and survey processing of topographical memory during navigation.

Authors:  Luca Latini-Corazzini; Marie Pascale Nesa; Mathieu Ceccaldi; Eric Guedj; Catherine Thinus-Blanc; Franco Cauda; Federico D'Agata; Federico Dagata; Patrick Péruch
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2010-02-20

7.  Innovative testing of spatial ability: interactive responding and the use of complex stimuli material.

Authors:  Martin Jelínek; Petr Květon; Dalibor Vobořil
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2014-11-02

8.  How different spatial representations interact in virtual environments: the role of mental frame syncing.

Authors:  Silvia Serino; Giuseppe Riva
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2015-02-07

9.  Verbalizing, visualizing, and navigating: The effect of strategies on encoding a large-scale virtual environment.

Authors:  David J M Kraemer; Victor R Schinazi; Philip B Cawkwell; Anand Tekriwal; Russell A Epstein; Sharon L Thompson-Schill
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  A novel real-space navigation paradigm reveals age- and gender-dependent changes of navigational strategies and hippocampal activation.

Authors:  Stephanie Irving; Florian Schöberl; Cauchy Pradhan; Matthias Brendel; Peter Bartenstein; Marianne Dieterich; Thomas Brandt; Andreas Zwergal
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2018-08-02       Impact factor: 4.849

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.