Literature DB >> 32924520

The role of working memory capacity in spatial learning depends on spatial information integration difficulty in the environment.

Qiliang He1, Andrew T Han2, Tanya A Churaman2, Thackery I Brown1.   

Abstract

A substantial amount of research has been conducted to uncover factors underlying the pronounced individual differences in spatial navigation. Spatial working memory capacity (SWM) is shown to be one important factor. In other domains such as reading comprehension, the role of working memory capacity in task performance differences depends on the difficulty of other task demands. In the current study, we investigated whether, similarly, the relationship between SWM and spatial performance was dependent on the difficulty of spatial information integration in the environment. Based on our prior work, spatial information integration difficulty depends on (a) difficulty in observing spatial relationships between locations of interest in the environment and (b) the individual's ability to integrate such relationships. Leveraging virtual reality, we manipulated the difficulty in observing the spatial relationships during learning by changing the visibility of the buildings, and measured individual's self-report sense of direction (SOD) which modulates the ability to integrate such relationships under different degrees of visibility. We consistently found that in the "easy" spatial integration condition (high SOD with high visibility), high SWM did not significantly improve spatial learning. The same pattern was observed in the difficult condition (low SOD with low visibility). On the other hand, high SWM improved spatial learning for medium difficulty (high SOD with low visibility, or vice versa). Together, our results reveal that the role of SWM in spatial learning differences depends on spatial integration difficulty. Our results also have significant applied implications for using virtual reality to target and facilitate spatial learning. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32924520      PMCID: PMC7956123          DOI: 10.1037/xge0000972

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen        ISSN: 0022-1015


  37 in total

1.  Evolved mechanisms underlying wayfinding. further studies on the hunter-gatherer theory of spatial sex differences.

Authors: 
Journal:  Evol Hum Behav       Date:  2000-05-01       Impact factor: 4.178

2.  Training in virtual environments: transfer to real world tasks and equivalence to real task training.

Authors:  F D Rose; E A Attree; B M Brooks; D M Parslow; P R Penn; N Ambihaipahan
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 3.  Lifespan age differences in working memory: a two-component framework.

Authors:  Myriam C Sander; Ulman Lindenberger; Markus Werkle-Bergner
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 8.989

Review 4.  Building a cognitive map by assembling multiple path integration systems.

Authors:  Ranxiao Frances Wang
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-06

5.  Spatial knowledge acquisition from direct experience in the environment: individual differences in the development of metric knowledge and the integration of separately learned places.

Authors:  Toru Ishikawa; Daniel R Montello
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2005-12-22       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 6.  Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user's guide.

Authors:  Andrew R A Conway; Michael J Kane; Michael F Bunting; D Zach Hambrick; Oliver Wilhelm; Randall W Engle
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-10

7.  Socioeconomic background modulates cognition-achievement relationships in reading.

Authors:  Kimberly G Noble; Martha J Farah; Bruce D McCandliss
Journal:  Cogn Dev       Date:  2006

8.  How do (some) people make a cognitive map? Routes, places, and working memory.

Authors:  Steven M Weisberg; Nora S Newcombe
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  Manipulating the visibility of barriers to improve spatial navigation efficiency and cognitive mapping.

Authors:  Qiliang He; Timothy P McNamara; Thackery I Brown
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 10.  The Aging Navigational System.

Authors:  Adam W Lester; Scott D Moffat; Jan M Wiener; Carol A Barnes; Thomas Wolbers
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 17.173

View more
  4 in total

1.  A comparison of reinforcement learning models of human spatial navigation.

Authors:  Qiliang He; Jancy Ling Liu; Lou Eschapasse; Elizabeth H Beveridge; Thackery I Brown
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 4.996

2.  Symmetry and spatial ability enhance change detection in visuospatial structures.

Authors:  Chuanxiuyue He; Zoe Rathbun; Daniel Buonauro; Hauke S Meyerhoff; Steven L Franconeri; Mike Stieff; Mary Hegarty
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2022-06-15

3.  Environmental overlap and individual encoding strategy modulate memory interference in spatial navigation.

Authors:  Qiliang He; Elizabeth H Beveridge; Jon Starnes; Sarah C Goodroe; Thackery I Brown
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2020-11-07

4.  Differential prioritization of intramaze cue and boundary information during spatial navigation across the human lifespan.

Authors:  Franka Glöckner; Nicolas W Schuck; Shu-Chen Li
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-27       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.