Literature DB >> 33172657

Environmental overlap and individual encoding strategy modulate memory interference in spatial navigation.

Qiliang He1, Elizabeth H Beveridge1, Jon Starnes1, Sarah C Goodroe2, Thackery I Brown3.   

Abstract

There has been great interest in how previously acquired knowledge interacts with newly learned knowledge and how prior knowledge facilitates semantic and "schema" learning. In studies of episodic memory, it is broadly associated with interference. Very few studies have examined the balance between interference and facilitation over the course of temporally-extended events and its individual differences. In the present study, we recruited 120 participants for a two-day spatial navigation experiment, wherein participants on Day 2 navigated virtual routes that were learned from Day 1 while also learning new routes. Critically, half of the new mazes overlapped with the old mazes, while the other half did not, enabling us to examine interference and facilitation in the context of spatial episodic learning. Overall, we found that navigation performance in new mazes that overlapped with previously-learned routes was significantly worse than the new non-overlapping mazes, suggesting proactive interference. Interestingly, we found memory facilitation for new routes in familiar environments in locations where there was no direct overlap with the previously-learned routes. Cognitive map accuracy positively correlated with proactive interference. Moreover, participants with high self-report spatial ability and/or a preference for place-based learning experienced more proactive interference. Taken together, our results show that 1) both memory interference and facilitation can co-occur as a function of prior learning, 2) proactive interference within a route varied as a function of the degree of overlap with old knowledge, and 3) individual differences in spatial ability and strategy can modulate proactive interference.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Episodic memory; Individual differences; Memory facilitation; Proactive and retroactive interference; Spatial navigation

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33172657      PMCID: PMC7779693          DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104508

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  30 in total

Review 1.  Developmental change in proactive interference.

Authors:  Robert Kail
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec

2.  Assessing the age-related effects of proactive interference on working memory tasks using the Rasch model.

Authors:  Ryan P Bowles; Timothy A Salthouse
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2003-09

3.  Interference and forgetting.

Authors:  B J UNDERWOOD
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1957-01       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 4.  Brain mechanisms of proactive interference in working memory.

Authors:  J Jonides; D E Nee
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2005-12-05       Impact factor: 3.590

5.  Spatial knowledge acquisition from direct experience in the environment: individual differences in the development of metric knowledge and the integration of separately learned places.

Authors:  Toru Ishikawa; Daniel R Montello
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2005-12-22       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Sleep's function in the spontaneous recovery and consolidation of memories.

Authors:  Spyridon Drosopoulos; Claudia Schulze; Stefan Fischer; Jan Born
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2007-05

7.  Effect of sleep on memory.

Authors:  B R Ekstrand
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1967-09

8.  Effects of age on navigation strategy.

Authors:  M Kirk Rodgers; Joseph A Sindone; Scott D Moffat
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 4.673

9.  Hippocampal representation of related and opposing memories develop within distinct, hierarchically organized neural schemas.

Authors:  Sam McKenzie; Andrea J Frank; Nathaniel R Kinsky; Blake Porter; Pamela D Rivière; Howard Eichenbaum
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 17.173

10.  The Complex Nature of Hippocampal-Striatal Interactions in Spatial Navigation.

Authors:  Sarah C Goodroe; Jon Starnes; Thackery I Brown
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  1 in total

1.  A comparison of reinforcement learning models of human spatial navigation.

Authors:  Qiliang He; Jancy Ling Liu; Lou Eschapasse; Elizabeth H Beveridge; Thackery I Brown
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 4.996

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.