Literature DB >> 31892409

Rapid Simulation of Unprocessed DEER Decay Data for Protein Fold Prediction.

Diego Del Alamo1, Maxx H Tessmer2, Richard A Stein3, Jimmy B Feix4, Hassane S Mchaourab1, Jens Meiler5.   

Abstract

Despite advances in sampling and scoring strategies, Monte Carlo modeling methods still struggle to accurately predict de novo the structures of large proteins, membrane proteins, or proteins of complex topologies. Previous approaches have addressed these shortcomings by leveraging sparse distance data gathered using site-directed spin labeling and electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy to improve protein structure prediction and refinement outcomes. However, existing computational implementations entail compromises between coarse-grained models of the spin label that lower the resolution and explicit models that lead to resource-intense simulations. These methods are further limited by their reliance on distance distributions, which are calculated from a primary refocused echo decay signal and contain uncertainties that may require manual refinement. Here, we addressed these challenges by developing RosettaDEER, a scoring method within the Rosetta software suite capable of simulating double electron-electron resonance spectroscopy decay traces and distance distributions between spin labels fast enough to fold proteins de novo. We demonstrate that the accuracy of resulting distance distributions match or exceed those generated by more computationally intensive methods. Moreover, decay traces generated from these distributions recapitulate intermolecular background coupling parameters even when the time window of data collection is truncated. As a result, RosettaDEER can discriminate between poorly folded and native-like models by using decay traces that cannot be accurately converted into distance distributions using regularized fitting approaches. Finally, using two challenging test cases, we demonstrate that RosettaDEER leverages these experimental data for protein fold prediction more effectively than previous methods. These benchmarking results confirm that RosettaDEER can effectively leverage sparse experimental data for a wide array of modeling applications built into the Rosetta software suite.
Copyright © 2019 Biophysical Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31892409      PMCID: PMC6976798          DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2019.12.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  63 in total

1.  Rapid protein fold determination using unassigned NMR data.

Authors:  Jens Meiler; David Baker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-12-10       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Algorithm for selection of optimized EPR distance restraints for de novo protein structure determination.

Authors:  Kelli Kazmier; Nathan S Alexander; Jens Meiler; Hassane S McHaourab
Journal:  J Struct Biol       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 2.867

3.  Relative Orientation of POTRA Domains from Cyanobacterial Omp85 Studied by Pulsed EPR Spectroscopy.

Authors:  Reza Dastvan; Eva-Maria Brouwer; Denise Schuetz; Oliver Mirus; Enrico Schleiff; Thomas F Prisner
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Protein homology model refinement by large-scale energy optimization.

Authors:  Hahnbeom Park; Sergey Ovchinnikov; David E Kim; Frank DiMaio; David Baker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Computer modeling of nitroxide spin labels on proteins.

Authors:  Ma'mon M Hatmal; Yiyu Li; Balachandra G Hegde; Prabhavati B Hegde; Christine C Jao; Ralf Langen; Ian S Haworth
Journal:  Biopolymers       Date:  2011-07-25       Impact factor: 2.505

6.  Combining NMR and EPR methods for homodimer protein structure determination.

Authors:  Yunhuang Yang; Theresa A Ramelot; Robert M McCarrick; Shuisong Ni; Erik A Feldmann; John R Cort; Huang Wang; Colleen Ciccosanti; Mei Jiang; Haleema Janjua; Thomas B Acton; Rong Xiao; John K Everett; Gaetano T Montelione; Michael A Kennedy
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 15.419

7.  Protein dynamics and monomer-monomer interactions in AntR activation by electron paramagnetic resonance and double electron-electron resonance.

Authors:  K Ilker Sen; Timothy M Logan; Piotr G Fajer
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2007-09-19       Impact factor: 3.162

8.  Structural refinement from restrained-ensemble simulations based on EPR/DEER data: application to T4 lysozyme.

Authors:  Shahidul M Islam; Richard A Stein; Hassane S McHaourab; Benoît Roux
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 2.991

9.  Conformational dynamics of ligand-dependent alternating access in LeuT.

Authors:  Kelli Kazmier; Shruti Sharma; Matthias Quick; Shahidul M Islam; Benoît Roux; Harel Weinstein; Jonathan A Javitch; Hassane S McHaourab
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2014-04-20       Impact factor: 15.369

10.  Large-scale determination of previously unsolved protein structures using evolutionary information.

Authors:  Sergey Ovchinnikov; Lisa Kinch; Hahnbeom Park; Yuxing Liao; Jimin Pei; David E Kim; Hetunandan Kamisetty; Nick V Grishin; David Baker
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 8.140

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Hybrid methods for combined experimental and computational determination of protein structure.

Authors:  Justin T Seffernick; Steffen Lindert
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2020-12-28       Impact factor: 3.488

2.  Integrated AlphaFold2 and DEER investigation of the conformational dynamics of a pH-dependent APC antiporter.

Authors:  Diego Del Alamo; Lillian DeSousa; Rahul M Nair; Suhaila Rahman; Jens Meiler; Hassane S Mchaourab
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-08-15       Impact factor: 12.779

3.  Comparative evaluation of spin-label modeling methods for protein structural studies.

Authors:  Maxx H Tessmer; Elizabeth R Canarie; Stefan Stoll
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2022-08-10       Impact factor: 3.699

4.  Modeling of protein conformational changes with Rosetta guided by limited experimental data.

Authors:  Davide Sala; Diego Del Alamo; Hassane S Mchaourab; Jens Meiler
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2022-05-20       Impact factor: 5.871

5.  AlphaFold2 predicts the inward-facing conformation of the multidrug transporter LmrP.

Authors:  Diego Del Alamo; Cédric Govaerts; Hassane S Mchaourab
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2021-05-18

6.  Prediction of Protein Complex Structure Using Surface-Induced Dissociation and Cryo-Electron Microscopy.

Authors:  Justin T Seffernick; Shane M Canfield; Sophie R Harvey; Vicki H Wysocki; Steffen Lindert
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 8.008

7.  Characterization of the ExoU activation mechanism using EPR and integrative modeling.

Authors:  Maxx H Tessmer; Samuel A DeCero; Diego Del Alamo; Molly O Riegert; Jens Meiler; Dara W Frank; Jimmy B Feix
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-12       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  DEER-PREdict: Software for efficient calculation of spin-labeling EPR and NMR data from conformational ensembles.

Authors:  Giulio Tesei; João M Martins; Micha B A Kunze; Yong Wang; Ramon Crehuet; Kresten Lindorff-Larsen
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 4.475

Review 9.  DEER Analysis of GPCR Conformational Heterogeneity.

Authors:  Matthias Elgeti; Wayne L Hubbell
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2021-05-22

10.  Time-resolved DEER EPR and solid-state NMR afford kinetic and structural elucidation of substrate binding to Ca2+-ligated calmodulin.

Authors:  Thomas Schmidt; Jaekyun Jeon; Wai-Ming Yau; Charles D Schwieters; Robert Tycko; G Marius Clore
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 12.779

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.