Literature DB >> 21074624

Algorithm for selection of optimized EPR distance restraints for de novo protein structure determination.

Kelli Kazmier1, Nathan S Alexander, Jens Meiler, Hassane S McHaourab.   

Abstract

A hybrid protein structure determination approach combining sparse Electron Paramagnetic Resonance (EPR) distance restraints and Rosetta de novo protein folding has been previously demonstrated to yield high quality models (Alexander et al. (2008)). However, widespread application of this methodology to proteins of unknown structures is hindered by the lack of a general strategy to place spin label pairs in the primary sequence. In this work, we report the development of an algorithm that optimally selects spin labeling positions for the purpose of distance measurements by EPR. For the α-helical subdomain of T4 lysozyme (T4L), simulated restraints that maximize sequence separation between the two spin labels while simultaneously ensuring pairwise connectivity of secondary structure elements yielded vastly improved models by Rosetta folding. 54% of all these models have the correct fold compared to only 21% and 8% correctly folded models when randomly placed restraints or no restraints are used, respectively. Moreover, the improvements in model quality require a limited number of optimized restraints, which is determined by the pairwise connectivities of T4L α-helices. The predicted improvement in Rosetta model quality was verified by experimental determination of distances between spin labels pairs selected by the algorithm. Overall, our results reinforce the rationale for the combined use of sparse EPR distance restraints and de novo folding. By alleviating the experimental bottleneck associated with restraint selection, this algorithm sets the stage for extending computational structure determination to larger, traditionally elusive protein topologies of critical structural and biochemical importance.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21074624      PMCID: PMC3073550          DOI: 10.1016/j.jsb.2010.11.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Struct Biol        ISSN: 1047-8477            Impact factor:   2.867


  60 in total

1.  Interresidual distance determination by four-pulse double electron-electron resonance in an integral membrane protein: the Na+/proline transporter PutP of Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Gunnar Jeschke; Christoph Wegener; Monika Nietschke; Heinrich Jung; Heinz-Jürgen Steinhoff
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Toward high-resolution de novo structure prediction for small proteins.

Authors:  Philip Bradley; Kira M S Misura; David Baker
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-09-16       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Multipass membrane protein structure prediction using Rosetta.

Authors:  Vladimir Yarov-Yarovoy; Jack Schonbrun; David Baker
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2006-03-01

4.  The determination of pair distance distributions by pulsed ESR using Tikhonov regularization.

Authors:  Yun-Wei Chiang; Peter P Borbat; Jack H Freed
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.229

Review 5.  Macromolecular modeling with rosetta.

Authors:  Rhiju Das; David Baker
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 23.643

6.  Spin labeling analysis of structure and dynamics of the Na(+)/proline transporter of Escherichia coli.

Authors:  C Wegener; S Tebbe; H J Steinhoff; H Jung
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2000-04-25       Impact factor: 3.162

7.  Solvent accessible surface area approximations for rapid and accurate protein structure prediction.

Authors:  Elizabeth Durham; Brent Dorr; Nils Woetzel; René Staritzbichler; Jens Meiler
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2009-02-21       Impact factor: 1.810

8.  Conformational cycle of the ABC transporter MsbA in liposomes: detailed analysis using double electron-electron resonance spectroscopy.

Authors:  Ping Zou; Marco Bortolus; Hassane S McHaourab
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2009-08-26       Impact factor: 5.469

9.  Sugar binding induces an outward facing conformation of LacY.

Authors:  Irina Smirnova; Vladimir Kasho; Jun-Yong Choe; Christian Altenbach; Wayne L Hubbell; H Ronald Kaback
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-10-09       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Protein dynamics and monomer-monomer interactions in AntR activation by electron paramagnetic resonance and double electron-electron resonance.

Authors:  K Ilker Sen; Timothy M Logan; Piotr G Fajer
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2007-09-19       Impact factor: 3.162

View more
  22 in total

Review 1.  Toward the fourth dimension of membrane protein structure: insight into dynamics from spin-labeling EPR spectroscopy.

Authors:  Hassane S McHaourab; P Ryan Steed; Kelli Kazmier
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 5.006

2.  Confidence Analysis of DEER Data and Its Structural Interpretation with Ensemble-Biased Metadynamics.

Authors:  Eric J Hustedt; Fabrizio Marinelli; Richard A Stein; José D Faraldo-Gómez; Hassane S Mchaourab
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  A Straightforward Approach to the Analysis of Double Electron-Electron Resonance Data.

Authors:  Richard A Stein; Albert H Beth; Eric J Hustedt
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 1.600

4.  Navigating Membrane Protein Structure, Dynamics, and Energy Landscapes Using Spin Labeling and EPR Spectroscopy.

Authors:  Derek P Claxton; Kelli Kazmier; Smriti Mishra; Hassane S Mchaourab
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2015-08-29       Impact factor: 1.600

5.  Tau binds to lipid membrane surfaces via short amphipathic helices located in its microtubule-binding repeats.

Authors:  Elka R Georgieva; Shifeng Xiao; Peter P Borbat; Jack H Freed; David Eliezer
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  BCL::MP-fold: Membrane protein structure prediction guided by EPR restraints.

Authors:  Axel W Fischer; Nathan S Alexander; Nils Woetzel; Mert Karakas; Brian E Weiner; Jens Meiler
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2015-09-28

7.  Membrane protein structure determination using paramagnetic tags.

Authors:  Soumya Ganguly; Brian E Weiner; Jens Meiler
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 5.006

8.  Rapid Simulation of Unprocessed DEER Decay Data for Protein Fold Prediction.

Authors:  Diego Del Alamo; Maxx H Tessmer; Richard A Stein; Jimmy B Feix; Hassane S Mchaourab; Jens Meiler
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 4.033

9.  Simultaneous prediction of protein secondary structure and transmembrane spans.

Authors:  Julia Koehler Leman; Ralf Mueller; Mert Karakas; Nils Woetzel; Jens Meiler
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2013-04-10

10.  Pushing the size limit of de novo structure ensemble prediction guided by sparse SDSL-EPR restraints to 200 residues: The monomeric and homodimeric forms of BAX.

Authors:  Axel W Fischer; Enrica Bordignon; Stephanie Bleicken; Ana J García-Sáez; Gunnar Jeschke; Jens Meiler
Journal:  J Struct Biol       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 2.867

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.