Liyuan Chen1, Xiao Liang1, Chenyang Shen1, Steve Jiang1, Jing Wang1. 1. Medical Artificial Intelligence and Automation (MAIA) Lab, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scanning is used daily or weekly (i.e., on-treatment CBCT) for accurate patient setup in image-guided radiotherapy. However, inaccuracy of CT numbers prevents CBCT from performing advanced tasks such as dose calculation and treatment planning. Motivated by the promising performance of deep learning in medical imaging, we propose a deep U-net-based approach that synthesizes CT-like images with accurate numbers from planning CT, while keeping the same anatomical structure as on-treatment CBCT. METHODS: We formulated the CT synthesis problem under a deep learning framework, where a deep U-net architecture was used to take advantage of the anatomical structure of on-treatment CBCT and image intensity information of planning CT. U-net was chosen because it exploits both global and local features in the image spatial domain, matching our task to suppress global scattering artifacts and local artifacts such as noise in CBCT. To train the synthetic CT generation U-net (sCTU-net), we include on-treatment CBCT and initial planning CT of 37 patients (30 for training, seven for validation) as the input. Additional replanning CT images acquired on the same day as CBCT after deformable registration are utilized as the corresponding reference. To demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed sCTU-net, we use another seven independent patient cases (560 slices) for testing. RESULTS: We quantitatively compared the resulting synthetic CT (sCT) with the original CBCT image using deformed same-day pCT images as reference. The averaged accuracy measured by mean absolute error (MAE) between sCT and reference CT (rCT) on testing data is 18.98 HU, while MAE between CBCT and rCT is 44.38 HU. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed sCTU-net can synthesize CT-quality images with accurate CT numbers from on-treatment CBCT and planning CT. This potentially enables advanced CBCT applications for adaptive treatment planning.
PURPOSE: Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scanning is used daily or weekly (i.e., on-treatment CBCT) for accurate patient setup in image-guided radiotherapy. However, inaccuracy of CT numbers prevents CBCT from performing advanced tasks such as dose calculation and treatment planning. Motivated by the promising performance of deep learning in medical imaging, we propose a deep U-net-based approach that synthesizes CT-like images with accurate numbers from planning CT, while keeping the same anatomical structure as on-treatment CBCT. METHODS: We formulated the CT synthesis problem under a deep learning framework, where a deep U-net architecture was used to take advantage of the anatomical structure of on-treatment CBCT and image intensity information of planning CT. U-net was chosen because it exploits both global and local features in the image spatial domain, matching our task to suppress global scattering artifacts and local artifacts such as noise in CBCT. To train the synthetic CT generation U-net (sCTU-net), we include on-treatment CBCT and initial planning CT of 37 patients (30 for training, seven for validation) as the input. Additional replanning CT images acquired on the same day as CBCT after deformable registration are utilized as the corresponding reference. To demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed sCTU-net, we use another seven independent patient cases (560 slices) for testing. RESULTS: We quantitatively compared the resulting synthetic CT (sCT) with the original CBCT image using deformed same-day pCT images as reference. The averaged accuracy measured by mean absolute error (MAE) between sCT and reference CT (rCT) on testing data is 18.98 HU, while MAE between CBCT and rCT is 44.38 HU. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed sCTU-net can synthesize CT-quality images with accurate CT numbers from on-treatment CBCT and planning CT. This potentially enables advanced CBCT applications for adaptive treatment planning.
Authors: He Wang; Lei Dong; Ming Fwu Lii; Andrew L Lee; Renaud de Crevoisier; Radhe Mohan; James D Cox; Deborah A Kuban; Rex Cheung Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2005-03-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Vasant Kearney; Jason W Chan; Tianqi Wang; Alan Perry; Sue S Yom; Timothy D Solberg Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2019-07-02 Impact factor: 3.609
Authors: Holger R Roth; Le Lu; Nathan Lay; Adam P Harrison; Amal Farag; Andrew Sohn; Ronald M Summers Journal: Med Image Anal Date: 2018-02-01 Impact factor: 8.545
Authors: Yang Zhang; Ning Yue; Min-Ying Su; Bo Liu; Yi Ding; Yongkang Zhou; Hao Wang; Yu Kuang; Ke Nie Journal: Med Phys Date: 2021-05-14 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Rohil Malpani; Christopher W Petty; Junlin Yang; Neha Bhatt; Tal Zeevi; Vijay Chockalingam; Rajiv Raju; Alexandra Petukhova-Greenstein; Jessica Gois Santana; Todd R Schlachter; David C Madoff; Julius Chapiro; James Duncan; MingDe Lin Journal: J Vasc Interv Radiol Date: 2021-12-16 Impact factor: 3.464
Authors: Richard L J Qiu; Yang Lei; Joseph Shelton; Kristin Higgins; Jeffrey D Bradley; Walter J Curran; Tian Liu; Aparna H Kesarwala; Xiaofeng Yang Journal: Biomed Phys Eng Express Date: 2021-10-29
Authors: Tonghe Wang; Yang Lei; Yabo Fu; Jacob F Wynne; Walter J Curran; Tian Liu; Xiaofeng Yang Journal: J Appl Clin Med Phys Date: 2020-12-11 Impact factor: 2.102