Literature DB >> 34654011

Deep learning-based thoracic CBCT correction with histogram matching.

Richard L J Qiu1, Yang Lei1, Joseph Shelton1, Kristin Higgins1, Jeffrey D Bradley1, Walter J Curran1, Tian Liu1, Aparna H Kesarwala1, Xiaofeng Yang1.   

Abstract

Kilovoltage cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT)-based image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) is used for daily delivery of radiation therapy, especially for stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), which imposes particularly high demands for setup accuracy. The clinical applications of CBCTs are constrained, however, by poor soft tissue contrast, image artifacts, and instability of Hounsfield unit (HU) values. Here, we propose a new deep learning-based method to generate synthetic CTs (sCT) from thoracic CBCTs. A deep-learning model which integrates histogram matching (HM) into a cycle-consistent adversarial network (Cycle-GAN) framework, called HM-Cycle-GAN, was trained to learn mapping between thoracic CBCTs and paired planning CTs. Perceptual supervision was adopted to minimize blurring of tissue interfaces. An informative maximizing loss was calculated by feeding CBCT into the HM-Cycle-GAN to evaluate the image histogram matching between the planning CTs and the sCTs. The proposed algorithm was evaluated using data from 20 SBRT patients who each received 5 fractions and therefore 5 thoracic CBCTs. To reduce the effect of anatomy mismatch, original CBCT images were pre-processed via deformable image registrations with the planning CT before being used in model training and result assessment. We used planning CTs as ground truth for the derived sCTs from the correspondent co-registered CBCTs. The mean absolute error (MAE), peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR), and normalized cross-correlation (NCC) indices were adapted as evaluation metrics of the proposed algorithm. Assessments were done using Cycle-GAN as the benchmark. The average MAE, PSNR, and NCC of the sCTs generated by our method were 66.2 HU, 30.3 dB, and 0.95, respectively, over all CBCT fractions. Superior image quality and reduced noise and artifact severity were seen using the proposed method compared to the results from the standard Cycle-GAN method. Our method could therefore improve the accuracy of IGRT and corrected CBCTs could help improve online adaptive RT by offering better contouring accuracy and dose calculation.
© 2021 IOP Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CBCT correction; deep learning; histogram matching; lung SBRT

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34654011      PMCID: PMC8591620          DOI: 10.1088/2057-1976/ac3055

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomed Phys Eng Express        ISSN: 2057-1976


  26 in total

1.  The influence of antiscatter grids on soft-tissue detectability in cone-beam computed tomography with flat-panel detectors.

Authors:  J H Siewerdsen; D J Moseley; B Bakhtiar; S Richard; D A Jaffray
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Scatter correction method for X-ray CT using primary modulation: theory and preliminary results.

Authors:  Lei Zhu; N Robert Bennett; Rebecca Fahrig
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 10.048

3.  Empirical binary tomography calibration (EBTC) for the precorrection of beam hardening and scatter for flat panel CT.

Authors:  Rainer Grimmer; Marc Kachelriess
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Hounsfield unit recovery in clinical cone beam CT images of the thorax acquired for image guided radiation therapy.

Authors:  Rune Slot Thing; Uffe Bernchou; Ernesto Mainegra-Hing; Olfred Hansen; Carsten Brink
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Dosimetric study on learning-based cone-beam CT correction in adaptive radiation therapy.

Authors:  Tonghe Wang; Yang Lei; Nivedh Manohar; Sibo Tian; Ashesh B Jani; Hui-Kuo Shu; Kristin Higgins; Anees Dhabaan; Pretesh Patel; Xiangyang Tang; Tian Liu; Walter J Curran; Xiaofeng Yang
Journal:  Med Dosim       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 1.482

6.  Learning-based CBCT correction using alternating random forest based on auto-context model.

Authors:  Yang Lei; Xiangyang Tang; Kristin Higgins; Jolinta Lin; Jiwoong Jeong; Tian Liu; Anees Dhabaan; Tonghe Wang; Xue Dong; Robert Press; Walter J Curran; Xiaofeng Yang
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2018-12-11       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  3D radiotherapy dose prediction on head and neck cancer patients with a hierarchically densely connected U-net deep learning architecture.

Authors:  Dan Nguyen; Xun Jia; David Sher; Mu-Han Lin; Zohaib Iqbal; Hui Liu; Steve Jiang
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Comparison of CBCT based synthetic CT methods suitable for proton dose calculations in adaptive proton therapy.

Authors:  Adrian Thummerer; Paolo Zaffino; Arturs Meijers; Gabriel Guterres Marmitt; Joao Seco; Roel J H M Steenbakkers; Johannes A Langendijk; Stefan Both; Maria F Spadea; Antje C Knopf
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  CBCT-based synthetic CT generation using deep-attention cycleGAN for pancreatic adaptive radiotherapy.

Authors:  Yingzi Liu; Yang Lei; Tonghe Wang; Yabo Fu; Xiangyang Tang; Walter J Curran; Tian Liu; Pretesh Patel; Xiaofeng Yang
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2020-03-28       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Annual Report to the Nation on the Status of Cancer, part I: National cancer statistics.

Authors:  Kathleen A Cronin; Andrew J Lake; Susan Scott; Recinda L Sherman; Anne-Michelle Noone; Nadia Howlader; S Jane Henley; Robert N Anderson; Albert U Firth; Jiemin Ma; Betsy A Kohler; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 6.860

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Deep learning methods for enhancing cone-beam CT image quality toward adaptive radiation therapy: A systematic review.

Authors:  Branimir Rusanov; Ghulam Mubashar Hassan; Mark Reynolds; Mahsheed Sabet; Jake Kendrick; Pejman Rowshanfarzad; Martin Ebert
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 4.506

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.